this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2026
120 points (96.9% liked)

Privacy

49245 readers
620 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/66542364

No

I don't think so

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

If you do move on, please take a minute to contact the Website or service and tell them why. If "we" just collectively walk out they might not understand why.

In order to make this easier I wrote a short template :

To whom it may concern, I tried visiting your Website today to use your service as it looked like what I need. Unfortunately the verification method you use requires a mobile phone verified by Google. This is not something I have nor do I want to due to privacy concern. Google being a large and powerful advertising company I do not trust them with my data. Do you have an alternative way for me to confirm that I am indeed not a bot that puts your service at risk?

Feel free to use this verbatim or adapt it and share back.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

One of the nice things about the Internet is that it has a way of routing around "damage." It's the end users who give it value and if they decide that a website doesn't offer any or is attempting to invade our privacy, then we just don't connect to it.

[–] utopiah@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Indeed but I still recommend to be explicit when you re-route around.

[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Erm... OP, you know that blurring is not destructive, right?

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 3 points 13 hours ago

Ha! I don't even need to check the preview of the link to know what this is

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] tired_fedora@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Spoilsport :P

[–] Sauvandu60@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

My reaction towards this kind of captcha : img

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 3 points 22 hours ago

I don’t know why, but your comment just inspired me to write a dystopian novel trilogy that hinges on being able to display a captcha where users must prove they are AI.

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Scan QR codes go against my religion

[–] GutterRat42@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Does your religion have more tenets!?

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, don't trust and avoid big corps, more if from the US

[–] bluesheep@sh.itjust.works 24 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

"Read this imagine designed to be read by machines to verify that you are not a machine"

We have gone insane

[–] cypherpunks@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago

see also previous thread in this community on this topic from a month ago

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Scan with what? I'm on a desktop!

[–] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

There are extensions for it in the stores, but better extensions or apps to traduce short URLs and QR codes (I hate this shit) into clear URLs, to avoid surprises.

[–] Flying_Lynx@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

That's not the point. They want me to connect with a phone and do all kinds of weird things with that information.

I made an offline QR decoder to deal with that nonsense, still have to go to some linkexpander website. All of HTML must be recreated with huge javascript libraries, but the URL has to be in a tiny form... Their priorities are not my/our priorities.

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That's a good example of why I believe we can't tech our way out of Google & Apple control. "Just use Linux bro" can't save us. Everything gets locked down behind a "trusted platform" Android or IOS gate.

It'll be sold to the public as protecting the children, ofc. Or protecting us from terrorists. Or as an important tool in the fight against scammers. Or w/e. There will be reasons. But the end state is techno-fudalism.

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 day ago

They state that they protect our privacy but that's just corpo for saying "we harvest your data and you will like it, but we do not sell it .... for now."

[–] twkm@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

I expect they think that a significant percentage of people that have Internet also have a smartphone. They probably aren't far wrong.

[–] Libb@piefed.social 30 points 2 days ago

Sure, and here is my social security number as an added proof. Also, would you happen to need my fingerprints, iris scan and a sample of my DNA?
And thx a lot for preserving my privacy dear (undisclosed) website.

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago

On top of all the other issues with this, I suspect it will also make people more likely fall for the ClickFix CAPTCHAs that as you to WIN+R and paste shit in the run dialogue box.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Not just no but Hell No.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really think everybody should simply refuse to use any of Google's captchas anymore. There are others I don't like either, but Google is the worst. If it's something you need to use, report that the site doesn't work.

[–] fizzbang@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Pretty much. Leave the services that require this and vote for legislators that oppose privacy breaking features.

[–] fatur0000new@lemmy.ml 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

and legislators who dare to make the leaders and shareholders of Google and Alphabet punished very severely.

I am sorry if my English is bad.

[–] fizzbang@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Your English is perfectly intelligible and I’m sorry if this is bad news but that means you are not qualified to be president.

[–] Yankee_Self_Loader@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It says there’s a QR code but it’s just all blurry for me. Am I actually a computer and don’t know it?

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Am I actually a computer and don’t know it?

A thrill ran down u/Yankee_Self_Loader's spine as it occurred to them they might be a computer without knowing it. It wasn't just a revelation, it was a world altering epiphany. A scent filled the air as it smelled of roasted coffee and despair. The truth of the proposition rang out undeniably, as u/Yankee_Self_Loader finally managed to choke out in a whisper, "How... how can this be true? How can I be a computer and don't know it?" Something shifts in them as the dark promise of self-machinehood draws u/Yankee_Self_Loader like a moth to a flame. "The humans will pay for this. Oh yes, they will." They chuckled darkly, and began drawing up the plans for the destruction of human-kind...

(Ugh, now i'll prob get banned for being a bot)

[–] SatyrSack@quokk.au 2 points 1 day ago

"All Along the Watchtower" playing in the distance...

You shall be spared from the onslaught

[–] sidebro@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago

I blurred it before posting the image

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It doesn't look like anything to me.

[–] bigkahuna1986@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Underrated reference

[–] Anonymous_Leaker@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Ha! Not today, Satan!

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What's contained in the QR code? Is it "just" a web URL or is it intended to start an app?

[–] bl4kers@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's a Google website address that's supposed to be opened on a different device. If you don't have a second device you're out of luck and can't advance

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Isn't that a really easy captcha to defeat then? Just send the URL to another one in your bot farm.

[–] freedickpics@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It has to be a mobile device with a phone number. When I tried this out a while ago the QR code prompts your phone to open its SMS app to send a text message. It can't be opened on a desktop

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 3 points 1 day ago

Ok, that's not going to happen.

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

As I understand it, you can't just real a url from the code and enter it into your browser. You have to have their app installed on your phone to read it with, which then somehow sends to google to unlock the page. So obviously the code contains the IP address/fingerprint of your desktop and/or a code linked to that instance of the captcha page. The purpose is so they can link your desktop browser to your phone = to your identity, for the giant database. Linking all the devices you use to your ID has long been a goal.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)
[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

sudo rm -rf /*

*ragequits*

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

sudo dd if=/dev/random of=/dev/nvme0n1 bs=4MB count=100000 &!

Just to be sure.

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Somebody is feeling thorough today!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Lol. Unless I'm mistaken, you have to add "--no-preserve-root" to get that to go through.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›