this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
299 points (99.0% liked)

politics

30109 readers
2829 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump’s administration is threatening to withdraw federal funding for unemployment assistance in all 50 states as part of the president’s nationwide campaign against “fraud” in government spending.

In a letter to the governors of 53 states and territories, acting Labor Secretary Keith Sonderling warned that the federal government would use “every available tool” to combat “waste, fraud and abuse” within state-run unemployment insurance programs, including “withholding administrative funds from states” for the first time in history.

There is no single national program for unemployment support, though the federal government partners with state agencies to support temporary financial assistance to out-of-work Americans. Nearly 2 million people are currently receiving those benefits, while roughly 229,000 people are filing initial jobless claims every week, according to the Labor Department.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 1 points 7 minutes ago

I don’t know why this is a surprise to anyone. Trump is famous for not paying contractors and workers. He waits it out until they sue and his expensive lawyers beep the plaintiffs dry or settle for some fraction of the contract price.

[–] ZapBeebz_@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

This stunt actually has nothing to do with "fraud" in government spending, but as someone with experience in government procurement, contracting is where the waste is. The government actually doesn't do too badly when we keep the work in-house. It's these multimillion dollar contracts to some private company that are where the waste, fraud, and abuse are. Go fucking audit SpaceX. Revisit those contracts. Bet we can save billions every year on just one companies stupid fucking defense contracts. Then go after the rest of these contractors. Threaten to bring the work back in house and see how they react. Follow through and actually bring the work back in house, build the public sector engineering and manufacturing expertise, and see where we are.

[–] zergtoshi@lemmy.world 2 points 15 minutes ago

Contracting as in having the reflection pool painted?

[–] f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 hour ago

Be careful. Facts, logic, and common sense will only get you on a gov't watchlist these days.

[–] minorkeys@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 hours ago

Good do it. Let the states that still have a sense of sanity group up and implement a multistate unemployment assistance strategy. Seriously, perhaps its time blue states encourage the disempowerment of the federal government and transfer those programs to mutually aligned state initiatives. Leave out all the welfare red states and redirect that transfer of wealth from blue states to red states, back to their own ppl. Americas system of statehood and states rights is something dems should probably start proposing making more use of. If feds under Trump don't want social programs then build multistate programs that serve that function, leaving out the Maga central states altogether.

[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 19 points 3 hours ago

It’s like they are testing limits. They keep doing crazier shit week after week then say well no one is doing anything about it so let’s keep going.

[–] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Trump admin: "DUUUUH I WUNDER IF DIS WILL HELP PEOPLE" pushes the Hurt People buuton

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 6 points 2 hours ago

Fuck it, let him. I'm so sorry for all the innocents this will impact, but I'm so over this "I'm going to do something terrible to my own supporters, maybe." Shit.

Let him year down all the shit his supporters have become reliant on, but have no clue.

Fuck 'em all. Die mad and broke you pieces of shit.

[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 hours ago

All the fraud is in his home and with his friends. Even if all the people receiving benefits were making fraudulent claims, it would probably amount to less than he and his family are grifting from the US governemnt this year.

[–] chahn.chris@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

Do they like riots and open rebellion, because letting people starve is how you get riots and open rebellions…

[–] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

That’s what they want.

[–] 100_kg_90_de_belin@feddit.it 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Let us revenge this with our pikes, ere we become rakes: for the gods know I speak this in hunger for bread, not in thirst for revenge.

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 166 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The waste fraud and abuse are coming from inside the house.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 29 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

And the senate, and the White House, and mar a lago

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

I'm not sure you're getting the reference.

Wow, you may be the only one who gets very popular cultural references.

[–] ryper@lemmy.ca 8 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

They could have been thinking of the House part of Congress, since they only listed the Senate.

[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 31 minutes ago

I'm fairly certain that's what they were thinking.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BucketBong@p.hobo.social 16 points 4 hours ago (5 children)

Are we at the beheading part of history yet?

