this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2026
584 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

86814 readers
4544 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology are being sued by seventeen plaintiffs in the California Northern District Court, who allege that the three tech manufacturers are colluding to artificially increase the price of RAM.

Seventeen individual plaintiffs, including three small businesses, have launched a class action lawsuit in the Northern District of California against the three largest RAM and chip manufacturers in the world: Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology. The plaintiffs allege that the three tech companies are colluding to raise the prices of RAM by keeping supplies artificially low, blaming it all on an AI data center-driven “RAMpocalypse” rather than corporate policy.

The Garciaguirre et al v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al case was filed earlier this week, on June 25, in the California Northern District Court, and lists three small computer retailers, Troy’s Computers LLC, JB Tech Solutions LLC, and WNTD Fab LLC, among its seventeen plaintiffs.

The plaintiffs claim that Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron Technology are essentially part of a cartel that is collaborating to inflate DRAM and chip prices by controlling the overwhelming majority of the market. While proving that will obviously be a lot harder than alleging it, it’s no secret that the three companies own roughly 90 percent of the DRAM market.

And it’s no secret that Samsung and SK Hynix have been previously indicted for doing exactly what the plaintiffs are accusing them of doing now. In 2005, two Samsung executives and one Hynix America executive were indicted by a San Francisco jury for DRAM price-fixing and “bid-rigging.”

Bid-rigging can take many forms, but in this example, Samsung and Hynix America were accused of “issuing price quotations in accordance with the agreements reached” during private meetings, and “agreeing during those meetings and telephone conversations to charge prices of DRAM at certain levels to be sold to certain [original equipment manufacturers]” in the United States.

more links: https://wccftech.com/memory-trio-samsung-sk-hynix-micron-face-class-action-lawsuit/

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 114 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I mean, yeah, of course they are. With that said, they would be absolutely stupid to do so explicitly. If they actually find evidence during discovery, that just means management is dumb as rocks. So... They might.

[–] scibra122@piefed.social 79 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They've been caught before, which would make getting caught a second time even more embarrassing

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 47 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And me, without any knowledge of this story, I'm going to weigh in with a hunch.

I haven't read the story. I never heard of the previous story. I read your comment, and thats it.

So.....here's my hunch.

They were caught doing this before, weren't given any REAL reprocussions. Nothing that would discourage them from keeping at it. They never stopped price fixing, and they just write off any fines for getting caught as the price of doing business.

So. How'd I do? Did I get it 100% right?

[–] Omega_Jimes@lemmy.ca 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well hold on now.

That's basically exactly what happened during the RAM cartel of the early 2000's. I think one guy went to jail for like 6 months, but other than that, yeah.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 26 points 1 month ago

He also went straight to a similar company in another executive position after he was out. There's definitely no way he continued to do the exact same thing at the other company he went to. No way at all.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 18 points 1 month ago

They were caught doing this before, weren't given any REAL reprocussions.

Hey wait, but some executives were jailed the first time. They're out now of course. And the penalties were a small fraction of the profits. And they're now working at different but similar companies in executive positions again.

But they totally learned their lessons. Totally.

[–] VonReposti@feddit.dk 3 points 1 month ago

They've only been caught once before but it's the third time it happens. The market looked identical between 2016 and 2018 (wiki). China also investigated them IIRC

[–] Tim_Bisley@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

Getting a slap on the wrist is hardly embarrassing. They were only fine 180 million last time around.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

they would be absolutely stupid to do so explicitly

It's not stupid to do things that easy way when you know you won't get punished

[–] ImgurRefugee114@reddthat.com 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Yes, but I meant that you could get the same results without DMing your buddy "wanna do a crime?"

... Though this frequently happens.

[–] Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] spicehoarder@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

Have you lost your mind?

[–] teslekova@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago

Why would you bother to hide it if you won't be punished and you literally have no shame?

[–] agentTeiko@piefed.social 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The sad thing is companies get away with this now by interfacing with 3rd party algorithmic pricing intelligence companies. It's a way of laundering collusion behind a machine.

[–] LikeableLime@piefed.social 1 points 1 month ago

Same way rents are controlled. Its so scummy and should be illegal

[–] DannyMac@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Thoughts and prayers to the lawfirms to find as much damning evidence as possible!

[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Grok, how can my buddies and I inflate the prices of our companies' products to get free money? We need it badly to purchase more kidnapped Asian children. Also, ensure we don't get caught. Make no mistakes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nobody chasing "AI" as hard as they are isn't at least as dumb as rocks at a minimum.

