Polygraphs aren't even admissible as evidence in court due to how inaccurate they are.
politics on db0
don't start no shit
won't be no shit
In places that isn't fascist shit hole countries, that might be relevant...
Yeah... admissible and legal are terms that don't really matter now...
They are unbelievably simple to circumvent. I doubt anyone working in high-level law enforcement doesn’t know how to produce a false positive on those things. They’re about as accurate as mood rings.
Obligatory: fucking Americans, srsly
"More than two dozen" is a very inefficient way of saying 25
Other selections:
More than a few (4) Less than a couple (1) Almost a baker's half-dozen (6)
“Beyond my expectation, thru uncontrollable factors, this scientific investigation became for practical purposes a Frankenstein’s monster, which I have spent over 40 years in combating.” - John Larson, the pig that invented the piece of woo-woo hokum pseudo-science called a "polygraph test."
When this fails to produce his desired results, what do we do next? Read tea leaves? Consult The Bones? Can they just ask Jambi the Genie?
Watch the leakers are the team doing the polygraph tests.
Take some Valium to help reduce stress changes.
Instructions unclear. Drr drr drrrrr 🤤