this post was submitted on 11 May 2026
90 points (100.0% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

45964 readers
275 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that. Please post actually infuriating posts to !actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating. If your post better fits !Actually_Infuriating put it there.

-The Community !actuallyinfuriating has been born so that's where you should post the big stuff.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, but attribution is not required in any way. No links to Reddit in post body


-If you would like to provide a source link, do so in the comments but not in the post body.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 14 hours ago

Insurance companies are allowed to invest premiums and are for-profit companies. Payouts are a drop in their buckets. With all the goings on in the world they should be heavily regulated. And/or what @frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip said.

[–] frostedtrailblazer@lemmy.zip 1 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Hear me out, they could just offer a non-profit insurance option through the state; this would make private companies need to be offering better benefits to consumers to stay competitive. There is no need to remove baseline benefits for people at all.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Canada has provinces with public insurance, and provinces with private "free market" insurance.

Public provinces pay >35% less.

Insurance is massively corrupt with our politicians. Even the left wing parties.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 1 points 15 hours ago

Uh...missing 90 days of work due to an injury is pretty fucking serious, and I would absolutely expect to be compensated if someone inflicted such upon me.

[–] yesman@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If insurance companies were getting hosed by injured people, why don't they look into ways that cars might cause fewer injuries instead of abandoning the injured?

Capitalism is the enemy of reason.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One easy such thing, is puttling a piece of metal over a tractor trailer's wheel area, so you get deflected if you go under and not chewn up and spit out. It's voluntary and few trucks have it on them yet but a bunch of little stuff like that could help.

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

I thought those were for airflow. They do not look strong enough to deflect anything bigger than a bicycle.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

in Europe they are law for safety.

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (2 children)

https://www.propublica.org/article/underride-crashes-nhtsa-dot-iihs-safety-cars-trucks

I just saw one of these blockers the other day, almost all trucks do not have them though. I'm not sure what you are referring to exactly.

image

image

[–] kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 10 hours ago

I wasn't thinking of the big one in the back, sorry. I was referring to the long side skirts that run down the length of the trailer.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago

Saves countless lives.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

why don’t they look into ways that cars might cause fewer injuries instead of abandoning the injured?

I'm pissed they're repaving the streets near me but they're not taking the time to make them any safer. No curb extensions or daylighting. Certainly nothing so extreme as a separate bike lane.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

My city and state both have so-called "Complete Streets" policies, yet still fail to do that. They're literally violating their own rules, but it would take a lawsuit to stop it.

[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago

(Insert anikin and padame meme here.)

"I lowered your costs Mr.Insurance parasite so you're going to lower rates now, right?"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

!actually_infuriating@lemmy.world

Nothing "mildly" about this shit!

[–] IWW4@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 days ago

Okay so you get the promise of cheaper premiums for now….

Insurance companies of all types are greedy as fuck. This is temporary. This will get increased in the next 5 years, and I’m being conservative with that number because these slimy fucks will likely be trying to increase prices the next day after this goes into effect.

Supposedly you’ll get a cheaper premium today at the cost of not being reimbursed to make you whole tomorrow. So what happens when these same companies come back and want to increase your premium by $10? Are you now going to make parties whole by the same percentage? Likely not. And the cowardly government is just going to let them step on the public again.

And how does this work for out of state drivers in New York? You get into a wreck and you’re just fucked despite supposedly paying more than a New York driver who hit you?

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 7 points 2 days ago

"Lowest insurance in the state! Only $10 a month!"

In very small print - "Deductible includes total costs for medical and vehicle"

[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 days ago

The Russian Mafia on NYC will not be pleased. Is NY still a no-fault state? They could start there.

[–] CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works -3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Democrats proving yet again why they're no better than Republicans and are completely unfit to govern.

"We're going to mandate that you buy insurance and we're also going to mandate that insurance not pay you for injuries suffered in a car crash all while portraying this as a benefit to you"

[–] bedwyr@piefed.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Which is especially true for New York State lawmakers, they've always been super corrupt. Always.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hochul is a conservative in centrist clothes

[–] mufasio@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So the same as 95+% of elected democrats.

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yep she's the prime example of one