this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2026
20 points (83.3% liked)

Linux

66302 readers
171 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Personally I haven't. While Linux is imperfect, choosing the right distro makes the rest of the experience straightforward. And with it's whole complexity, I find Linux more user friendly than Windows. Even driver issues, broken shadow file ownership and KDE specifics only made me more confident about my choice to use Linux after I solved everything.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BartyDeCanter@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

In the old days, lots, mostly around hardware support and until very recently the ability to run most games.

Nowadays, I’m mostly disappointed with the desktop environments lacking features that BeOS had in 1997. This is honestly a kernel and filesystem issue since most of those features require that the kernel/filesystem fully support indexed, extensible attribute queries. xattrs aren’t nearly sufficient. The remainder are framework/UI threading model limitations, which aren’t really kernel related.

All the time but then I remember it's my fault because it's open source and I am not fixing it either.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

with windows i can just blame m$, but on linux it's my fault

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 4 hours ago

I am perpetually disappointed by both Windows and the various flavors of Linux.

The difference is: there's relatively little you can do to "fix" Windows when you really need to. When Linux is broken, it may be a lot of work, but the option to fix it as you believe it should work is always there...

[–] mko@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

It happens. But when I boot into Windows those disappointments ease up.

[–] Artopal@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

It's difficult to be disappointed with something that is free.

Actually, one shouldn't be disappointed with things. Only people can disappoint you.

I was disappointed in the Debian crew when they standardized on systemd when it clearly wasn't ready yet.

And I was disappointed in the people running some distros that made Wayland the standard when it clearly wasn't ready yet (a few apps I rely on don't support it or run poorly on Wayland even now).

Other than that, free software, free choice, and a lot of learning possibilities. You just have to adapt your expectations. Change hardware, change software, change distros, and learn.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Artopal@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Trying a new distros is a 10 minutes endeavor. Tops. 🤷‍♂️ And there's Ventoy.

[–] Wfh@lemmy.zip 5 points 10 hours ago

Yes, I installed Fedora and everything was working OOTB. Nothing to tinker with, no issue with sound, WiFi, Bluetooth or external screens. Then I moved this SSD to a new AMD laptop and it worked perfectly. It even switched from Intel to AMD utils by itself.

So disappointing.

[–] PanArab@lemmy.ml 6 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

During the early days of Pulse Audio. Sound sometimes would stop working for inexplicable reasons.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Before Pulse Audio sound on Linux was literally lame.

ALSA works better than Pulse Audio. Fite me irl

[–] madthumbs@lemmy.world -2 points 6 hours ago
[–] Thorned_Rose@sh.itjust.works 4 points 13 hours ago

More the people behind it than the distro, but CachyOS. Aside from the performance improvements only being marginal, I was happy with the convenience after a decade of using Vanilla Arch. It was the first distro ever to tempt me away in that decade. I was really, really disappointed by the response to the age verification bs. The mods did a terrible job with discussion on the forums and the devs never made a formal response. The upside is I learned more about Systemd and now happily using Artix. So at least some good came out of my disappointment.

[–] savvywolf@pawb.social 9 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

I'm annoyed at modern Gnome's hostility towards user customisability. Their refusal to support server side decorations has trickled down to Cinnamon's Wayland compositor and it looks like it's going to be a barrier in Wayland Cinnamon.

[–] Artopal@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

Modern? Gnome developers were always like that.

[–] Harmonics041@feddit.uk 0 points 11 hours ago

I like gnome's approach to a unified and opinionated human interface design. I think it makes a nice cohesive user experience. If other projects don't want that then they probably shouldn't be building off of gnome.

[–] Dariusmiles2123@sh.itjust.works 10 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

Yes because Linux encourages you to make it your OS by customizing it, but it’s not easy as it should to create a backup of all that work so that you can easily deploy it on another computer.

I know that Clonezilla works in some situations or that NixOS coulb be a solution, but it’s not should be easier.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] comrade_twisty@feddit.org 34 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I am disappointed we still don't have a solid FOSS smartphone OS that can compete with the 2 monopolies who have cornered the market.

I don"t want ro sell my soul to Google or Apple just to use my bank (even on my computer thanks to mandatory 2fa apps) or to renew my government issued ID or to buy a train ticket on European public transport.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Jolla was a massive disappointment. As was the M$ buyout of Nokia.

[–] BartyDeCanter@piefed.social 1 points 2 hours ago

What’s wrong with Jolla?

[–] pixeldaemon@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

postmarketOS, LineageOS, GrapheneOS?

I know they have limited hardware support but that's only a matter of involvement at the end of the day

[–] gnunikky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Unfortunately only postmarket is actual Linux os from these and it's far from daily driveable, lineage and graphene are android roms and are therefore dependent on Google's decisions with AOSP.

[–] echo@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Out of curiosity, what about PostmarketOS is not daily driveable? Postmarket is a vague umbrella OS with a lot of DE options, all of which have vastly different user experiences. KDE mobile, phosh, and GNOME mobile have all come a long way and provide everything a smartphone OS needs. The only thing I’d argue that could prevent daily driving is lack of app support and lack of good mobile Linux hardware, but that’s not PostmarketOS’s problem.

