this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
296 points (98.4% liked)

News

37798 readers
1999 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 27 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Looks like Disney's ability to keep milking their latest cute plush toy is coming to an end.

[–] BilSabab@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (5 children)

time to create another one. or get back to the old one. Young Yoda it is!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Solitaire20X6@sh.itjust.works 74 points 6 days ago (3 children)

we 👏🏻 don't 👏🏻 have 👏🏻 money 👏🏻 for 👏🏻 movies

[–] ArchsageRamases@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

True and If I do have money to spend on a movie I want something new and good not more milking of starwars witch has become slop.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 days ago (3 children)

starwars witch

I think the Acolyte aeries was dealing with Star wars witches.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bigbangdangler@reddthat.com 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The cost to go with a movie with one friend is around $30-35 where I live. This assumes buying no concessions.

The cost to buy that movie on a physical format (assuming it releases on one) is $20-30 depending on whether that format is DVD or Blu-Ray.

A lot of folks right now could not afford either option. But even for those who can, the math doesn't math on movie theaters.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

And while concessions have been overpriced forever, they've really gone nuts with it recently. I was gonna buy a large bag of popcorn, a bottled water, and 2 sodas and it was gonna be like 50 bucks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 63 points 6 days ago (1 children)

There's a new Star Wars movie?

Bros, you killed the franchise with all the mediocre shit you pumped out. You bought an IP, you drove it into the ground by shoveling out a bunch of cash-grab trash, and now you wonder why people aren't lining up for your new movie?

Are you kidding? There is literally no industry in which this strategy works. walmart might as well put out a special new "locally made" brand on their shelves, and marvel at why people aren't falling over themselves to buy it.

[–] kinther@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The sequels were garbage. I dont think I ever need to watch them again.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Washedupcynic@lemmy.ca 24 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Going to the movies, in THIS economy?

[–] FatVegan@leminal.space 5 points 5 days ago

To watch a disney movie

[–] thermal_shock@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (4 children)

We go once a year. We saw across the spiderverse in 2024, tron ares last year, will see the backrooms soon and the third spiderman next year. It's not worth anymore. I had never seen an imax, so we saw tron in imax, was amazing. But not worth $80 for 2 adults and a child. And we brought our own snacks! I brought beef jerky, kiddo brought something, I don't remember. Shared a drink.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TargaryenTKE@lemmy.world 19 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (11 children)

To be completely honest, I didn't even hear about this movie at all until like 2 weeks ago and I just assumed they'd release it as a Disney+ exclusive or something. I even went to a movie theater like a month ago and I heard absolutely nothing about it. Anecdotally, this tells me their marketing team had no faith in their product, so why should anyone else?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 5 days ago

I had no idea this was being made until just now

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 37 points 6 days ago (2 children)

The Mandalorian was initially meant to be a side series for fans. It was lower budget, practical effects, and little to no core characters from the main franchise. Unfortunately, basically every other Star Wars IP fell flat on its face since then, so by default, The Mandalorian is now the flagship Star Wars storyline. The movie was good as a nice side story for fans, it was bad as a franchise-running blockbuster. It's really amazing how many bad decisions Disney had to make to end up here.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The way the Boba Fett series flopped and tried, repeatedly, to draft on the Mandalorian's success within 1 session...ooofda.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Practical effects? Wasn't pretty much the entire thing filmed in Disney's version of "The Volume"?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/StageCraft

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I went and saw it in theaters. It was pretty good. Not earth shattering, but it just basically felt like a really long episode of the show.

Also, Zeb from Rebels was pretty prominent and I'm a sucker for Rebels characters.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I just assumed it was a streaming movie. Basically just a long episode.

[–] remon@ani.social 7 points 6 days ago (4 children)

It is. But for some reason they released it in cinemas.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] finallymadeanaccount@lemmy.world 16 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It's their own fault. They haven't had a Christmas Special for ages.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] atk007@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Andor is the only star wars property that was in any good, and that's also because they ended it in 2 seasons. The rest are milked into mediocrity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmings.world 14 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Get used to it. Disney is going to grind Star Wars into dust.

