January 1st, 1970
this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
61 points (86.7% liked)
Linux
65935 readers
787 users here now
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).
Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
- No misinformation
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0
founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
Underrated
Twins!
Yes, right next to the fields for your full name and address, all of which are optional. It’s a total nothingburger.
Did you ignore the comment in the github where it, and I quote "Stores the user's birth date for age verification, as required by recent laws in California (AB-1043), Colorado (SB26-051), Brazil (Lei 15.211/2025), etc.". Yes it is optional NOW, but this is in preparation of laws that make it legally Mandatory. Don't down play this.
Miss me with this "slippery slope" BS.
Having a standardized place to store the DOB is a good thing and it should have been there even before these laws.
And if some users want to comply with those laws, then they should have a way to do it.
If anybody actually tries to make this a hard requirement (which isn't going to happen), then you can bitch about it at that time.
This. If someone would force it, people make a fork without that bullshit
California's AB-1043 already passed, so we get to bitch about it now. Thanks for your support.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
Just like the room number when using the adduser command
Yeah just because they build cages for kids in the desert near the border doesn't mean anything's going to happen! It's just optional infrastructure in case you want to put your kids in a cage. It's totally voluntary.
load more comments
(10 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
It’s sad because at some point, when mainstream browsers will actually rely on systemd for that, website will block you.
Given enough time and ressources, that age control will hit hard like DRM.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Could someone explain to me why numerous Linux development groups are jumping on board with this bullshit? This is I think the third such post I've read that a distro or however you call it, is integrating the age check. Since when does the Linux community get on board with Big Brother????
A surprising amount of people in the open source community lean alt-right including the lead dev of systemd, some of FUTO, and others like hyprland, etc. Others like the actual dev that committed the age field code to systemd state they are apolitical but in reality are actually enabling those that want to do harm.
There's a breed of incel who benefits from power tripping in community projects. Think reddit mods.
This attack is no limited to "alt-right", it is across the political spectrum. Ex. there are plenty of lefty states implementing these laws.
Authoritarian is still authoritarianism whether it's from left or right.
(I'd also argue that software development is generally filled with leftists, I think the recent rise of prominent right-leaning developers is in reponse to many projects forgoing politically neutrality)
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(9 replies)
This is the end. Everyone switch to FreeBSD.
Been there. It sucked.
LMAO, good one!
Be aware that there are still distros out there which *doesn't * subscribe to that madness... Devuan and Artix to name just two for starters
load more comments
(38 replies)
Is the default value set to "True"?
Possibly 0 (zero) which would default to January 1, 1970.
Why would an optional field have a default value? Shouldn't it just be unset?
load more comments
(2 replies)
It seems systemd is also enshittifying flatpaks. Those damned Gnome devs man, I can't.
There are still a few old school distros, like PCLOS, that never implemented systemd because the devs didn't trust its centralization.
view more: next ›