this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
346 points (92.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

11437 readers
2800 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

RULES:

  1. Your post must be a screen capture of a microblog-type post that includes the UI of the site it came from, preferably also including the avatar and username of the original poster. Including relevant comments made to the original post is encouraged.
  2. Your post, included comments, or your title/comment should include some kind of commentary or remark on the subject of the screen capture. Your title must include at least one word relevant to your post.
  3. You are encouraged to provide a link back to the source of your screen capture in the body of your post.
  4. Current politics and news are allowed, but discouraged. There MUST be some kind of human commentary/reaction included (either by the original poster or you). Just news articles or headlines will be deleted.
  5. Doctored posts/images and AI are allowed, but discouraged. You MUST indicate this in your post (even if you didn't originally know). If an image is found to be fabricated or edited in any way and it is not properly labeled, it will be deleted.
  6. Absolutely no NSFL content.
  7. Be nice. Don't take anything personally. Take political debates to the appropriate communities. Take personal disagreements & arguments to private messages.
  8. No advertising, brand promotion, or guerrilla marketing.

RELATED COMMUNITIES:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BaselessFabric@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 minutes ago

Can't fault their logic tbf

[–] Simulation6@sopuli.xyz 2 points 36 minutes ago

Unless they are going to talk about nuclear cooked turkeys, he could just set up a burner VM and communicate through that and a vpn. That's what I do when going to sketchy sites.

[–] 52fighters@sopuli.xyz 1 points 25 minutes ago

My poor family has to reach me on Briar.

[–] monad@anarchist.nexus 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 50 minutes ago)

Just stick to XMPP for encrypted coms. It's the original WhatsApp ( same Protocol before it was centralised and owned by world gov.)

ou can run your own server too.

You may even transfer and generate phone numbers paid with Monero on some clients.

AMA

[–] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

I live in the Netherlands so everyone uses Whatsapp. Which is worse than just SMS, even if it's less secure. Giving your data willingly to the Zuck is beyond stupid. I setup Whatsapp Business to send an autoreply that says that I'm on Signal if they want to contact me. Almost no one switches over and they just send me a SMS message. To be honest I don't care, I'm just glad that I'm not part of many family group chats anymore.

[–] sweetiesweetie@lemmy.today 13 points 3 hours ago

Signal? Lmao like i was gonna trust anything from america

Like i told my mum if you're not sending me gpg-encrypted messages on a bunch of rotating IRC dead drop, we're not talking

[–] FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world 34 points 5 hours ago

Imagine planning Thanksgiving without proper opsec 🙄🤦‍♂️

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago

dear god, the ruskies are gonna know about the thanksgiving plans.

[–] PearOfJudes@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] AlboTheGuy@feddit.nl 1 points 2 hours ago

I think that's the joke 🤣

[–] HrabiaVulpes@europe.pub 0 points 2 hours ago

dafuq, I do not know any of these apps

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 43 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (3 children)

Granny did the risk assessment and decided that ease of use and low-maintenance is more important than security when it comes to everyday family matters.

Not everyone ends in jail when they fuck up their opsec. Granny doesn't run an online cocaine business.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 4 points 5 hours ago

Granny is smart enough to get grandson to be doing the leg work and never share a signal chat with him.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Granny doesn't run an online cocaine business.

... or does she ?

[–] vithigar@lemmy.ca 15 points 10 hours ago

She actually does, but cares about opsec there, so word hasn't gotten out that it's her.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 11 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Ease of use and low maintenance just means inertia. I remember back when people wrote Tech articles saying that Windows XP was intuitive as an argument against Linux but it turns out that intuitive only ever meant it works exactly like Windows xp. Then people got smartphones and using a second type of computer interface turned out to be no big deal. And now Linux market share is growing rapidly, something we were told was never going to happen because of all sorts of reasons that apparently don't apply.

[–] cunnililgus@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 hours ago

Tbf linux has gone a long way to remove lot of the inertia. Also, with LLMs, its so much easier to use and learn Linux. Instead of chasing a problem for an hour on old forums you can get direct explanation and an answer in a minute.

