I don’t understand why this statement is limited to just AI companies
this post was submitted on 02 Jun 2026
39 points (91.5% liked)
news
999 readers
1 users here now
A lightweight news hub to help decentralize the fediverse load: mirror and discuss headlines here so the giant instance communities aren’t a single choke-point.
Rules:
- Recent news articles only (past 30 days)
- Title must match the headline or neutrally describe the content
- Avoid duplicates & spam (search before posting; batch minor updates).
- Be civil; no hate or personal attacks.
- No link shorteners
- No entire article in the post body
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
It has to start somewhere. I don't understand why perfect is always the enemy of making literally any progress at all.
Excellent point. All i meant was I hope that this is applied more with regard to future industries.
If these assholes get a bailout we need to fucking nationalise them.
Those companies don't generate any wealth...
at some point ai is probly going to be good enough to really take jobs so it would be nice to have some way to have companies pay in some form
Doubt it. People far too much underestimate human subjective experiences
ok, people are going to be dumb enough to get ai to do human jobs and it would be nice if all that money that could have went to people gets horded
Sure America will do, the same way started countless wars to get their oil. What was every time ? The middle east is the enemy? They started it ? Fuck off.
What is this? Why not just tax them? I am not interested in bailing out AI companies.
This is just Andrew Yang’s universal basic income idea but worse
Andrew Yang's universal basic income idea
Can't tell if Mussolini or Deng.
Yes.
Gross