this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2026
113 points (98.3% liked)

World News

56655 readers
2339 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Politics aside, dude seems like a genuine scumbag.

top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Colombian here, I can give some context, at least from my perspective.

Current president is Petro, a left wing president. Cepeda is the candidate from there same party. Abelardo is the far right candidato that won.

Petro has done an awful job. I'll add some examples in a comment. Cepeda seems better than Petro, but lacks criticism against him.

On the other hand Abelardo got sold as an outsider to the classical politics, as he came out of nowhere, and 1 year ago nobody knew who he was. He's actually been an ally of Uribe (our most controversial president in recent history; far right as well). He also got his fortune by defending and being an ally of criminals (think an IRL Saul Goodman). He's beyond awful and like OP said, a genuine scumbag (e.g., in an interview, he laughed while remembering how he used kill cats with explosives).

Some people were gonna vote against Petro no matter what. Some people really ate the lies that Abelardo, a man that got his fortune by allying with criminals, will fight really hard against criminals. Some people think both candidates were awful, and had to choose the least awful of both of them. And that's how we got him as our next president.

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 3 points 1 hour ago

Examples of Petro's missmanagments:

For context, keep in mind Colombia is a rather por country, that has been in an armed conflict spanning several decades.

See for example his "Total peace" program, in which he wanted to resolve conflicts with armed groups via dialogue rather than violence. While this sounds very good on paper, the reality is that the majority of said groups simply acted in bad faith, and used the program as an opportunity to grow bigger. Number of combatants in said groups grew like 50%; extorsions: up 25%; terrorism: up 90%; kidnappings: up 290% (!). And yet he and Cepeda insists on the program, instead of realizing you can't take that route with some groups that simply act in bad faith.

Both of them are also pushing for a "Constitution Asambly", a way in which we can create a complete new Constitution. Our current one is from 1991 and allows it to be constantly modified, but enforces some limitations of power to the president, which they want to remove (like the CNE, an election overviewer and also the National Bank independence from there current president's hands). He famously promised not to do that in both his 2018 and 2022 campaigns, but once he got elected, started pushing for it in 2024.

Health sector also got hit baddly (it was bad, but not this bad), corruption has been rampant (which, being fair, has always been the case) and the country got bankrupted. Petro genuinely also looks like he's contantly high in drugs, I'm not even kidding.

He's also constantly crying on Twitter about how the elections have been fraudulent, despite not showing evidence, or spreading missionformation proved to be false. All of these generate an uneasy feeling of his party keeping the power for other 4 years.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

Man, Colombia can't catch break, can it?

I'll start making a bingo card for this one

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 1 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 42 minutes ago)

In the 21st century, Presidential systems seem to be uniquely vulnerable to fascist politics. Not just Trump, but also Bolsonaro, Bukele, and the Chilean and now the Colombian examples as well. Parliamentary systems are of course not immune (cf Meloni and Orban) but they seem to be more resilient. At the same time, eg. in Turkey, the move towards authoritarianism seems to also be coupled with a move towards more and more presidential models. It seems fascists love the kinds of institutional shortcuts that strong executives can take.

[–] spacegoat@lemmy.world 38 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

People are plain stupid all over the world

[–] stoly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

This is the truth. They almost always vote by their current emotional state, too.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 35 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 11 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Shit and they were doing so good lately

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 1 points 1 hour ago

Not really, Petro did an awful job. Some violenta crimes were going throught the charts (e.g., kidnappings increased by 290% since 2022). The health sector was also hit very bad.

I think it's is precisely Petro's blunders and Cepeda's lack of criticism a main reason of why we'll have this Aspriella clown as a president.

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

"millionaire" Now I think that means bought the election.

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 24 points 10 hours ago

Surely nothing wrong with having rich people make politics ... surely they will rather improve life for the normal people rather than their rich friends.

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 15 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I don’t really know anything about this situation. Should I just assume that the CIA is CIAing?

[–] buran@lemmy.today 7 points 1 hour ago

Colombian here, people actually do support this Bukele/Trump/Milei wannabe.

Half of us are morons.

[–] StillAlive@piefed.world 32 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Why? People can't be morons without psyops?

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 11 points 9 hours ago

Lots of psyops besides the ones the CIA does.

[–] ivan@piefed.social 14 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

You're putting too much faith in an intelligence agency with most embarrassing history (and I must specify that whole of it is embarrassing) under most embarrassing (up to date) management of United States.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 10 hours ago

columbia has always had a far right situation for decades, likely influenced by the CIA in the past.