this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2026
285 points (98.0% liked)

Technology

85964 readers
3612 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I abandoned those type brands decades ago. Advertise on TV? You're off the purchase list

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 21 points 19 hours ago (4 children)

I have Zero brand loyalty. Best ingredients for the lowest price gets the sale.

I have loyalty to higher prices if they treat their employees right. I'm willing to shell out an extra dollar if it means the employees aren't getting paid shit an hour

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Keep in mind that most off-brand products are literally the same brand name product in a different container.

In Canada we have a few off brand labels like No Name and Compliments. Take ketchup for example. The off-brand ketchup is literally the same brand name Heinz or French's it's sitting beside, but for $1.50 cheaper. That's because the off brand companies like Wal Mart and Loblaws pay for production cycle time at the main plants. So a run of Heinz ketchup will actually be a run of No Name ketchup. Heinz gets more money for the use of production time than they would selling that line of their own brand ketchup.

If you're brand loyal to something, you're just willing to pay more for a name, not the thing you want. Sour cream, mayo, toothpaste, even soap is all the exact same as the brand name stuff you're buying.

Most of the time you can tell where it came from by the production stamp. All companies have their own number so the no name ketchup would have the same product number stamp as the brand name one because it came from the same facility.

[–] pahlimur@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The recipe is different for the store brand. I did this stuff in the dairy industry for a while. Its not production cycles in dairy, it's vats. So store brand orders a few vats of product, with way lay less actual milk or doesnt specify as high a minimum quality milk products. More dyes and filler during finishing and no aging. All store brands are essentially flavored and colored mozzarella. They are lower quality.

I still buy them though. Mozzarella is good enough for most recipes.

For other products it's similar. Lower tolerances on inputs and outputs to reduce cost. Still probably 80% as good as name brand.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I've worked in a few of these production lines and they're literally just changing the packaging at the end of production. The packages could be different enough to change taste or texture but the product itself is identical.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Most store brands come from the same manufacturers as brand name products, they just change the packaging.

[–] Kjell@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

My only loyalty is to brands that have higher quality than the competitors. And that only last as long as they are maintaining their quality or another brand is increasing their quality.

[–] tamal3@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

What about Uncle Sam cereal? It's gone now, bought by a big cereal company and nearly immediately shut down, but there was nothing as fibrous and un-sugared on the American cereal market as that. Oh, sigh, Uncle Sam.

I mean, I wouldn't care what brand it was if there were anything comparable. But given that it was the only one like it, I was extremely loyal.

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 2 points 17 hours ago

Hmmm, if only there was something those companies could do to retain customers. Something like lower prices without shrinking sizes?

[–] Assassassin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"abandon their favorite brands" is a hell of a way to rephrase "can't afford to continue eating what they have been previously". Glad to see it reframed in a way that makes the companies seem like victims.

[–] Microtonal_Banana@lemmy.zip 7 points 18 hours ago

Thats like when we see headlines like "gen z are destroying the alcohol industry"

[–] SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
  • Brands increase prices
  • People stop buying brands
  • Brands cry foul
  • Oh no! Anyway....

The trick, William Potter, is to bleed the people just enough to satiate your parasitism without exsanguinating them, eh?

Gee, we've never seen that trick before.

I stopped buying products that went from chocolate to chocoly

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Surely, more capitalism will fix this.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 9 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

"We're losing money. People aren't buying our products anymore! What should we do?"

Shrink the size of the product and increase the cost. That will clearly be the solution!

[–] Kjell@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Another option is to buy the alternative product and cancel it.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

You mean the brands that are owned by like 5 companies?

Fuck em.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] deddit@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This article felt a bit like AI click bait. Seems like they were really more interested in talking about AI and providing a link to [redacted]'s AI site. When writing an article about price hikes, why would you take a quote from a CEO pitching his AI site? Why not talk to actual consumers or even better yet CEO's of companies that are gouging us, or companies that are providing lower priced items. And what about stores, nothing said about them yet they are not innocent in this, nothing about them in the article.

[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

In a world where every product sucks due to years of cost cutting and shrinkflation, brands mean very little.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 6 points 1 day ago (8 children)

In foods especially, they have substituted corn syrup for sugar, steroid+antibiotic pumped milk and meat for "real" meat (typical market chicken is a travesty these past years), GMO crops sprayed with extreme weed killers and pesticides for simple sun and water grown food. They like to say our food bills are going down in real dollars, but they're not, not if you buy organic GMO free - which is what most food used to be not so long ago.

