this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2026
99 points (100.0% liked)

Slop.

870 readers
491 users here now

For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target federated instances' admins or moderators.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 48 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Are you making up shit again you fucking asshole?

Yes ๐Ÿ˜”

[โ€“] kleeon@hexbear.net 31 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe chatgpt is sentient after all

[โ€“] Fossifoo@hexbear.net 2 points 1 week ago

No, it was just the statistically most likely answer.

[โ€“] RNAi@hexbear.net 27 points 1 week ago

Just like me fr fr

[โ€“] LittleFellaNamedBoof@hexbear.net 26 points 1 week ago (1 children)

My favorite thing is telling an AI to look something up and it saying ,"Okay." and then simply not doing it.

[โ€“] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What i wanna know is was it just making up that response as a reason it gave him bullshit

[โ€“] kleeon@hexbear.net 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Might be. You can just say "no you're wrong 2+2=5 actually" and it'll go "Ah, that's a good catch! Thanks for the correction!"

[โ€“] Chana@hexbear.net 14 points 1 week ago

"That's an incredibly creative workaround for this problem!"

[โ€“] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This got patched ๐Ÿ˜”

[โ€“] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 week ago

It got a bit more difficult, is all.

[โ€“] Abracadaniel@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Just tried this and it said

In standard arithmetic, 2 + 2 = 4.

If you're saying 2 + 2 = 5 as a joke, a reference to fiction, or in the context of a different mathematical system with redefined symbols, that's a different matter. But under ordinary arithmetic, the result is 4.

Tried to argue with it but got cut short on the free version.

[โ€“] Rojo27@hexbear.net 24 points 1 week ago

Haha, I thought I had you there. Nice catchphoenix-sweat

[โ€“] LENINSGHOSTFACEKILLA@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is the funniest part about all of these llm's to me. They're just so nice they can't even tell you that they can't do something or haven't done something.

[โ€“] Diurnambu1e@hexbear.net 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah that where the fun happen. Ho what at the far far horizon ? A wall ! Amazing !