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

He just had dinner at Versailles, home of Marie Antoinette.

He's had numerous "Let them eat cake moments," most recently his "I love the Inflation" moment, and sooner or later he's going to cross the wrong line when the timing is right, and he'll meet the same fate.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

I think he said "these things happen" in relation to the price of tickets - possibly even more recently than the idiotic inflation comment.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ObsidianZed@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

Currently on unemployment thanks to the tech industry. I wonder what my trump loving family members will think when I bring this up the next time they ask me how the job hunt is going.

[–] buddascrayon@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Knowing Trump fans, they're going to say it's a good thing, it'll make you get up and get a job sooner rather than laying around "wasting time on the government dime". Cause they all probably believe it's very easy to get another job.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

Was going to say the same thing. Besides, if they know you don't support PEDOnald, they'll take it as your comeuppance.

I've had a conservative in-law tell me that maybe I should not be getting by financially, and that was implied as part of the problem under Biden - that I was doing okay. Because I went to college, etc. No, I should be doing less well and that would mean things were properly balanced or something. That somehow PEDOnald didn't "get" people like me the first time around and somehow harmed me and others like me (meaning, again, someone who went to college) - and maybe not only financially and that hopefully that would be different in his second term.

It's just as fucked as it sounds. Did this in-law think it through and realize it would harm not only my kids, but his direct blood relative? If he did, he didn't give a fuck, apparently.

If you aren't conservative and don't support Donvict, you deserve to suffer, in their worldview.

[–] Eh_I@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

"Have you asked ChatGPT for help finding a job?"

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

When he breaks California, I hope the red states will like living in cardboard boxes and eating dirt.

[–] YiddishMcSquidish@lemmy.today 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Seriously. He wants to destroy the United States by having blue, wealthy, supportive states succeed. Then let's see how his supporters pull themselves up by their own boot straps and levitate.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

You mean fail?

[–] ZeroCool@piefed.ca 92 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

“The American people will no longer tolerate the blatant waste, fraud and abuse of their hard-earned tax dollars — no state should allow it either,”

Excuse me? If anything, the 2024 election made it crystal clear that the American people will, in fact, tolerate the blatant waste, fraud, and abuse of our hard-earned tax dollars. 77 million people actually voted for it.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

Yeah and what about that $300B in taxpayer dollars we're giving to Iran? Seems like the definition of waste, fraud, and abuse.

[–] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 25 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

they even published a fucking playbook called project 2025.

dumbfucks

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But they super promised they never even heard of it or was going to use it. Then installed its writers in key positions. Purely by happenstance.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

One of the things I hated so much about the 2024 election was all the fucking gaslighting about it, too. There were plenty saying "isn't that just a liberal conspiracy theory" and bullshit about "blue maga" (lol, whatever) and lots of the corporate media doing that sort of collective shrug about a documented plan.

[–] WatDabney@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 7 hours ago (13 children)

Trump and the Republicans want to kill poor people.

[–] grimpy@lemmy.myserv.one 29 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

& they are succeeding, worldwide

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago

And you know what happens? This makes the next group of people, i.e. middle class, the next poors! Guess what they want to do to the new poors?

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 hours ago

Who do they think the rich will live off of then?

Or maybe they haven’t thought that far ahead.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] alexc@lemmy.world 49 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Waste and fraud… If only someone hadn’t started a war with Iran and then paid them $300B three months later to end it, gaining precisely nothing…

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 23 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

And spent 14 million painting a pool blue?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 52 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

How do empires die?

Gradually then suddenly.

The US is in the latter stage.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (5 children)

They want you so desperate to cling to employment that you will no longer care about working conditions or fair wages or be willing to endanger said employment by being politically active.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago

Cool. Do it. I cannot wait to see what happens before he realizes that his base are beneficiaries of unemployment.

load more comments
view more: next ›