this post was submitted on 18 May 2026
169 points (99.4% liked)

politics

29821 readers
2044 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/53164571

Cross post from https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAnon/comments/1tg6wbr/scoop_philly_revokes_gun_permits_for_black/

The ATF has slowly been redefining who can own a gun and the government is starting to pull the rug. They've also proposed requiring you to put your birth assigned sex on the paperwork, so if you are trans and have ids matching your gender you'll be required to lie on the form to buy your guns.

The fact that they're taking these steps prove to me that they think armed leftists and minorities are genuinely the only thing that can stop them now. I sense the US entering the cool zone

top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EmpireInDecay@lemmy.ml 15 points 22 hours ago

If you need a permit it was never a right. arm up

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 7 points 20 hours ago

The world is going crazy.... We must defend and protect ourselves because the finest people who were supposed to be doing that are basically evil goons....hmmm you guys over there, hand over your license. Yeah sorry, but ya're not allowed to ya know, defend. Alright, han'em over. Go on, gettarehere!

[–] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago

I'm not as much of a gun proponent on individual ownership grounds but this clearly seems like the well regulated militia as a bulwark against tyranny that the founders were talking about.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 57 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The one thing that gets Republicans to support gun control is black folks with guns.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 26 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

... Are Reagan and Nixon the liberals?

[–] AHemlocksLie@lemmy.zip -2 points 18 hours ago

Shit, those two are conservatives, even, from the party that LOVES their guns.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

“gun control”

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

2A is your permit. Sue the city.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Exactly city has no authority to revoke your 2A rights.

[–] mattyroses@lemmy.today 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The cops will shoot you if you don't comply. That's where the authority comes from.

[–] ruekk@fedinsfw.app 12 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Cops have better weapons. Their only disadvantage is there are less of them and they are cowards. Their 2 major disadvantages are there are less of them, they are cowards and they are all out of shape. Their 3 major disadvantages are ... I'll come back in again.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

Anyone got info on the Jan 31 incident that is the origin of this? I couldn't find anything, just an earlier shouting match between the cops and Lions.

Typically, open carry is legal in all of Pennsylvania except Philadelphia, where you need a carry license to open carry. Usually the Philly-only gun laws get overturned rather quickly, but this seems to have remained in place for 20 years with few legal challenges.

Dunno why the ATF was brought into the original comments, as this seems to be a city and/or state issue. Feds don't look to be involved here.

[–] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

To reload drop the magazine, rack the slide to clear any stuck rounds, and insert a fresh magazine.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

As a 2A supporter living in a far left state I am constantly reminded, "The people voted for these officials who made these laws."

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You only really get to vote for whoever is running. I mean you can often write in a vote, but you're not going to elect a write-in.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm gonna be real here. who the heck hears black panther type group and thinks Trump voters they deserve it.

[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We are talking about Americans, their level of stupid is unimaginable.

[–] Eldritch@piefed.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Eeeh we aren't all that unique or exceptional. Despite what the propaganda says. But our education systems are certainly lacking when it comes to teaching anything, any history involving labor or minorities.

[–] backalleycoyote@lemmy.today 1 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago)

2025 Pennsylvania Consolidated & Unconsolidated Statutes
Title 18 - CRIMES AND OFFENSES
Chapter 61 - Firearms and Other Dangerous Articles
Section 6109 - Licenses

https://law.justia.com/codes/pennsylvania/title-18/chapter-61/section-6109/

Act 66 of 2005 was the act that allows the police to revoke licenses. It was developed by the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, chaired by Sen. Stewart J. Greenleaf (R) and Rep. Dennis O’Brien (R) respectively, and the Pennsylvania State Police.

It was included in House Bill 1717, sponsored by Representative Katie True (R)

https://www.palegis.us/legislation/bills/2005/hb1717

Your people voted for these officials who made these laws.