this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2026
54 points (93.5% liked)

Technology

43037 readers
114 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] p03locke@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 hours ago

People seem to forget that, 15-20 years ago, 95% of email was spam. It's gone down since then, but only because email isn't that important of a communication platform nowadays.

Bad actors attack with the tools they've got. If it's not protected, it's exploitable until it is.

[–] Kissaki@beehaw.org 3 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

lol, when you change the graph filter from HTML to JSON, it's 60% human.

  • HTML - 40% humans
  • JSON - 60% humans
[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Bots are, essentially, a virus. We are at the point now where they are killing the host. That is if they haven't already moved us to the point of no return.

A new internet isn't going to happen. We are stuck with the anonymous rage inducing or monetization system that took over because the systems of power let it.

[–] I_am_10_squirrels@beehaw.org 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I2P. Not perfect, but a good place to start.

[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I2P doesn't seem to fill the void. I think what is missing from that is the "norm" of the old internet. The internet was a playground with tons of hobby projects and experiments in its earlier days. I don't see TOR, I2P, etc, building the same playground because the novelty and ease of access can't be replicated.

[–] kaedon@beehaw.org 2 points 3 hours ago

Another community that has sprung up recently is Reticulum. Some of the relay chats rooms, websites and forums on there feel like the early internet and the emphasis on direct communication over radios could prevent bots. But it's definitely not ready as an internet replacement. Maybe in a few years...

[–] megopie@beehaw.org 7 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

I’m constantly getting bot checked these days because I do a lot of stuff when casually browsing to prevent being fingerprinted and tracked between sites. I wonder how often they just mark anyone not making them selves easy to identify as a bot.

[–] maggio@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

I can't buy flights with SAS anymore because they flag me as a bot. Tried contacting customer support about it, which was a bot

[–] its_me_xiphos@beehaw.org 6 points 6 hours ago

AI customer service bots, which I know are soulless firewalls really more than helpers, are beyond frustrating.

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 3 points 9 hours ago

There are probably not many of us though.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 5 points 13 hours ago

Dead Internet Fact

[–] kbal@fedia.io 16 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

I wonder how Cloudflare estimates the increased rate of false positives they're getting after they made their bot detector even more oversensitive in recent weeks. It no longer likes my default javascript-enabled browser profile and I don't always bother to load another one when I get cloudflared, so >50% of visits from me are "bots".

[–] Segab@beehaw.org 2 points 2 hours ago

Doesn't CloudFlare also have a vested interest in saying bot traffic has overtaken humans to encourage website owners to their services?

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 21 hours ago

I wonder how much of it is people who just block cloudflare or don't use JavaScript.

[–] chahk@beehaw.org 8 points 19 hours ago

Internet of Shit

[–] OpenStars@piefed.social 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Bots are humans, at least in the sense that bots are initiated by humans.

So when a human's tools misbehave, the human should be held accountable (except that's not feasible).

Seen in this light, the entire internet is literally now under attack.

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 15 points 15 hours ago

Bots are not humans, but their creators should still be held accountable.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 0 points 22 hours ago

The question is if Iran's massive percent of Bots is because it has a lot of bots or if its humans just largely lack internet access.