this post was submitted on 12 May 2026
122 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29829 readers
2876 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aislopmukbang@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 week ago (3 children)

the county’s water system director, Vanessa Tigert, attributed the oversight to a procedural error during the county's transition to a cloud-based metering system. [...] QTS and the county disagreed on how long the water went unmetered, withTigert estimating about four months and QTS saying 9 to 15 months. Despite the unauthorized connections, Fayette County opted not to fine the company. "They're our largest customer, and we have to be partners," Tigert said. "It's called customer service."

What a crook

Steal 100 gallons of water, get cut off. Steal 29 million gallons, get away with it.

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 2 points 1 week ago

This is a "fuck the constituency, the data center is more lucrative" take that I expect these days from public officials.

[–] Manjushri@piefed.social 1 points 1 week ago

Someone needs to look into this person's finances. It sure seems like she has a vested interest in letting these criminals get away with this. Almost like she was being paid to do so.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

To me, the very idea that someone could steal water in such amounts is mindboogling.

Here, we have metering for each connection, and, on top of this, metering at key nodes all over the grid. Not to catch someone watering their lawn unmetered, but to watch for leaks. Water is considered important, so the utilities have strict monitoring requirements. If the measurements don't add up in a segment, the utilities immediately start to investigate, as any leak that lets water out could also let dirt in - an absolute no-go here.

They would have caught the culprits after the first few cubic meters.

[–] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

I worked in the industry they knew. The water department knew that much water was being used and by whom.

[–] Hoticeberg@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Burn. It. Down.

[–] JackDark@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

To put this in perspective, an Olympic sized swimming pool is 804,836 gallons (assuming 8ft depth). 29 million gallons is 36 Olympic sized swimming pools.