[–] Chronographs@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

To be fair, they aren’t chasing ai as much as selling hardware to the people who are

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Loaning them billions of dollars to do so.

[–] IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

Nothing much has changed. During the gold rush people who actually made money sold shovels and pickaxes, only very few got rich by actually digging dirt.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gambling, you say?!

In the casino?!!!

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I’ve heard the United States referred to as one giant casino, pre 2024.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Hey now. Federalism guarantees that it will remain 50 small casinos.

[–] mlg@lemmy.world 25 points 1 month ago

The only way this succeeds if is Micron betrays the other two like last time and makes a better desl for themselves in exchange for being a snitch.

Otherwise they won't be able to gather enough evidence for a quick trial and this will last close to a decade before each company agrees to some penny handouts.

Unless they're really dumb and didn't learn to hide their collusion from the last time they did this.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

50¢ off your next RAM purchase and a free credit check.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I signed up for some Facebook class action settlement. A couple months ago I received an e-giftcard for like $50.

Then a week or so ago I got notification "additional funds have been allocated"...$5.09!

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Years back the company I work for ended bankruptcy and I never got my final paycheck occasionally they'll contact me to give me bits and bobs of what they owe me. At this rate I should receive my final month's paycheck in full within no less than 80 years.

Jokes on there might since I stole all the pick n' mix cups and sold them on eBay for more than my paycheck.

[–] nesuno@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Judge checks notes: hmmm no, actually it's just capitalism.

[–] ruan@lemmy.eco.br 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Judge checks bank account*

FTFY

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

They're the same picture

[–] kopasz7@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 month ago

I'm glad to see it. Wouldn't be the first time they colluded.

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yeah I'm guessing nothing will come of this, no one important will face any consequences and these companies will go on making lots of profits after paying a little slap on the wrist fine / cost of doing business that is a fraction of the profit they made while breaking the law

[–] rmrf@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

If memory serves, a memory exec from Samsung went to prison a few years ago for this same stuff.

Different DOJ, though

[–] RxBrad@infosec.pub 10 points 1 month ago (2 children)

"Oh no, we're gonna get fined a hundred million for the extra couple-hundred-billion we made by price fixing & collusion. Oh nooooo... 💸"

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yep.

When fines are nothing but a fraction of a fraction of the money made, then it ceases to be a fine, and just becomes an evil tax.

Which is why businesses should face fines based on their income, starting at 50% of yearly earnings, and going up to at least 300% of their yearly earnings.

Bad behavior won't change until you threaten their profits.

[–] SalamiDommie@lemmus.org 1 points 1 month ago

Weirdly enough, business would advance or develope if there wasn't something to be gained. Or funded, and you need an excess of liquid cash to fund new things.

It is a weird cycle, and I agree not good. It is just weird how intertwined it all is.

[–] greatwhitebuffalo41@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 month ago

I read that in the voice of the cable company in South Park

[–] Highlow@piefed.social 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Can't they just buy some trumpcoin and make this all go away ?

[–] timewarp@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Heck, they may just hand over a brown bag full of cash, get caught on camera, and still face no consequences.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Yeah but with the bribecoin, they don't have to leave the comfort of their own home

[–] plz1@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

I mean, Micron for sure did, when they "exited consumer RAM to focus on data centers" at a point where overall RAM was at peak demand. That's a supreme intent to create artificial scarcity.

[–] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I just assume Samsung does shady stuff now. Once a decent company is just as bad as the rest or worse.

[–] trainsrkool@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

don't worry every1 hehe theyll slide some checks praise the orange stain a little and itll be just fine for the shareholders

[–] fira@lemmy.today 3 points 1 month ago

lol. To the surprise of no one. If Nvidia/apple/major customers sued, maybe we’d see actual price drops

[–] UsoSaito@feddit.uk 3 points 1 month ago

Their profit margins already prove it.

[–] Quasit@beige.party 2 points 1 month ago

@ekZepp
I'm shocked, SHOCKED I tell you! 🙄

[–] AliOski@feddit.nl 1 points 1 week ago
[–] GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Is there any evidence whatsoever that they’re keeping supply low? They’re selling literally every chip they make, there is significantly more demand than supply, so if they were keeping supply low artificially they would still be making more then they are now because it would cause no drop in price and would make them even more money.

load more comments
view more: next ›