this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
72 points (88.3% liked)

Technology

84274 readers
3253 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 minute ago

More fingers. That's better or worse depending on what floats your boat.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

This is why I only watch porn made by small businesses owners.

[–] benjirenji@slrpnk.net 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

There's stiff competition. Good for the consumer.

[–] Hupf@feddit.org 4 points 4 hours ago

stiff competition

[–] errer@lemmy.world 123 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

For years, we’ve been warned that the robots are coming for us. Now they’re asking us to come for them.

Some gold quotes in this one

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Goddamned Shakespeare!

[–] BackgrndNoize@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago

Someone had a fun writing assignment lol

[–] tal@lemmy.today 11 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Rule 34, a maxim that everything imaginable has been portrayed in porn, has now been taken to its logical extremes.

Not yet, it hasn't.

[–] CameronDev@programming.dev 72 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Its not often that playboy.com is a valid source for technology news...

[–] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 66 points 23 hours ago (3 children)

I read it for the articles!

[–] newton@feddit.online 18 points 22 hours ago (3 children)
[–] Antagnostic@lemmy.world 22 points 22 hours ago

It’s not about the size of the article, it’s about the rhythm of the rhetoric!

[–] einkorn@feddit.org 14 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I like big articles and I can not lie.

[–] newton@feddit.online 5 points 22 hours ago

I understand, you can fully immerse yourself in it and everything around you suddenly becomes black 😂

[–] Deep@mander.xyz 5 points 22 hours ago (1 children)
[–] newton@feddit.online 5 points 22 hours ago

Small articles are more direct to the point .

[–] Staff@piefed.world 2 points 18 hours ago

I want to read the articles soo hard!

[–] village604@adultswim.fan 1 points 19 hours ago

The articles were actually pretty good, especially their interviews. The comics were fun too

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 32 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

I definitely think it’s worse.

There’s a lot of very unrealistic hentai body proportions trained into the models.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I found it amazing that even gooners have standards. I've noticed in general they hate AI-generated hentai and still prefer porn made by humans.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 8 points 15 hours ago

You have to consider them like art critics.

They’ve put in their ten thousand hours studying the material. They’ve found their niche and subcategory. They don’t want to see that some generic rehash of the same pose or whatever, they want something with an opinion, that makes them feel something, and where you can look at it and see the genius behind it.

So it doesn’t surprise me they’re averse to slop.

…or so I’m told anyways.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Even the AI upscales are generally worse. I prefer Bluray quality 4k porn as much as any guy, but I'd prefer to watch a pixelated 480p than 99% of upscales which look like rotoscoped animation.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Frame interpolation is pretty good. It can take a 10fps gif and interpolate to a pretty good 60fps. The color and resolution is still crap, though.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 39 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Worse. Wtf does ai know about Mac and cheese sounds? Dont get me started on the shitty anatomy

[–] neon_nova@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 20 hours ago

Judging by the amount of content online, I’m guessing it knows quite a bit.

I mean this in the sense that it probably has a giant data set to learn from.

If you are speaking about experience, then nothing.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

The AI porn cannot pass for real porn that I have seen.

[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 21 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Everyone thinks they have good gaydar because they can spot the ones they can spot.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 15 hours ago

I was thinking that just as I posted. Can anyone provide an example, like a piece of heterosexual porn because I don't want to watch the other type, that is AI that looks real? Just out of curiosity.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 14 hours ago

meh. I have yet to see ai porn that was all that good.

[–] baines@lemmy.cafe 16 points 21 hours ago

easy bet, it’s always worse, you might just not realize why yet

[–] Jayjader@jlai.lu 6 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

Vic Lagina, who was a lead producer and director for the porn production company Brazzers for 16 years and is the author of Filthy!: The Rise and (Pending) Death of Vic Lagina, welcomes it. “As a former business owner in porn, the prospect of completely eliminating humans from the equation in porn production would be extremely enticing,” he wrote in an email to Playboy, celebrating an end to “self-serving attitudes of performers, … questions about revoked consent despite whatever rigid protocols are in place, … bad hygiene, … and waiting for wood from a shaky male performer” before concluding: “It sounds like a dream.”

huh.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 16 hours ago

That more an indication of how horrible producers can be and how this mentality is exactly the same in Hollywood. Tom Cruises character in tropica thunder is a direct representation of these people.

[–] ChaoticEntropy@feddit.uk 9 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

A producer hates their performers? Say it ain't so.

[–] Damarus@feddit.org 1 points 9 hours ago

They mostly love money

[–] AstralPath@lemmy.ca 7 points 17 hours ago

More like Lic Vagina, amirite?

[–] helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

I mean...if it stops the exploitation of the "stars", that's a net positive. There's some horror stories out there.

[–] DrSoap@lemmy.world 4 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

The part where people are trademarking their likenesses and partnering with AI companies to maintain control of their image is nice. It never even occurred to me the possibility of porn stars to be part of the AI layoff steamroller, but this is essentially it. Why hire you for more when we can generate more?

I also liked that the AI partners gave them creative control over their likeness and the ability to turn down certain prompts that violate their consent. Going to grok as a workaround to still get to see someone do something they aren't comfortable with is really messed up though.

The article ending with the long term implications of AI pornography blurring the lines of consent for some people due to the nature of on demand anything goes at the click of button mentality developing is a take that is never thought I'd read in a playboy. This article was really a great read.

I'm fine with ai porn if it actually looks like real people. This weird obsession with anime bodys as if they exist in reality is, well, weird.

load more comments
view more: next ›