this post was submitted on 14 Jun 2026
213 points (99.5% liked)

politics

30186 readers
2924 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 67 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The stupidity is not that Trump wants to do this

The stupidity is that behaviour like this has been normalized by the American public and American leadership

They're all taking steps to degrading and destroying themselves and no one ever wants to do much to stop it.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 21 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Fewer than half of the US states have recall elections

https://ballotpedia.org/States_where_state_legislators_can_be_recalled

Same for voter-initiated ballot initiatives

https://ballotpedia.org/States_with_initiative_or_referendum

edit: I clarified this in a comment below, but for voter-initiated ballot initiatives I only meant for passing new legislation (21 states). If you also count state constitutional amendments and vetoing legislation then there are 26 states.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

30 some states have voter sponsored ballot initiatives, most are constitutional amendments, a few are just statutory, I've never heard of recalling a legislature with that process, which takes over a year to make happen, from getting signatures from voters, getting those validated, having electoral commissions ok the vote, then waiting for the actual vote.

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

the link I posted says 26 states have voter-initiated ballot measures, but 5 of those 26 only allow for constitutional amendments or vetoing statutes, not writing new statutes which I should have been more clear is what I was referring to.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

It appears you are correct, I had read 30 some, but all enshitified search is giving me is 26, as is now the case, all sources provided are citing the same statitstic it appears, the sources being machine written by and large.

It islikely not incorrect in this case, just saying, search sucks now, I know it can work better, because it did. Google eats bags of diseased geriatric flacid dicks. It's gross. Like, if you want to eat bags of dicks, they could do better. But I digress.

[–] Flames5123@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

The Mississippi one is crazy. I voted in that ballot initiative when I lived there. It was for medical marijuana with very lax laws. But then the mayor of the richest county in the state took it to court. The ballot initiative even got the required votes in all the old districts too, planning for this, but the Supreme Court of MS is as dumb as a bag of rocks. Did the state repeal the voter ID law or the new flag that were both passed the same way? Hell no!

So glad I left that ass-backwards state.

[–] Arancello@aussie.zone 10 points 1 week ago

… “won’t someone rid me of this damn ~~priest~~ or politician

[–] Maiq@piefed.social 45 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Impeach that fascist fuck!

[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

High velocity impeachment.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Acute lead poisoning

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 2 points 1 week ago

Luigi's Mansion could use more ghosts.

[–] notso@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

with extreme prejudice

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's easy to laugh at his stupidity and tantrums

People should be concerned about his tame DOJ and other jurisdictions falsifying charges against those who he hates

If I were a gambling man, I would wager that there will be arrests before too long

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Indictiments will come down on dem frontrunners around fall 2027 or thereabouts I figured. False election rigging and or whatever else they can come up with.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 1 week ago

Pretty easy to frame someone else for cheating while you're cheating. Not sure how this didn't occur to me until now as an option for midterms. Attribution is famously bullshit in cyber like economics in math or chiropractics in medicine.

F.

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

How your wagers doing since 2016

[–] FistingEnthusiast@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm so sick of being right about things

It's fucking depressing

[–] unemployedclaquer@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I haven't seen anyone talking down on fisting, lately, the last 5 minuets. That's gotta be good for an enthusiast

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Fingers pointed or clenched is the real question

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Didn't Hitler do the same thing?

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

This is kinda how Saddam took power

Christopher Hitchens retelling of how Saddam took power is nuts.

https://youtu.be/OynP5pnvWOs

[–] oppy1984 1 points 1 week ago

Well with Saddam it was more of an execution, but I get where you're going.

[–] SomethingWentWrong@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 week ago (6 children)

If Trump does (tries to do) that wouldn't it be an impeachable offense?

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Impeachable offense?!? Are you serious? This dude needs to be DEPOSED AND IMPRISONED not impeached.

We are so fucked if people still think this way

[–] baronvonj@piefed.social 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

He has to be impeached and removed before he can legally be indicted for anything in order to then be deposed and imprisoned.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yes following the law is very important, so republicans will accept it...

[–] Blibly@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

Impeachable offense? Just add it to the pile FFS.

More like he'd deserve a firing squad.

[–] BonsaiBoo@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I’m not sure declaring his enemies in a constitutionally separate branch of government as “fired” counts as a high crime or misdemeanor, but if he tries to falsely imprison them or impede their official duties it sure is.

[–] OwOarchist@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago

counts as a high crime or misdemeanor

That's the fun part. Congress decides what high crimes and misdemeanors are. If they want to, they can impeach and remove him for picking his nose. Anything they can get enough votes for will count.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Add it to the pile. Though the pile is kinda pointless when they aren't impeaching him for any of it.

[–] A404@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

He literally got away with insurrection

[–] Steve@startrek.website 1 points 1 week ago

You silly bitch

[–] GuyFawkesV@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

I mean at this point the Republican reps allowing this to continue are actively engaged in this treason. They’ll need to be held just as culpable as the admin.

[–] santa@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago

That’s not a thing.

[–] WatDabney@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 week ago

I can just see him laying on the floor of the Oval Office, pounding his little fists and kicking his little feet and crying, "But I want to expeeeeeeeeeeel him!!"

[–] turdburglar@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago

cool. we kinda want to expel you too, fuck knob.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

“Expel”

But he can't - esp. not across party lines. Last time I looked the US government still called itself democratic.

But it's becoming the normal way of doing politics over there? At least for his constituency I guess. They really believe POTUS should have the right to do this Expelling. It not being possible then becomes an example of how the other side "weaponizes" the law.

I like that "deranged" is now a standard adjective in most any Trump article.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We're in fascism times.

Trump can legally kill people. Literally. He can point a gun in 5th Avenue and shoot someone and New York Court, SCOTUS, and his base, will all let him.

We cannot make arguments as if laws apply to this man because they simply don't.

So when he says words like "expel", we need to understand that he will try everything in his power, including things that are illegal to normal people like you and me, to accomplish his will.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Trump can legally kill people.

I think that's hyperbole, but yeah, that SCOTUS ruling was and still is pretty horrifying.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Buddy, we are through the looking glass.

He can do pretty much whatever the fuck he wants because nobody is stopping him.

Watch him literally "deport" these people

[–] Steve@startrek.website 5 points 1 week ago

Expel deez nuts. Pedo.

[–] homes@piefed.world 4 points 1 week ago

Yeah, I’m sure he does, lol

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Here's an idea; the world should expel Trump.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Do it. Seriously. We need something to happen so we can start getting rid of that fat bastard.

[–] Curious_Canid@piefed.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Have you noticed that most headlines about something ridiculous Trump says (which is everything Trump says) put his actual words in quotes? That's because the words he uses don't mean anything in the real world. Trump can't "expel" representatives.

Trump doesn't know, or care, what the laws actually say. He just says what he wants to happen and hopes that it will magically happen. Or, occasionally, he will illegally use an arm of the executive branch to try to make one of these things happen.

I appreciate the press calling these out, to the extent of the quotes, but it would be nice if they would provide a little more context. Something like:
Trump Wants to "Expel" Representatives Who Threaten to Impeach Him But He Can't

[–] freely1333@reddthat.com 1 points 1 week ago

We don’t know if he can’t until he tries or really until he’s out of office and can’t keep trying. If I had a nickel for everything the Dems told me Trump couldn’t do that he did I would have enough of bribe them to support universal healthcare.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

Is this elementary school?

[–] newton@feddit.online 1 points 1 week ago

And losing the war with Iran ,O dear

load more comments
view more: next ›