this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
154 points (98.1% liked)

Global News

6678 readers
376 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination is will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Half of Americans now use AI chatbots, up from 33% in the summer of 2024.

Archived version: https://archive.is/newest/https://gizmodo.com/just-16-of-americans-believe-ai-will-positively-impact-society-pew-poll-finds-2000773112


Disclaimer: The article linked is from a single source with a single perspective. Make sure to cross-check information against multiple sources to get a comprehensive view on the situation.

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Probably the only beneficial AI are open source. Are there such any?

[–] Insekticus@aussie.zone 0 points 4 hours ago

I think there was once ... but the billionaires got to it.

[–] Collatz_problem@hexbear.net 6 points 9 hours ago

Luckily, the United States is a democratic society, where the opinion of the majority has tangible influence on policy.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 8 points 10 hours ago

And most of those are probably higher ups at the big corporations.

Trust me. I know. The more you go up the ladder the more deluded they become.

Almost like AI psychosis is a reflection of corporate yes man psychosis.

[–] Airfried@piefed.social 12 points 11 hours ago

US citizens are far less optimistic about AI than about Donald fucking Trump.

[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 19 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

15% of Americans are trying to sell something AI.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 7 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Nah, it's probably just 10% to 12%. There are always some people that will say the most absurd things in a poll, either for trolling or because they got something wrong.

[–] gankouskhan@piefed.zip 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Might just be the people who fall on their knees to suck off billionaires

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 10 hours ago

You could ask if elephants run beaver pelt farms on the moon, and you'll still get some people saying yes

[–] fizzle@quokk.au 1 points 7 hours ago

There's definitely a can vs should conversation that our society seems incapable of.

"wow look at this terrible thing we're collectively doing. It's a shame we can't just... you know... not do that but oh well."

[–] nik9000@programming.dev 5 points 11 hours ago

In the Alpha Cenauri game there was a wonder you could build called The Longevity Vaccine. If you were a planned economy two sad citizens were made happy at every city. Amazing. If you were Green economy it made happy one per base. Amazing.

If you were capitalists, the base that built it made a bunch of money and nothing else. It's a lot of money, but isn't global.

It's the only wonder like that. And I've been thinking of it more lately.

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 9 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

We don't like it, we don't think that it is good for us, but we still use it.

Sounds like drugs to me, no?

[–] Rooster326@programming.dev 11 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

Idk my boss never required me to use drugs.

Put up a leaderboard

Congratulations to Kyle for doing all the drugs! Better luck next month everyone else

[–] vivalapivo@lemmy.today 1 points 4 hours ago

Drugs make you productive, so in some places like south asia employees are praised for doing them.

[–] uuj8za@piefed.social 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh. We have a leaderboard and now in our self employee reviews we have to answer:

How has AI improved your productivity? Where do you see future opportunities?

And I have to make something up. I can't answer that it hasn't helped. I don't want to get fired.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago

Eh, drugs tend to start out fun, then stop being fun when they take over your life. AI sucks balls right out of the gate.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 2 points 10 hours ago

Management at the horrible mega-corp I work at is extremely frothy about AI. They just did a big all-hands where they said they want 100% adoption of AI. Whatever that means.

[–] millie@beehaw.org 4 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

I wonder what the results would have been if they hadn't combined "very" and "somewhat" results. There's a lot of nuance there that would still be poorly reflected with a gradient, so removing it seems like an odd decision.

Most of the people I talk to about AI seem to either think it has potential but is often being poorly utilized, or they dislike it entirely. I don't know too many people who are unequivocally positive about it. Maybe they're right-wingers.

[–] Nioxic@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 13 hours ago

Ah yes

Pew poll

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

Wonder what the numbers would be on the Internet positively impacting society, as AI has a lot of the same harms and benefits of the Internet. It gives people easy access to a lot more information, but it also gives them access to a lot more bullshit.

Even after we've had years for it fully develop IDK if I'd say the Internet is positively impacting society.

[–] PoopingCough@lemmy.world 10 points 11 hours ago

10 years ago i would have said the internet was absolutely a net positive. The internet today is not like what it used to be. But i think that's way more because of late stage capitalism than it is the concept/technology of the internet itself. LLMs as a concept/technology have very few use cases that can positively impact society imo.

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Wonder what the numbers would be on the Internet positively impacting society, as AI has a lot of the same harms and benefits of the Internet.

This is a ridiculous comparison. GenAI has practically zero use case compared to the internet and it's benefits to economic and logistical planning and communications. How the hell do you even come up with this take? We have already reached diminishing returns on advancement, meanwhile all these datacenters are massive resource drains with literally 0 benefit to society.

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

I think it's a good comparison.

The main benefit of the Internet is that it gives easy access to near limitless information. The basic Google use case of the Internet, I type in a question and get a link to an answer, whether that's a reddit thread, stack overflow, wiki article etc.

Whether you like it or not people are increasingly using LLMs for these sort of basic "factual" questions. Yes they can lie/hallucinate, so can someone on reddit, but most of the time they are correct and that's good enough for most people.

The problem with both is when we take them to seriously. It is common knowledge that both LLMs and the Internet can lie or bullshit you. When you lose sight of that fact and believe an internet community or personality or an LLM knows the world better then your own sense, it becomes a problem. And honestly the people who get AI psychosis are far less dangerous to society then some racist asshole who lost his mind on 4chan.

[–] Johnny_Arson@hexbear.net 2 points 8 hours ago

People like you are the reason people hate AI. Both are painfully confidently wrong.