I'm not sure how the parks around me are making money but I also don't care. I want there to be parks and am happy to pay towards that regardless of their profitability. It's certainly a better use of my money than paying for more surveillance or tax breaks for corporations.

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Typically when a government program talks about returns on dollars spent it’s not so much about the profitability (government walking away with more dollars than they put in) as much as community benefits that lead to cost savings within the greater economy. In this case the return is in health cost savings, as parks are a place community members can go to exercise for free, directly improving their physical health and therefore reducing their need for healthcare, saving money spent on healthcare for the community as a whole.

[–] dbdr@nord.pub 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Improving both physical and mental health.

[–] jaycifer@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

That’s true, I just didn’t want to overcomplicate my explanation with something that’s a little more difficult to calculate than physical healthcare saved.

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago

Nice - infinite free money trick!

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 3 points 5 days ago

Even if you own a home near a park but never visit it, you’re benefiting economically