this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
226 points (98.7% liked)

politics

29607 readers
2102 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 hour ago

We should normalise ignoring anything after 'Trump says'.

[–] pomegranatefern@sh.itjust.works 14 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

For the record, "this fraud" is "mortgage fraud," specifically getting a mortgage while claiming more than one primary residence. It's worth clicking through if you want details, but the clickbait headline of the article annoys me. (I lay the blame for this on rawstory, not on OP for faithfully transcribing it.)

[–] Jollyllama@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

The first lender I spoke with when buying a house told me to lie on my application and tell the bank the unliveable property I cosigned on with my brother was my primary residence. She said it would be fine but it wasn't worth taking the risk so I walked. Same thing these folks did except if I had been caught I wouldn't have the $$ to pay fines.

Turns out if you make a rule but don't enforce then the folks who can take advantage of your lack of enforcement will break the law.

[–] hypeerror@sh.itjust.works 72 points 15 hours ago (3 children)

Every accusation is a confession from this guy.

[–] certified_expert@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

So he was the one eating the dogs?

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 36 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Yep. Watching his reaction to a stenographer read a sentence from that shooter's manifesto was instructive.

Remember, he IS a rapist. He was not in any way "vindicated". Just because NY has a narrower definition of rape does not change what he did.

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 27 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

HAY! That's SERIAL rapist.

Know your presidents.

Adjudicated serial rapist Inmate # P01135809 (Thursday, August 24 2020)

[–] SeeMarkFly@lemmy.ml 13 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

So very, very large.

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world -1 points 15 hours ago

Came here to basically comment this

[–] Little_mouse@lemmy.ca 8 points 12 hours ago

I keep imagining a world where if you declare something illegal (when it's not) and you are found to have done it, it amounts to the courts treating it as though it actually is illegal, but just for the accuser. I feel like it would clean up a lot of frivolous lawsuits and political bullies.

It would probably cause a lot more problems though, and likely wouldn't be applied fairly. Like all laws.

[–] Jerb322@lemmy.world 21 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

At this point, it'd be easier to count the laws he hasn't broken.

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 3 points 11 hours ago

Public intoxication is probably the only one he hasn't done because he's a tea totaler

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Do you think he has fucked a porcupine in Florida, because that is a law there.

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 11 points 13 hours ago

If he hasn't yet, I'm sure RFKJr has him covered.

[–] sns@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 14 hours ago

Personally, I think all the child raping should disqualify him from freedom.

[–] ynthrepic@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

Because of course.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 5 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

this fraud

Local Lemmy user answers to clickbait with this comment , upvote to see what happened!

[–] dalekcaan@feddit.nl 3 points 13 hours ago

Nono, he can't have committed fraud. Fraud is when the other guy wins.

[–] DarkDecay@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

Like you need any sort of probe to determine a trump committed fraud. That's literally all that family can do

[–] Sickday@kbin.earth 2 points 15 hours ago

another headline I'd expect to see on The Onion lmao