this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
518 points (98.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

15674 readers
287 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] protogen420@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 15 hours ago

wait till you see not only passenger trains but all trains lines in brazil, and for reference brazil is bigger than USA if you exclude Alaska and all random island USA owns

[–] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 22 hours ago

Americans be like: Chicago

[–] lemon@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Situation in Europe is far from ideal. In most cases it’s cheaper to fly than to travel by rail across multiple country borders – which I’ve always found odd, considering the journey takes much longer and each connection brings some degree of uncertainty.

18 min delays aren’t uncommon. Or your train being outright cancelled, announced only in the local language (fair enough).

The whole system is chronically underfunded, probably in part thanks to the car lobby

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I once heard of someone who had to go from somewhere in the south of England to London, and took a plane to Berlin and another to London because it was cheaper than the train.

I don't understand why plane tickets are so cheap compared to plane tickets. Part of it is that plane fuel isn't allowed to be taxed while other forms of energy are, but there's got to be more. The situation is insane.

Anyway, let's at least tax plane fuel.

[–] lemon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

That’s insane, especially considering Berlin is pretty deep into Germany. If it were Brussels or Schiphol – just a hop across the channel – I’d kind of get it.

Plane tickets have been getting more expensive. Recent (EU?) legislation places an extra tax on short-haul flights that would be 2h or less by train. The days of 30 EUR Ryanair flights seem to be a thing of the past. And the Epstein War has driven up prices for the foreseeable future.

Still cheaper to fly in most cases though.

Anyway, I’ve never been able to make up my mind about the right way forward. Make flying punishingly expensive so as to force travelers toward already expensive, but environmentally better alternatives? Or coordinate to reduce train ticket prices, e.g. through a system of subsidies? The latter is probably a lot harder to realize

[–] Kkk2237pl@szmer.info 1 points 1 day ago

Yup, I live in Warsaw, its hard to book sleeping train to Vienna. There are maybe 15-25 beds available everyday. In the meantime for the same prive or lower you can fly to Vienna. And probably more than 2000 people fly there

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

The most ridiculous situation I came across was getting the train from Biarritz in France to Bilbao in Spain and back. I heard the phrase "It's another country" uttered in both French and Spanish - turns out they really hate each other! We had to walk a few minutes from France across the border to another station in Spain.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Freight Trains in USA, for comparison.

You've got plenty of trains and train lines, but your government, unlike most of the world, refuses to subsidise public transit, so they all go for the option that's most profits-per-km, Freight

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Another one I found:

rail

Apparently this is a weak point for Europe, and even other rail systems like China's. The US has a relatively efficient cargo rail network, while more stuff is shipped across the EU in trucks than it probably should be.

[–] sweetiesweetie@lemmy.today 2 points 20 hours ago

Just box your self and call UPS and boom you're on the train

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, Electric Trucks are prevalent now, so still pretty efficient

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

Eh. I wasn’t specifically thinking of emissions, but overall cost, manpower, and road congestion.

Diesel cargo trains dramatically reduce all that vs an electric 18 wheeler, even if EV trucks are prevalent. Though I suspect they’re still pretty rare.

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, UK is the worst train service in Europe, that's nothing new.

That's cause the UK privatised 90% of rail in the 1980s

[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 1 points 18 hours ago

Try Barcelona suburban rail service (aka ‘Rodalies RENFE’).

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 102 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

"Trains wouldn't work in the US, we're too spread out"

Meanwhile, we did have a near-ubiquitous rail network a century ago and destroyed it.

Meanwhile, the US road network is the single most economically expensive undertaking in human history and has achieved complete ubiquity in almost every lived location in the country, all of it costing more per mile than your average rail line, much of it literally poured over old rail line.

Meanwhile, Europe is the size of the US and achieves equivalent rail density with far less investment.

Meanwhile, China is larger than the US, has an order of magnitude more people, an even more dispersed population, and achieved high speed rail ubiquity in less than two decades.

Anyone who tells you ubiquitous rail cannot work in the US because of our size and density is either disingenuous, misled, or ignorant.

edit - Or they're doing a bit!

