this post was submitted on 12 Jun 2026
516 points (99.8% liked)

politics

30048 readers
1838 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“While Susan Collins’ campaign is backed by billionaire donors, our campaign is built on a movement funded by the people, with an average donation of $26,” said Graham Platner’s campaign manager.

A new analysis of campaign finance data shows that nearly 100 billionaires and their spouses have contributed to Republican Sen. Susan Collins’ reelection bid so far, funneling nearly $10 million to the incumbent’s campaign committee and PACs supporting her effort to fend off progressive challenger Graham Platner.

The Maine Monitor on Thursday published a list of billionaires who have donated to Collins and Platner, who has called his Republican opponent a “corrupt” protector and beneficiary of an oligarchic political system.

The outlet noted that Collins’ billionaire donation total “stands in stark contrast with the fundraising of her opponent... whose campaign has mostly attracted smaller amounts of funds but from many more people.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

Kill the rich, save the poor. Taxation, is not enough for the current era. There must be justice for the crimes committed. Once they are dead, then we can figure out how to run the world without capitalism. Untill then, the elimination of the ultra-rich by any means should be the goal. Everything else is noise.

It would be nice to have a post-conflict plan TBH. But yeah, whatever the plan, that would be step 1

[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Seems like a short sighted plan. Not much changed after what happened to the CEO of UHC insurance.

[–] Bluedragon012@lemmy.world 0 points 34 minutes ago

It'll hit different when it's all of them. 1 ceo death is not enough for change. Now go take your noise somewhere else.

[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

We need term limits in Congress.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

No. 40 years ago we needed term limits in congress. An ounce of prevention on time is worth a shipping container of 7.68 when the problem has gotten stupid.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 minutes ago

The best time to plant a tree, and all that...

[–] 5wim@infosec.pub 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 16 minutes ago

I could swear that's what I typed.

[–] jestho@lemmy.zip 2 points 7 hours ago

You need a lot more than that, American

[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

BUT these Billionaires CARE about Us! THATS why they're FORCING us to Invest ALL OUR RETIREMENT into Their Companies so they can be Trillionaires!

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 6 hours ago

But you can't shop lift! Think about the employees and small business people who will suffer!

[–] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Hey, now. Susan Collins is very concerned about all the billionaire money in politics. Very concerned. Almost very, very concerned. Right on the edge.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 4 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

She's not happy about it, but in the end, after wrestling with her conscience, she will take their money, but she's not happy about it, and she'll do whatever they tell her to do, but she's not happy about it.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

She must be a very unhappy woman.

[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 2 points 36 minutes ago

Those pearls don't clutch themselves.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Does Stephen King's recommendation carry any weight? Has he made a statement regarding this? Maybe he's smart to stay out of it.

[–] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today -2 points 8 hours ago

The Epstein Island pedophile Stephen King who wrote CSEM multiple times?

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world -1 points 7 hours ago

The election won't change anything. Republicans will remain in power, the Tr*mp family will establish a ruling dynasty, and Democrats will express moderate concern.

[–] demizerone@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

Let them waste their money. Mainers are not stupid. Can't be said for my home state of CA unfortunately...

[–] robocall@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Let's interview everyone that has a grudge with Susan Collins.

No? We can only interview every ex girlfriend, guy that's willing to say something negative, and Republican friend of a friend that knows the grassroots guy. Huh, I wonder why.

load more comments
view more: next ›