this post was submitted on 04 May 2026
54 points (100.0% liked)

World News

2086 readers
866 users here now

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] theuniqueone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 44 minutes ago

No more mergers of major companies.

[–] The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world 18 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I'm amazed that GameStop has this much money.

[–] Zedstrian@sopuli.xyz 10 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

Given that GameStop's acquisition offer is half-stock, half-cash, they need to round up $27.75 billion; as they only had $9 billion in cash-on-hand as of January, most of that is the $20 billion in debt they'd be taking on.

They already have $5 billion in liabilities, so when also accounting for eBay's $13.5 billion in liabilities, the combined company would have $38.5 billion in liabilities.

Not only would the combined company have negative shareholder equity after the $20 billion loan (about -$10 billion, given about $10 billion in shareholder equity between the two companies now without that debt), but their combined annual net income is only about $2.5 billion (theoretically $4.5 billion after the proposed cost-cutting; likely less however, given that shrinking the eBay marketing department will likely reduce sales), so it's unclear how they intend to pay it off, aside from issuing additional shares that would dilute the investment of the very shareholders they are trying to convince.

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

I'm guessing they're also betting on a revamp / to be more competitive with Amazon and that their diamond hand fans (I don't know how else to describe them) will switch over to ebay in droves, they would.

[–] Tango@piefed.ca 1 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Yes that's my guess as well: the prospect of stealing even a fraction of the business that Amazon does would probably make the whole thing worth it, and to that end, the main thing eBay brings to the table is the kind of pre-established brand recognition that money can't buy.

[–] darkangelazuarl@lemmy.world 1 points 4 minutes ago

They are literally buying the brand recognition with money in this proposal.

[–] jtrek@startrek.website 6 points 17 hours ago

We need less consolidation, not more. Fuck this.

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Game Stop is still around? And they have enough cash for ebay? WTF?

[–] Domino@quokk.au 1 points 14 hours ago

Wall Street Bets

[–] st3ph3n@midwest.social 5 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

"The proposal does not sound like a "terribly good offer" as it would saddle eBay with GameStop's debt, said Sucharita Kodali, a retail analyst at research firm Forrester."

Ah, there it is. Any time I've poked my head through the door of a Gamestop in the past 5 years it has been an empty ghost town mostly stocked with crappy funco pops.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 20 hours ago

Like Free-to-Play games and Casinos, they "make their real money" on whales. Go step foot in a Best-Buy; 95% of the time, the employee-to-customer-ratio is about 5-to-1, or worse.

To be clear, I think basing one's business on that concept is delusional at-best, but its what a "profitable" retail chain has looked-like to share-holders for at least the last 30 years.

[–] Krusty@quokk.au 1 points 16 hours ago

Pump it then dump it.

[–] MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

I knew eBay fucked-up, but $55 billion? That's couch-change to a lot of businesses with much worse brand-recognition. At least their turn-key operation isn't over-valued by orders of magnitude...