[–] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

steroid+antibiotic pumped milk and meat for “real” meat

There's a very specific reason Canada doesn't allow your dairy and meat products into Canada. I work for DFNS and our bare minimum requirements are vastly more strict than your federal requirements.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 18 hours ago

The "mouth feel" texture of chicken makes me sick these days - it's like the animal was emaciated and bloated when slaughtered, which in many ways they were.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Framing this as a customer loss is funny. Switching brands means it's the brands that are losing, geniuses.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GoofSchmoofer@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"WILL NO ONE THINK OF THE BRANDS!!!"

and somehow it's all the Millennial's fault - Damn (40 year old) kids!

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 6 points 1 day ago

In the 70s it felt like brands actually meant something. Since the 90s, they haven't. Brands have milked their loyal followers for every last penny of profit while cheapening their products as much as they possibly can. Brands have become an anti-pattern for me, if a particular brand is "commanding a premium" that's a sign to me to A) dig DEEP on pre-purchase quality information and if that's hard to come by (which it usually is) B) walk away from the recognized brand name - assume it to be of inferior quality to go with its higher price.

I shopped in the same grocery store chain my grandparents and parents shopped in my whole life since the 1960s until about 8-10 years ago. At that point they started milking their brand loyalists and literally jacked our monthly food bill 2x, +100%, and that's not industry wide inflation, that's how much they inflated relative to the competition. We went from spending 90% of our food, soaps, pharmacy/drug store purchases there down to less than 5% in the first year after we quit them, and since then they now get less than 1% of our budget, only catching our purchases when they're the only store open or other cases of extreme convenience purchasing. During the pandemic, we had instantcart deliver groceries from a competitor and a $120 delivered order, including $10 tip and delivery fees, were still far less expensive than the same products from the "leading" chain.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Not only is the shit expensive, but may as well eat a bowl of ice cream with as much sugar as a lot of cereal has. Having cereal for breakfast daily is akin to using soda for hydration. It sure tastes good, but I’ve cut down on my cereal intake for multiple reasons.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Having cereal for breakfast daily is akin to using soda for hydration.

Well, I was born in the 1960s and honey coated chocolate sugar bombs were already the cereal of choice among my kindergarten classmantes - and soda for hydration was pretty standard then too.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

What people think is unhealthy or healthy changes once they start actually looking into it.

Soda? Clearly unhealthy. Juice? Milk? Clearly healthy.

Well, except that excessive carbs are a problem, and while milk and juice may have some nutrition (that you can also easily get from other sources), they have as much sugar as soda.

As a diabetic, I try not to drink calories. Milk and juice are slightly worse than regular soda. And I will occasionally have some of any of those. But occasionally, and a small amount, not a large amount.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

I stopped buying Campbell's or any of its subsidiary brands a few years ago when they both raised prices and reduced the size of the can.

They were underhanded about it too because they made the cans slightly taller so it wasn't obvious that they had less volume.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] breezeblock@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fuck brands. Buy less shit.

load more comments (1 replies)

Quite a few years ago.

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 62 points 2 days ago

Capitalism cannibalising itself one brand at a time.

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (12 children)

I honestly can't trust any brands and their packaging because of shrinkflation.

Eveytime I go into a grocery store i see packaging stay the same size but the amount inside the packages keeps getting smaller and smaller.

[–] stealth_cookies@lemmy.ca 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think this may be a bad example. Different fruits are not necessarily sold in the same weights. Fresh strawberries are typically sold in heavier containers than a container of raspberries, and have been for a long time. Raspberries are just a more expensive fruit.

Exactly what I was thinking. Large strawberries are pretty uniformly cheap for me. Much less so for raspberries, blueberries, etc.

If we want to complain about the state of things fabrications make our arguments less trustworthy the moment they come out of our mouths.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] radiofreebc@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Everything sucks these days. Every product is worse today than it was 10 years ago.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Facts.

I quit drinking soda this month because the off-brand soda I like inexplicably stop being sold by every store in the area, probably due to the Iran War, and RC Cola, Pepsi, and Coke all cost the same gouged prices. I could just take the price gouging and buy them anyway, but I'd rather quit consuming it out of spite.

That it's healthier is just a side bonus.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›