[–] UnspecificGravity@piefed.social 29 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Reminds me of my home city where people argued that there was no way to incorporate urban rail into the city, but luckily the town is crisscrossed by bike trails. The bike trails were literally the rail bed from our urban train system that got torn out in the 50s.

[–] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 12 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

I love and use rails-to-trails myself, but I can't shake the feeling that they're essentially motornormative culture scapegoating cyclists to bury any possible hope of reviving rail networks. The carbrained planner says "No you can't put the rails back in, you'd displace the cyclists!" While displacing cyclists every time they choose to exclude cycling infrastructure on streets.

[–] DisasterTransport@startrek.website 4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I have similar feelings but I tell myself this: If nothing else rails to trails maintains the right of way. The carbrained city planner says you'll displace the cyclists, but in 30 years that planner will be retired or dead. What would kill railroads forever would be carving up the ROW and selling it off.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] novibe@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Europe and China are both bigger than the contiguous 48 states. The US is only “bigger” because of Alaska. Alaska is like 1/4th of Europe or something.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] olenkoVD@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Europe is not a single country. Sadly things are not the same everywhere. South-eastern european countries still lack the infrastructure required for secure transport with trains.

[–] Sisyphe@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Europe is not a single country.

Workin' on it

[–] sweetiesweetie@lemmy.today 0 points 20 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Amberskin@europe.pub 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] sweetiesweetie@lemmy.today 0 points 12 hours ago

You must love gobbling ursula's private part lmao. Do you just love corruption or what's your reasoning here?

I live in brussel. It's a cesspool of bribes and lobbies. Eurocrats are privileged fuck who sell themselves to the higher payer. I don't know what your illusions are but you should reevaluate

[–] grue@lemmy.world 51 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wanna be even more upset, fellow Americans? Take a look at what we used to have:

[–] ApathyTree@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

It was so widespread that I've never been to a small town, in the region I grew up in, that didn't have an old passenger rail station that was repurposed into something else. Your map starts well into the 1900s, my area started being built up hundreds of years before that. Shit my house is almost 100 years older, alone.

My current small town has THREE, ffs, but no, this rail can only be used for freight, because reasons

[–] grue@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Metro Atlanta's only passenger rail station that still exists, a tiny thing on Peachtree Road in Brookwood (just north of Midtown), was originally a commuter stop on the way to the big, beautiful stations downtown. They were all torn down decades ago.

I've just realized I don't even know how many traditional train stations (including ancillary commuter ones, but not including streetcars or the modern subway system) the city/metro area even had. It's gotta be dozens, at least.

[–] Krauerking@lemy.lol 4 points 2 days ago

Phoenix Arizona literally doesnt have a train station at all. You have to go 30 miles / 48km south to a suburb to catch a train and even then your destinations are heavily limited as you can only board a train from there 3 times a week.

Its a massive building downtown that just doesnt, supposedly because of failed union negotiations 3+ decades ago. Yeah we just let corporations get rid of everything for "efficiency" of cheap roads.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 19 points 2 days ago (9 children)

Here in Canada we have more former abandoned rail then active rail lines. And around where I am people are fighting to stop the old rail lines being used as biking and walking trails. YAY

[–] knexcar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I feel like many people oppose rails to trails because then there’s much less of a chance it will become rails again, so you have to let go of the hope of any sort of trains coming back. Though becoming a trail is certainly a lot better than the track land being split up and sold off to developers, since then there’s no chance.

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 4 points 1 day ago

Yeah, that is not at all the case here. There is no new passenger rail even as a dream and these rails used to be everywhere. We are talking about at least 40 years since a train was ever down these lines, and they have sat there doing nothing this whole time.

[–] gwl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Funny thing, the UK we had the opposite problem, people fighting to stop the reopening of lines that have become walking and biking trails (usually for freight train profit)

We also converted many of our local innercity lines into into ELR, which is slower but it's also cheaper and they're all loop lines with a schedule of 1 every 5-10 minutes

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

Everyone support Murkan Cowboy Capitalism, and get out there and drive big clumsy SUVs!

load more comments
view more: next ›