this post was submitted on 03 May 2026
268 points (95.3% liked)

Technology

84376 readers
3699 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 days ago (3 children)

I'm always confused by this as "back in my day" teachers would just take our devices away if they were chasing distractions.

Then again that was back in the 2000s before smart phones and wifi everywhere.

Young people are kinda cooked I guess. Between nic vapes and brainrot they are in for a rough time.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Really shouldn't be a ban. Just have teachers do what they always do take away the distraction and return it at end of class.

The second a fucking cell phone ban in schools hit at a legal level. Its just going to fucking evolve into regulations and bans around cell phone use for us plebians at work. Which will then be used to punish and attack people.

Bans for kids rarely stay that way.

Alot of company's have cell phone rules btw, my mom works in a factory, they can't use their devices other than during breaks. They can write you up and fire you as long as there's written rules and shit.

[–] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Same, we had texting and snake, but if the teacher saw you doing either (aside from maybe shop class) they would confiscate it til the end of class.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Young people are kinda cooked I guess.

Always have been.

[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Texan here, working for a school district where these types of laws have already been implemented: I'm pretty sure it's about controlling narratives, not improving education.

Kids use their phones to fact-check teachers, record teachers improperly addressing students, record fights, and verifiably report on very real issues within the school. I haven't seen any educational benefits from banning cell phones, only that it's been easier to sweep stories under the rug and to refute concerning complaints from children in need.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

i suspected it as much. teens have been recording inappropiate behaviour by school admistrations. any statutory rape, relationship they dont want that to hit neews. before cellphones, i caught 1-2 professors/instructers using outdated or misinformed facts in bio. this probably where its good to fact check

[–] Madzielle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] fartographer@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Oh okay, my bad. I guess I'll just change what I see and hear.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Hot take but phone ban is schools is bad. We ought to teach kids how to use the phones properly as clearly personal computers are never going away and are fundamental part of our existence.

I know it's hard, I know that teachers will struggle but it's clearly an important investment as we're never going back to a pre personal computer world. It might change shape from a phone to a watch or something but it's never going away.

[–] 5gruel@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Really a non sequitur. you could have one course "healthy use of new technology" and ban it for the rest of the school day for distraction-free learning.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 66 points 3 days ago (2 children)

It’s not about role modeling. It’s about learning and attention spans.

[–] ivan@piefed.social 11 points 3 days ago

Yeah, but explain that to the children, especially young ones.

I do teaching, and when I set rules about not using phones during class - I put mine to the pile too. You can present the most compelling argument ever, but there's a much higher chance it's gonna reach fifth graders if you actually practice what you preach, and show the example of self-discipline, otherwise it will feel dishonest or unfair to kids, because they're kids.

[–] imahappyguy@lemmy.world 15 points 3 days ago (8 children)

With that in mind, take them from the adults too lol. I know some adults who are chronically online

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago (15 children)

There's ample evidence that social media and smartphone addiction affects developing brains significantly worse than it affects fully-developed brains.

Banning cell phone use in school is a good thing.

[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Critics don't want to hear that young people whose brains aren't fully developed yet have poorer impulse control than adults...

But young people whose brains aren't fully developed yet have poorer impulse control than adults.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 56 points 3 days ago (1 children)

There's nothing new about children and adults being treated differently.

[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Their brains are literally not fully developed. Some facets of life they're literally ill-equipped to handle and policies should reflect that.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Their brains are literally not fully developed

The brain doesn't stop developing till your thirties, source. According to this argument 30 year olds should also be subjected to banning.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 42 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Sure, we give the kids alcohol, let them drive, let them vote- wait we don't!? What do you mean there's always been these kinds of differences!?

[–] Miller@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I wonder if some of those critics are by an odd coincidence funded by phone related entities.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 3 days ago (6 children)

I'm sorry, is there a massive problem of adult teachers and staff at school being constantly glued to and distracted by their phones such that it prevents them from teaching and doing what they are otherwise there to do?

No?

... Maybe the critics can ask ChatGPT what a false equivalence is.

We had early smart phones back I was in high school.

We also had this rule.

Its fine.

If its not fine, you have an addiction problem, and should seek help.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 2 days ago

I’m sorry, is there a massive problem of adult teachers and staff at school being constantly glued to and distracted by their phones such that it prevents them from teaching and doing what they are otherwise there to do?

Um.... while I wish it weren't so, it does happen quite a bit, and should be taken more seriously than it is.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] 01189998819991197253@infosec.pub 21 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Yeah! Kids shouldn't have different rules than adults! Same rules for all ages!

Sincerely,

The Pedophiles

[–] sunbeam60@feddit.uk 14 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And the tobacco industry. And the gamling industry.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

And the mining industry

[–] CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Yeah wtf? TONS of things have a set of rules for adults and kids, that’s literally what being a minor means… how is this a bad thing? Adults aren’t kids, kids aren’t adults… why should they be treated the same?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 10 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Fuck that. If you can't stop schools from getting shot up, banning phones is the wrong move.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 days ago

STOP ARGUING. DO AS I SAY.
NO, YOU CAN'T HAVE A PROTECTIVE BALLROOM!!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DupaCycki@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I could see this making sense if the American education system wasn't already broken beyond repair. Otherwise it doesn't improve education. Simply gives more control to corrupt schools.

In my country a similar cellphone ban in schools has been implemented. Except in our schools kids actually learn quite a lot. It's far from perfect, but far from terrible too. It may or may not have a noticeable impact on students' performance. That remains to be seen, since it was implemented fairly recently. Perhaps scores from this year will indicate either an increase or a decrease.

Though of course, politicians are unlikely to care and even if it ultimately leads to a decline, they won't cancel it.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (18 children)

Sounds good, we should let kids drink and smoke pot then right. You can drive a car at any age, any age person can buy cigarettes. No more age restrictions on games and movies...

Staff at schools are adults, many of which are responsible for the lives of other living humans. The critics must all have the maturity of school children.

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] akilou@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Adults are more responsible than children. Responsibility comes with privileges.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›