[–] Clutter@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago (6 children)

From what I understand, they truly do mean to make the lowest possible content money can buy, cram full of "fan recognizable moments" to make the most amount of money out of it as possible.

As in, that's the goal, on purpose. Not as a "unintended side effect of us just being inept at making anything these days". But just being VERY good at squeezing money from brands like Star Wars.

Just turning out slop. Easy. Comfy. Low content slop. And then sell stuffed Grogu's. Andor was a fluke because the director was able to make something out of nothing. Without ever touching so much as "the force" or even a lightsaber!

We need more of that director.

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago (3 children)

For some of us the ship has already sailed. Episode 8 fundamentally changed the way I think about Star Wars. Before that, I'd already come to the realization that, despite leaning SW in the Star Wars vs Star Trek rivalry, I actually liked ST better. But I still had a love for SW that meant I would be in the theatre to see whatever SW movie was there.

Ep 8 killed that. For the better IMO because it was a stupid obsession, even if it wasn't as strong as it previously was.

I saw Ep 9 in the theatre, but it was more of a symbolic finishing what I started many years prior. My viewing was somehow full of contempt and there was much that fed it. I've watched a bit of the other stuff Disney has put out and it wasn't bad like eps 8 and 9 were, but I just don't care as much anymore.

Like I understand Andor was well done. I might get around to watching it eventually, but I'm in no rush.

Star Wars has gone from an automatic "yes!" to just another franchise, for me at least.

[–] LadyButterfly@reddthat.com 6 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Casual fan, but star wars lost me at episode 2. The original trilogy are a big part of my childhood so I'd have seen the others but can't sit through them. I genuinely like Mandy but lost interest after season 3 and I tried to watch the other shows but just... didn't like them. I know some hardcore fans but even they lost it after the final couple of films

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Skullgrid@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 15 points 6 days ago (4 children)

First time even hearing it exists. Did they bother to market it?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] xSikes@feddit.online 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Didn’t know this was a thing. I thought this trick ended a while ago?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 6 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I didn't hear about it until I saw it on the drive in billboard.

That said, I've not finished season 2, but I loved season 1 enough to get the pinball game :)

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Erna_muse@lemmy.zip 12 points 6 days ago (3 children)

They should've made it a buddy comedy where they do a bunch of drugs.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Did their viewer base ask for a movie? I enjoy the seasonal format but don’t want to see a movie.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] buzz86us@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

Why would I pay good money when it'll be available by August?

[–] S_H_K@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

Dude I liked it I knew everyone's gonna hate it. I knew from the start it wouldn't be a filosofical thing... is Mando for fucks sake he runs trough the galaxy shooting shit and taking care of the kid we got that that's it.
Is it perfect? nope is it bad? nope. But it is entertaining that's all I asked from it, it's my unpopular opinion but that were my expectations.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Shame. It was fine, mid-range Star Wars. On par with the show, which tracks because they condensed season 4 to make this instead.

You could do "best parts" versions of seasons 1-3 and make movies out of them too!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Dagamant@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

This happens when you burn out your fans with constant releases.

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

It wasn't terrible. Not great, but not terrible. Worth watching if you're streaming, but not theater worthy.

[–] WindyRebel@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I personally loved it. It was its own contained side story like Solo was. It showed some evolution for Grogu and Mando was a bad ass.

The biggest complaint I see is that it’s a “longer episode of the show.” Yeah, but so is any Star Trek movie, the Sponge Bob movie, the Simpson’s movie, etc. Anything that’s a TV product that goes to the theater is just a long version of that thing because we are used to the thing on TV. That said, this did not bother me at all as it was enjoyable.

All of the love they added through shots that were based on original Star Wars concept art were very enjoyable. I loved the use of stop motion that was a nod to things like the Rancor from RoTJ. It was filled with awesome creatures, droids, and a connection to the Clone Wars.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›