this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
196 points (93.8% liked)

Atheist Memes

7224 readers
395 users here now

About

A community for the most based memes from atheists, agnostics, antitheists, and skeptics.

Rules

  1. No Pro-Religious or Anti-Atheist Content.

  2. No Unrelated Content. All posts must be memes related to the topic of atheism and/or religion.

  3. No bigotry.

  4. Attack ideas not people.

  5. Spammers and trolls will be instantly banned no exceptions.

  6. No False Reporting

  7. NSFW posts must be marked as such.

Resources

International Suicide Hotlines

Recovering From Religion

Happy Whole Way

Non Religious Organizations

Freedom From Religion Foundation

Atheist Republic

Atheists for Liberty

American Atheists

Ex-theist Communities

!exchristian@lemmy.one

!exmormon@lemmy.world

!exmuslim@lemmy.world

Other Similar Communities

!religiouscringe@midwest.social

!priest_arrested@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.world

!atheism@lemmy.ml

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 133 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Imagine that you're trying to shoot a baby

No I don't think that I will.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 88 points 2 months ago (3 children)

In order to verify that this wasn't a coincidence, I would need to repeat the experiment on multiple babies.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 31 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Verification is proof and proof denies faith.

That's not how the magic sky man deal works.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Okay, that's great Jesus, but I'm still going to need to poke you in the spear hole before I buy this Third Day Resurrection bullshit.

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 11 points 2 months ago

Brand new sentence.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 8 points 2 months ago

I like the Tim Minchin line from Storm.

Science changes its position based on what's observed. Faith is the denial of observed truth so that belief can be preserved.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 59 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

No, but I'd definitely put that necklace on anyway. Not like the baby knew anything about religion, but it still worked for him; should work for me, too.

[–] 30p87@feddit.org 30 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Cast it into the fire! Destroy it!

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 26 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No. I'd just wear the cross to become invincible.

[–] Leviathan@lemmy.world 33 points 2 months ago (4 children)

What do Christians think atheists spend their time doing?

[–] multifariace@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

Asking questions. The most vile of sins.

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago

Satanic orgies, drugs, dancing and other fun stuff.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 27 points 2 months ago

you're trying to shoot an indestructible christian baby

I really want to know why I would be trying to shoot said baby in the first place. Is it the antichrist? Am I being blackmailed? Is this some sick bet?

[–] SunshineJogger@feddit.org 26 points 2 months ago

Needs a Christian to even come up with the idea to shoot at a baby....

[–] Wataba@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Funny how they keep relying on impossible hypotheticals.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Isn't that, like, the whole book?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 21 points 2 months ago

They get weirdly intricate with their baby death fantasies

[–] ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

That depends, if I shoot the baby and they die immediately, as if they took a shotgun blast to the face, would you become an atheist?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Maybe don't shoot the baby?

[–] VitoRobles@lemmy.today 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Literally impossible without having Jesus in your hearts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Tiral@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 months ago

Why would I be shooting a baby with a shot gun?

I'm an evil atheist, but Christians want to shoot babies with shot guns. Seems legit.

[–] YurkshireLad@lemmy.ca 15 points 2 months ago
[–] Cellari@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I mean... Why did the God not protect the baby anymore? Is the crucifix a required magic catalyst or something to get Gods protection? Do we have any known cases where the catalyst was not needed?

I think I'm closer to solving the riddle of Gods power...

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

Lack of object permanence. The baby stopped being a Christian when the crucifix was gone

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Siethron@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just because the amulet of protection in the shape of a crucifix doesn't mean it has anything to do with god. Wizards are mischievous.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] andyburke@fedia.io 14 points 2 months ago

Nothing scarier that someone who believes in shit they can't see that encourages them to be violent.

[–] Technus@lemmy.zip 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

What happens when the baby turns to red mist? Is that just "part of God's plan"?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aldhissla@piefed.world 13 points 1 month ago

Got a few issues with this one.

  1. Nobody goes out trying to shoot indestructible christian babies with a shotgun. They're indestructible and shells cost money.
  2. Is having the cross forcefully removed supposed to make the baby no longer christian, indestructible, or "christian indestructible" (and if so, what's that?)?
  3. Would converting therefore involve or require equipping the amulet I've looted off the now dead baby? And if so, will I lose my christian indestructibility if I take it off?

In essence, would you change your religion if it gave an attunement bonus to something you wore (and perhaps have looted off a murdered faithful)?

Tbf, it'd be worth the shitload in church tax I'd then have to pay... if it worked. Which is the trouble with these religious relics anyway, eh?

[–] Iconoclast@feddit.uk 12 points 2 months ago

I haven't build my identity around not believing in gods. Show me compelling evidence and I'll reconsider. Shotgun pellets bouncing off a baby would definitely offer food for thought.

[–] arctanthrope@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

the question is designed to trick anyone who engages with it into conceding that they would shoot a baby, and then they can turn around and say "atheists want to shoot babies"

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

wouldnt it be the anti-christ, since hes technically indestructible. jesus can be killed by normal humans.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 9 points 2 months ago (2 children)

He wasn't wearing a crucifix

spoilerAround his neck I mean

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 13 points 2 months ago

In roman Palestine, the crucifix wears you!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

I’d dislike a god even more choosing to allow such a test to proceed. It’s a variant on the “Trolley Problem”.

What kind of god would sacrifice an infant to prove belief instead of just popping in with a booming voice and saying “Yes, I’m real you morons!” to prove it?

[–] thewebroach@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Nothing about that cruel suggestion makes any sense. Why did it need to a baby, why can't it be trying to shoot the idiot making this insane suggestion who volunteers to wear a necklace and be shot.

Counter-offer: same scenario to the ignorant Christian who is shit-posting, but the necklace is of Ra, the Egyptian Sun God. Let's see if he would convert. Moron.

[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago

They have atheists and vampires confused I think

[–] Sv443@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

If shotgunning a baby is what it takes to discover immortality...

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 9 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Old testament god seemed to be pretty good and offing kids so this tracks

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Glytch@lemmy.world 9 points 2 months ago

I'd probably start believing in magic necklaces. Then I'd start down a dangerous path of experimentation to test the limits of the necklace's invulnerability enchantment.

[–] CombatWombat@feddit.online 9 points 2 months ago

Probably not. Lots of people die while wearing crosses, so it’s probably something other than the religious symbology keeping the baby safe.

[–] thefrozenorth@sh.itjust.works 9 points 2 months ago

It's christians who kill babies. Gaza, Iran, and the grandaddy of them all-the Oklahoma Federal Building.

[–] TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’d need to put the talisman on an animal, and on an inanimate object, to confirm if the power is faith-based, or intrinsic.

If it’s intrinsic, it’d test if the amulet itself is indestructible, to see if it can be sent to the center of the Earth so our planet becomes indestructible.

[–] Davel23@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago (6 children)

But the amulet wasn't at the center of the baby to make it indestuctible. More likely you'd need to put it on a chain which ran around the circumference of the Earth.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] snooggums@piefed.world 8 points 2 months ago

God didn't stop me from taking it off the baby despite knowing I was going to kill it, so no.

load more comments
view more: next ›