[–] Captainautism@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 10 hours ago

How about everyone text and CALL Gam Gam.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 23 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

I was talking about something similar the other day, about people who "don't read sms", and I absolutely don't get it. This (Gam Gam) is the same: how the fuck do you manage to use Whatsapp, or any other messaging app, and not another? They're essentially the same! Apart from not having the old chat history, there's no difference! It's just mental laziness, IMO.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 10 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

You're speaking like someone who doesn't have elderly relatives...

The brain's ability to adapt decreases with age, to the point where it becomes very difficult to teach an elderly person anything new, and eventually even for them to remember or be shown how to do the things they've done for years but have now forgotten. It's very frustrating for everyone involved, and expecting them to adapt is expecting them to do something they simply can not do.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

There's dementia and then there's a lifetime of intellectual laziness and incuriousness. My great grandfather and his brother lived into their 90s and coped with the changing world just fine. My grandparents are getting up there and they're still sharp-witted and active and aren't afraid of new technology. Many people aren't lucky and lose their faculties through no fault of their own but complacency is like giving up on your future.

[–] Hakuso@scribe.disroot.org 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, how does this explain the Boomers and up who seem to only be capable of using Facebook?

Like, if it's about adaptation, they had email and SMS long before Meta started their "clean" version of MySpace that has gotten so much worse than what it replaced.

I'm stuck with a yearly Christmas card from a lot of older relatives because they can't manage to step back an use services they did use before the big tech algorithmic fuckery took over.

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago

They sunk their time and effort into something that offered intuitive ease of use and photos they wanted beyond occasional messages. To just sit on an iPad and tap it like a rat hitting the feeder bar in a laboratory takes very little additional effort to learn. Scroll until you dopamine centers light up, tap for more, tap all red notifications. It's easier than using email or WhatsApp or Signal because they're using it like a steam of consciousness.

If you ask Granny on FB to fine a direct message from a month ago, it's possible that's too challenging a task because it's not right there.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pineapplelover@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Would be better if Signal hadn't removed fucking SMS from their app

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 hours ago

They saw the writing on the wall. Their announcement came shortly after Google decided to close their messaging RCS framework to any third party messengers. If the Google platform is trying to kick everyone out of standardized communication, why bother trying anymore?

[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 19 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Except no because that provides a false sense of security to people who don't understand how SMS works. Either you care about privacy or you dont. If you take privacy seriously you should't use sms perioid.

[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 9 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I've seen it convincingly argued that an end-to-end encrypted chat app should not have the option for non-encrypted messaging so that you can't even accidentally compromise security.

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 1 points 3 hours ago

The entire point of signal is that its E2E without much thinking

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lojcs@piefed.social 54 points 19 hours ago (5 children)

This is an obvious joke yall

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kambusha@sh.itjust.works 155 points 23 hours ago (21 children)

The guy kinda sounds like a douche..

[–] dangrousperson@feddit.org 3 points 5 hours ago

just using the word opsec with your mom when you aren't a family of International spies is super cringe, imo

[–] Tenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone 119 points 22 hours ago (2 children)
[–] fluffykittycat@slrpnk.net 6 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

She can have somebody help install a new app on her phone if she needs help. Sorry but statistically you probably voted to create the society that made this necessary, even if they were a Democrat they still probably voted in the primaries for corporate politicians who also push surveillance. It's basic cause and effect

[–] Tenniswaffles@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 11 hours ago

I can't tell if you're missing the joke or if I'm missing it right now. I'm Australian btw, so statistically, I voted in an Australian election.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 83 points 22 hours ago (11 children)

Whenever people start talking about "opsec" and it's not people doing sensitive work I'm just like "what ops?"

[–] JustEnoughDucks@feddit.nl 1 points 1 hour ago

The op of trying to not get your entire family's conversations sold to the lowest bidder to be exploited for scams, insurance price gouging, "dynamic pricing", etc... I guess.

[–] scoobford@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

It is important for regular people to protect their privacy so that those at risk are among good company. Otherwise, anyone trying to maintain privacy is obvious and suspicious.

[–] sveltecider@lemmy.ca 1 points 6 hours ago

Browsing lemmy is my op

[–] percent@infosec.pub 4 points 12 hours ago

Operation: Thanksgiving with Gam Gam

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›