this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2026
66 points (94.6% liked)

Green Energy

4442 readers
509 users here now

Everything about energy production and storage.

Related communities:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fedditter@feddit.org 3 points 11 hours ago

Was bedeutet das für Hessen?

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 19 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

It's like solar roadways, except once again trains are the natural evolutionary end point

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Musk will do it better with tunnels full of self driving cars that are recharged in real time from the solar panel roads they are driving on!

[–] towerful@programming.dev 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, the tunnel needs to be surrounded by magnets that induce a current in the Tesla as it drives through. That current can then be used to charge the Tesla.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 5 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

People who believe this works likely have studied business economics.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

after rolling out 100 metres of photovoltaic (PV) panels in between active tracks

One of the biggest concerns, previously expressed by the International Union of Railways, is that the panels could suffer micro-cracks, lead to a higher risk of fires and distract train drivers due to reflections

Built-in sensors also ensure they work properly while brushes attached to the end of trains can remove dirt from the panels’ surface.

Yeah that doesn't really sound like a resounding success IMO.

Just put it on a house?

[–] GreyEyedGhost@piefed.ca 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Concerns don't mean it's a problem, just that it was identified as a possible problem. Did this study bear these concerns out? From the article, right between two of the paragraphs you copied:

Sun-Ways has tackled these issues by building more resistant panels than what would be installed on rooftops, fitted with an anti-reflection filter.

Also, yes, install them on houses. We can do both. We should keep putting them just about everywhere they work until there is no added benefit or there is no more fossil fuel being used for electricity.

[–] pageflight@piefed.social 2 points 10 hours ago

Sure if we can do both! But it seems like lots of easier options are still untapped in many places, like the sides of the rail right of way.

[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

This coupled with solar canals would be amazing.

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social -3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sj_zero@lotide.fbxl.net 5 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

And the giant money incinerator!

[–] themaninblack@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Solar coal mines!

[–] dadarobot@lemmy.ml 6 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 7 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

This idea makes a thousand times more sense because they're not trying to replace the load-bearing surface with an expanse of expensive and delicate glass, they're just filling in otherwise unused space

[–] warm@kbin.earth 7 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

You know what makes more sense? Putting them on homes.

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 5 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I agree we should be putting solar panels on roofs. I disagree that this railway solar idea is impractical. If this article is to be believed they have already demonstrated effective operation at pilot scale. They mentioned some challenges specific to this application, but they also seem to have compensated for them

[–] warm@kbin.earth 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The challenges are what makes them impractical. The company has investment it needs to repay, so it obviously wants to tell you it's not a big deal. It's much more cost efficient and solar efficient to install them on roofs of homes and building, create shelters from them, or simply just make a field of them. Things like "solar railways" should be a last resort, after we have already covered the obvious solutions.

[–] Transform2942@lemmy.ml 2 points 15 hours ago

I don't think it's a slam dunk case. There's lots of costs associated with installing solar on a roof that may not apply here. I think someone would have to do a comparative lifecycle analysis

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 12 hours ago

This one makes a lot of sense though. You have a built in way to clean the panels through the trains, the panels are protected by the rails, and theoretically nothing should be putting weight on them (in practice the weight of a human or maybe a cow - at most)

Plus railroads last a very long time. Basically until we rip them up

We don't need a solution to transition away from fossil fuels, we need lots of solutions. We really should be putting up solar panels anywhere and everywhere they will survive for at least a few years. Even if it's 70% as productive as a properly angled panel, so what? We don't need to min max here

We need production ramped up and capacity online as fast as possible. If solar railways become a new source of demand, that means more investment in both

[–] supersquirrel@sopuli.xyz 5 points 18 hours ago

Pretty ridiculous idea on the face of it but who knows!

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

Soon to be proactively banned in the US.

[–] StealthLizardDrop@piefed.social -1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

How easy are they to steal?... asking for a friend... who needs panels for his house... yes lets go with that

[–] JacobCoffinWrites@slrpnk.net 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Probably similar to stealing them from a field, just with more risk of getting hit by a train

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 2 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Screwing up our transition to renewables... You (general) probably deserve to get hit.