this post was submitted on 26 May 2026
83 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2505 readers
1028 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great News Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Only 50 years behind schedule. πŸ‘

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This won't happen under the Trump administration.

[–] ilinamorato@lemmy.world 8 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He wants his name on it, so he actually apparently really pushed Isaacman to make it happen before he's out of office. Of course, that's not possible, so who knows how much he cares anymore.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

He definitely intends to still be in office whenever it finally happens.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I wonder what the bookies would give you on that bet because there's a very good chance he'll be dead before the end of his presidency.

[–] Rambomst@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

Better late than never I guess?

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 17 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Permanent moon base for ??? But no universal heslthcare.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Haha. That won’t ever happen in America.

[–] Psionicsickness@reddthat.com 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This. I don’t know why people ever even talk about universal healthcare. If it ever happened here, the place wouldn’t be called the USA. Not even worth talking about it, 0.0000000% chance of EVER happening.

[–] kibblebits@quokk.au 3 points 4 months ago

To make it happen would require a massive bloody revolution where the rich are executed and thousands of corrupt people are imprisoned for treason.

That’s as likely as China becoming actually communist and getting rid of state capitalism and state approved oligarchs.

Or, Russians finally not falling out of windows on a daily basis.

Never gonna happen.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 4 months ago

That's like saying it's impossible to end slavery in America. Or it's impossible America would ever bow down to Russia.

Both of which have happened various points in history.

[–] RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

The moon base is for insurance CEOs to hide from people that are not getting the health care they are paying through their noses for.

They can afford it cause they are not paying for their customers health care.

[–] douz0a0bouz@midwest.social 1 points 4 months ago

I don't think so. Human bodies weren't made for 0g. The CEO's would likely stay here and send the poor's to the moon to work the mines.

[–] Deceptichum@quokk.au 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Whiteys living on the moon.

[–] switcheroo@lemmy.world 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don't want to look up at the moon and see that bullshit. You know the Epstein class tech bros are going to put ADS ON OUR FUCKING MOON.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

They would have to be enormous to be seen from earth. When viewed from earth the moon only has a visual size of approximately 1 cm so the ad would have to be a thousand of kilometres across to just appear miniature from our perspective.

[–] Maelvie@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What if they use giant projectors directed a earth, you would see the ads on the clouds, in the sky! Wouldn't that be awesome?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

That's not how light works. In order to be bright enough to illuminate clouds on earth it would have to be brighter than the sun at its source point because of the Inverse-square law

The techbros already have this idea with a satellite it wouldn't work with that either for exactly the same reasons and the satellite would have been way closer.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago

Coming soon.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)
[–] jnod4@lemmy.ca 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Million times cheaper to launch rockets from the moon than from earth. Easy access to almost an infinite amount of useful materials.

Could easily end wars on earth so we don't fight over some lithium in eastern europe. Or enough materials and batteries replace petrol once it runs out.

And who knows maybe our mars descendants will come back to repopulate earth

[–] hark@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

This is ignoring the massive costs in building, staffing, and maintaining a moon base. There are battery chemistries that do not rely on lithium and even there weren't, we wouldn't need to fight wars over it. The wars are fought in an attempt to control those resources, even if not scarce. Expanding territory does not reduce scarcity when the scarcity is artificial (so that a few can exert control over the many). Also, why would the earth be depopulated while mars somehow thrives?

[–] null@lemmy.org 2 points 4 months ago

Said the haters every time someone pushed the boundaries of science and technology.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 1 points 4 months ago

Because the rotting empire needs to keep up appearances.