this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2026
112 points (99.1% liked)

Trans

2212 readers
2 users here now

General trans community.

Rules:

  1. Follow all blahaj.zone rules

  2. All posts must be trans-related. Other queer-related posts go to c/lgbtq.

  3. Don't post negative, depressing news articles about trans issues unless there is a call to action or a way to help.

Resources:

Best resource: https://github.com/cvyl/awesome-transgender Site with links to resources for just about anything.

Trevor Project: crisis mental health services for LGBTQ people, lots of helpful information and resources: https://www.thetrevorproject.org/

The Gender Dysphoria Bible: useful info on various aspects of gender dysphoria: https://genderdysphoria.fyi/en

StainedGlassWoman: Various useful essays on trans topics: https://stainedglasswoman.substack.com/

Trans resources: https://trans-resources.info/

[USA] Resources for trans people in the South: https://southernequality.org/resources/transinthesouth/#provider-map

[USA] Report discrimination: https://action.aclu.org/legal-intake/report-lgbtqhiv-discrimination

[USA] Keep track on trans legislation and news: https://www.erininthemorning.com/

[GERMANY] Bundesverband Trans: Find medical trans resources: https://www.bundesverband-trans.de/publikationen/leitfaden-fuer-behandlungssuchende/

[GERMANY] Trans DB: Insurance information (may be outdated): https://transdb.de/

[GERMANY] Deutsche Gesellschaft für Transidentität und Intersexualität: They have contact information for their advice centers and some general information for trans and intersex people. They also do activism: dgti.org

*this is a work in progress, and these resources are courtesy of users like you! if you have a resource that helped you out in your trans journey, comment below in the pinned post and I'll add here to pass it on

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

California said it will set up a safety net to protect transgender youth if the federal government won’t. A state budget just signed by Gov. Gavin Newsom includes $26 million in one-time funding to protect access to healthcare for trans youth, according to LAist. Another $30 million was budgeted to cover funding gaps for providers after the Trump administration cut funding to the state’s Medi-Cal program and other revenue sources.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] thoughtfuldragon@lemmy.blahaj.zone 68 points 4 weeks ago (3 children)

Everything I know about Newsome says that this was included in spite of him and not because of him.

[–] SeductiveTortoise@piefed.social 23 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

I wanted to write that this guy absolutely confuses me, but I think your explanation makes more sense than him flip-flopping between good guy and asshole.

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 15 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's not that he flip flops between good or evil, he just flip flops with the change of the wind. A lot of the dislike of Newsom is that he doesn't really seem to have a backbone, and caves if something he supports at one point isn't seemingly politically advantageous.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world -4 points 4 weeks ago (2 children)

You could frame that as following what the electorate want.

[–] Zorque@lemmy.world 7 points 4 weeks ago

You could, and most populist politicians do, but that doesn't make it true.

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 5 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Yeah, but are we talking what the Democrats want, or the Republicans? Because it seems like Newsom can't really tell the difference.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 0 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

A good leader is a leader for all. In these divisive times, that's probably impossible. And certainly the a Democrat candidate should have somewhat progressive ideals. Or at least not regressive. Don't get me wrong I'm not saying this guy is a good leader or a good Democrat. Probably not. I just think the U.S. has been so starved of good leaders, the electorate wouldn't recognize one.

[–] Addv4@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago

No, we just have far the many that are completely guided by their donations. The electorate can usually recognize them, if they even hear about them, which is getting harder given the sheer amount of money flowing around that doesn't like progressive candidates. Honestly, a good example to see it is probably the Michigan Senate primary, where Abdul El-Sayed is running against Haley Stevens, and Abdul (the very much more progressive candidate) is hopefully gonna win (wild amounts of money are being spent on Stevens, like at least 10 mil on ads thus far). The electorate isn't completely dumb, they just often have the wool pulled over their eyes by moneyed interest groups, which is why I'm always annoyed by candidates who clearly don't have central beliefs and can change their views to suit whatever they need, usually to the ones where they can get the most donations for their campaign.

Or because he knows it boils Trump's piss.

[–] belated_frog_pants@beehaw.org 15 points 4 weeks ago

Are we sure he didnt begrudgingly do this? He's been such a shitstain about it :/

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 4 weeks ago

Even a broken clock still has to pander twice every few years.

[–] brookedSmile@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Abyssian@lemmy.world 3 points 4 weeks ago

"I really want you to think I care about people and actually want/plan to tax the ultra wealthy. Vote for me!"

[–] florencia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 weeks ago
[–] Rivermoonwolf@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Much as I hate Newsom, I do appreciate him signing this. Granted, it was probably through gritted teeth, but at this point I'll take the win.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

It's panderung for votes. He doesn't like trans people. Probably wipp imprison them all as soon as all the tools epect him rather than a more reasonable candidate.

[–] Soapbox@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Does he actively dislike trans people? Or just not give a shit about them unless its politically beneficial? I just kinda assumed the latter.

[–] kilttilter@mastodon.scot 1 points 3 weeks ago

@Soapbox @ScoffingLizard with Musk's help, it's likely hate...and doesn't want to admit he might like some feminine boys waiting to transition too...