[–] gnunikky@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 hours ago

Mainly in terms of firmware for actual phones, taking photos is basically impossible as the photos either look horrible or don't work at all. Frequent sound issues, lower battery life, unreliable mobile network connection and lack of inbuilt esim support. OSes based on halium have better experience though they do still lack the app support.

[–] hexagonwin@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

have you tried it on a real device? maybe this is a hardware support issue, but no matter which DE i use (be it phosh, plasma mobile, gnome, ..) it was extremely buggy and mostly unusable. battery drained like crazy, calls didn't work properly, the list goes on. to be fair this was on a poco f1 and lg k10, which aren't in main or community though..

my daily driver is a 2013 phone with custom rom and i've daily'ed a self ported ubports phone in the past, my level of tolerance for buggy experience in daily driver phones is very likely much lower than others

[–] echo@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, device support is the biggest issue. But the OS as a whole is pretty good. I used it with a OnePlus 6T and a Nothing Phone 1, both of which have pretty decent support. Some things about it were broken, and I didn’t try putting in a SIM card and making calls or texts, but the overall experience was good. I have high hopes for when we eventually get good “flagship” linux mobile phones that have full PostmarketOS compatibility.

[–] pixeldaemon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 14 hours ago

Technically AOSP also runs a Linux kernel. Lineage and Graphene are like this only for compatibility reasons, no one stops them if they decide to fork. And AOSP itself is still not that bad though

[–] bluemite@lemmy.world 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

That disappointment isn't with Linux

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

depends on where you draw the line.

in the past, i've been mildly dissapointed by the drama-queen-esque antics of the kernel developers; but i most recently DEEPLY disappointed by how thoroughly the kernel developers to caved to the us gov't's demand to kick out russian developers instead of complying maliciously like others do.

both are separate from linux, but linux can't exist without them.

[–] 712@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

The moments I have been disappointed by Linux were the moments I learned most about hardware and software.

Linux made me switch the WiFi card of my computer, which is something I’ve never done before and would have deemed “impossible”.

Linux is like a teacher that sometimes slaps you on the hands, but who is always helping you to expand your knowledge.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 9 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

I usually blame this on the hardware manufacturers for being secretive gatekeepy fucks that make things only work with shitty drivers

[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It's usually not malicious. Hardware is that way by default, and it takes effort to make it not be that way, and then someone still has to write the driver.

Technically all the info you need is inside the Windows driver, it's just a bit difficult to get at. It's on us to git gud so we won't need the cooperation of the hardware companies.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 1 points 4 hours ago

Ironically, we're getting into situations where our WiFi card vendor (Ezurio) supports Linux but not Windows.

[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

The biggest thing I fought with since getting started has been audio. First figuring out how to make an Elgato device cooperate (not exactly the most linux-friendly company to say the least), then setting up virtual sinks and routing everything appropriately, and finally getting my mic to not sound like actual garbage.

Frustrating as hell and a very long process to get all of that working out, but definitely learned a lot from it.

[–] 712@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 13 hours ago

It’s always interesting for me to read other people’s stories like this because I never ever had any audio issues with Linux. Can’t say the same about Winslow.

[–] pinball_wizard@lemmy.zip 11 points 1 day ago

Oh sure, all the time.

A computer running public auditable software refined by some of history's top computer scientists...is still just a computer.

We taught spicy electrified rocks how to help us fill out tax forms.

It's going to fall short every so often.

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

Gestures vaguely at Ubuntu.......

[–] infinitevalence@discuss.online 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I am disappointed at professional application support, but not with Linux specifically. In my professional life I have needed to use products like Visio, Adobe Suite, Autodesk software, and others.

I am often forced to use Windows for my work computer because of these limitations, and while I realize its not the fault of Linux, the lack of install base demanding professional applications run on Linux is a community issue. While I always prefer FOSS over PROP software, sometimes I really do need to run PROP software on linux, and that means convincing enough people to demand that support from the developer.

[–] WarmApplePieShrek@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

There is a compatibility issue too. Every Windows 11 is almost identical, enough for software to run, but Linux encompasses a lot of different systems. Valve makes it work on Ubuntu and then if you're not using Ubuntu, makes it your problem to go the rest of the way (usually pretty easy) which is a fair tradeoff but also not the plug-and-play you get with Windows. And don't even mention X11 versus Wayland.

True but that's far less of an issue for most mainstream distros. If it works on one Linux distro then it probably works on another or a reasonable tech person can address the missing dependencies.

While I don't love flat packs it's one thing they do tend to solve.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] akunohana@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

Edit: not the kernel or the GNU utilities themselves, but rather some people on the various affiliated forums. While most people have been kind and helpful, a handful of bad apples don't know how to behave. They are hostile to the point where one could easily lose the will to have anything to do with Linux.

I have only ever been positively surprised. Just a few of all the good habits that Linux has made me adopt:

  1. RTFM
  2. Reading logs
  3. Keeping/reusing old hardware
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›