this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
164 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

48683 readers
865 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] comfy@lemmy.ml 8 points 4 hours ago

Send an email to their webmaster if you haven't already. The more of us, the better.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 6 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

If you click the eye icon at the bottom you can go back the original captcha. For now at least.

Also I have no idea why archive.is uses reCAPTCHA from google! You've set up monaro as your only donation system so clearly you care about privacy but you haven't implemented an open source captcha?

[–] LadyMeow@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 3 hours ago

Yeah, their privacy, not yours, evidently

[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 24 points 7 hours ago

Sure, I'll prove I'm human... [closes tab]

[–] leadore@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

How does that even work?

[–] yogthos@lemmy.ml 23 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

That's what google's been using to lockout non official Android forks like GrapheneOS. You can click on the eye icon at the bottom to get the regular captcha though... for now.

[–] Squizzy@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (3 children)

How does it stop those from scanning it?

[–] LostCarcosan@lemmy.today 6 points 6 hours ago

Requires Google Play Services, from what I've heard, meaning it will only allow people who have phones pre approved by Google. I assume they also made some Apple service also acceptable. Can't cut out their friends

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 40 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, my very real human ability of scanning QR codes. Truly an inherent characteristic of humanity.

[–] Sxan@piefed.zip 0 points 5 hours ago

Þe stated reason is a lie. Þis isn't about verifying anyone is human.

But you knew þat.

[–] melfie@lemmy.zip 71 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

reCAPTCHA protects. your privacy and does not share your details with this website or app.

We foxes promise not to let any predators into the henhouse.

[–] purplemonkeymad@programming.dev 12 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

They said it wasn't shared with the website. They didn't say it wasn't shared with anyone at all.

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 9 points 7 hours ago

Reminds me of those privacy policies. "We don't sell your data!" in the big type. When you dig more into the fine print... they don't! But they do "share it within their partner family of companies". And then THOSE companies sell it. Or sometimes, sell inferences made from it, even if not sell the data.

Yeah, they're just sharing your info with their 1000+ "legitimate interest" partners. Nothing sketchy about that, no sir.

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 9 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

A some recently website someone shared showed, there are some bits of data you automatically share with websites without them asking.

[–] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Did I just have a stroke, or is this comment incomprehensible to everyone else too?

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 5 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Sorry, I was like half asleep. I can’t find it, there was a website I saw shared somewhere on Lemmy that showed you all the info you automatically shared when visiting a website and it pointed out stuff that they collected without even asking for it. The implication is that your device gives websites data involuntarily; the website wasn’t asking for it.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Funny that it just doesn't work with JS disabled.

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Disabling js disables breaks fingerprinting, but also breaks a lot of websites

[–] Griffus@lemmy.zip 1 points 8 hours ago

So funny that a site about tracking needs more tracking to work.

[–] DanWolfstone@leminal.space 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

https://sinceyouarrived.world/taken

Is the link that got posted recently, I'm unsure by who though, if someone finds the link please post it here!

[–] hopesdead@startrek.website 1 points 5 hours ago

Yes, this is the one!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 2 points 6 hours ago

better than me, they just blocked my IP outright.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 95 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (2 children)

I would assume this was trying to deliver malware if I ever saw it

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis@lemmy.today 3 points 3 hours ago

It'll certainly cause more people to get malware by normalizing people to scan QR codes on a whim without thinking

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 31 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Probably still is. Scan it and let us know if you get malware.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 15 points 13 hours ago

It's goes to recaptcha.net/qr/mMs9S9g8

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 14 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

and what if i don't have a mobile device?

[–] underisk@lemmy.ml 18 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Well, the bots do. Like 90% of viewbotting, click farming, follower buying etc is sold by people running phone farms.

[–] ironycanal@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 9 hours ago

Just scan the qr code on your screen with your mobile device, we can get it sorted out.

[–] JohnDarlen@lemmy.today 45 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Any service implementing this shit will be on my list of never using it again. Even if my bank do such shit I'll be moving to another one. Zero tolerancy. This is beyond the limits.

[–] shortwavesurfer@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

I agree, and this is strictly because Google wants to kill forks like Graphene OS. Anybody who implements this is going to get their tab immediately closed on my browser and I'm never going back. I will have zero tolerance for this.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 36 points 13 hours ago

Btw I suggest URLCheck on F-Droid, it registers as a browser and allows you to check, clean, un-shorten links and so on before opening them

[–] eager_eagle@lemmy.world 36 points 14 hours ago

crosspost it to c/actually_infuriating

[–] _lunar@lemmy.ml 16 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

archive.is has always been really problematic about having overly-aggressive google spyware captchas. half of the time i try to follow one of those links the captcha just outright rejects me because of "suspicious activity" before i can even start

very cool to see that it's somehow gotten infinitely worse

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 18 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Ugh, yeah. Cloudflare too. I hate it. It's like 2/3 of sites I try,

Blah blah needs to review the security of your connection before proceeding.

Then it goes to an enedless reload loop. Or gets stuck.

I went to a site last week that belonged to a human rights organization. It's a ranking of countries by different aspects like economic freedom or w/e, and some articles about their methodolgy. Couldn't load it due to fucking Cloudflare. Cloudflare does not deem me worthy to read about human rights.

Why? Because I try to protect my right to privacy. The irony.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 5 points 12 hours ago

chances are it was FOIA-confirmed slop anyways so cloudfare likely did you a favor. lol

[–] texture@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

captchas hate vpns

[–] Solumbran@lemmy.world 20 points 13 hours ago

Good thing that everyone has a smartphone as a secondary device. God forbid you would not be able to scan a QR code, what are we, the middle ages?!?! (and I'm not even starting on the absurdity of why you would want to do it, that's another point)

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)
[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 9 points 7 hours ago

TL;DR:

Supported Environments for reCAPTCHA Mobile Verification:

  • Android Devices:
    • Google Play Services version 25.41.30 or greater.
    • To verify Google Play Services version on an Android device, open Settings > Apps > All Apps > Google Play Services
  • iOS/iPadOS devices for QR Code Scan:
    • Version 15.0 or greater.
  • iOS/iPadOS devices for "Click to Verify" Button:
    • Version 16.4 or greater.
    • Version 15.0-16.4 with the reCAPTCHA app installed.

Fuck Google

[–] monovergent@lemmy.ml 12 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

That really stinks. Does the audio version do anything different?

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 13 points 14 hours ago

I did not try it and have closed the window after the popup because it was too ridiculous. I was able to find an article about this, looks like the rollout started a week ago https://cybernews.com/privacy/google-qr-code-recaptcha-requires-approved-phone/

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 5 points 12 hours ago

Someone wants to create an addon that hijacks recaptcha, for privacy? They only want a hash, no?

[–] overcast@lemmy.zip 6 points 13 hours ago

oh no, it’s already happening… I must be ready

load more comments
view more: next ›