this post was submitted on 01 May 2026
280 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29616 readers
1479 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is that the smell of someone being cooked?

top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 15 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

usa entering their dying mall phase. cant wait to go to the spirit halloween at the lincoln memorial

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

It doesn't sound so bad. If the average person was a country, buying a house would put their debt at over 1000% of their GDP.

[–] StarryPhoenix97@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

yep. I'm curious what kind of country I'll be living in after. We all see ourselves as American (those of us who are such) but certainly we'd crack up into a few countries. It's always the disccussion of "It's going to collapse! It's going to collapes!" We should seriously be talking about what the region is going to look like AFTER the collapse and what we can do to prepare for it now.

If for no other reason than the ability to do so would be gone while the reformation happens.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 3 points 18 hours ago

I'm not going to argue this is good, but debt isn't bad either. If you're taking on debt to invest in the future, it's a good idea if the expected returns are greater than the cost + interest, which it often is for the state. That's an easy balance to make.

However, investing in missiles and shit, which are expended, is fucking stupid. You pay to build them, they cause damage (which is negative gain usually), and then they're gone. If you invest in education, healthcare, or infrastructure, it's easy to be positive. It's crazy that's so hard to get done.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Yup, definitely fulfilling the MAGAt fever dream of his running the country like his businesses, which is into the ground.

[–] TransNeko@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

I would sincerely like to know what he hasn't run into the ground... other than his current Wife since I haven't seen anything yet about her being found dead of an accidental fall yet.

[–] HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca 95 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Best we can do is a ballroom, oh and a new Middle Eastern war

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And the beginnings of our very own holocaust.

[–] AlecSadler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 2 days ago

I'd venture to guess it's far more than beginnings and we just don't know yet.

[–] JoMiran@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

Don't forget the Arc Du Trump.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 59 points 2 days ago
[–] imeansurewhynot@sh.itjust.works 63 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Also federally defunded generations of scientists so that other countries will benefit from their expertise, ensuring that other global powers will be leading the charge and reaping the rewards of new, lucrative technologies.

Lot more money and power going byebye for a lot longer than just the current ledger.

[–] kmartburrito@lemmy.world 41 points 2 days ago
[–] 14th_cylon@lemmy.zip 29 points 2 days ago

don't worry, it will be promptly fixed by firing people responsible for the statistics...

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Looking forward to the US collapsing under the weight of its own incompetence.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 22 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

I'm actually terrified of this. With all it's flaws and even evilness - I/we can't ignore the fact that it was keeping other major powers in check. China would far more likely invade Taiwan and likely whatever else they want, I'm in Baltics so.. Russia won't be so scared to attack it. Shipping lanes and global transportation of goods will no longer be protected by US (where credit is due, they really cared about it, up until Trump), other powers like Pakistan, Turkey and Venezuela might get funny ideas, etc.

Ironically, world without US would look less secure to me

[–] fiat_lux@lemmy.zip 1 points 15 hours ago

Is it possible that your security is unsustainably expensive and comes from the exploitation of human rights in other places? Why was it necessary for the people of Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Somalia, Nigeria, Libya, and others, to pay for your perceived security?

I also find it hard to believe that China has had little military engagement for the last 25 years because it's worried about the US. Up until 5 years ago it was the US's top foreign Treasury security owner.

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Ironically, world without US would look less secure to me

On the other hand, the world wouldn't have wars and coups, caused by the USA.

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Do you honestly believe there would be less wars overall without US? Actually think about this

[–] Viceversa@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

Yes. Especially within South America.

[–] AvocadoSandwich@eviltoast.org 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sooo... Currently unstable regions get a bit less unstable and stable regions get to become unstable? I guess we would be nicely averaging out then. Is this us government communist after all? Equality for all, but not the equality anyone desired! :(

/s incase it wasn't obvious

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 21 hours ago

Stable for who though? Stability has not been my lived experience in the states.

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 7 points 2 days ago

I, too, am actually terrified of this yet still looking forward to it.

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If the US goes down, they won't be able to NIMBY over South America. Those countries can rise to prominence on the world stage.

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social -1 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Yeah, because the US military is just going to vanish if the government collapses.

All those aircraft carriers, nuclear subs, and land based missiles will just leave.

[–] tacoplease@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Gotta pay and feed your soldiers and sailors and pilots to keep that military running.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 21 hours ago

Good news, we won't have to feed them with tax dollars. Bad news is the people building data centers that are part of a kill chain are now feeding the soldiers

[–] I_Jedi@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago

The US military will be too busy with power struggles to care about South America.

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They'll likely be subdivided between costal states and be scrapped. A lot of that shit is non-viable to maintain if you aren't the US, if memory serves right aircraft carriers are generally built in Maine for example kinda doubt South Carolina has the infrastructure to maintain one.

Mind you that's assuming a lot of things going a relatively specific way but I can't imagine even a reduced federal government maintaining any of the fleets.

[–] imahappyguy@lemmy.world 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

South Carolina might not have the ships, but we got the nukes lol

[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

My point was moreso that no individual state would have the resources or even infrastructure to properly maintain the various ships in the US Navy. I suspect that for any who would try (assuming new federations and unions don't pop up) would basically be stuck with the same issue as Russia with that one aircraft carrier.

[–] imahappyguy@lemmy.world 1 points 19 hours ago

I was trying to play into it in a more macabre manner. I was hoping to imply that in the event of the collapse of the US, the states would go free for all and protect resources. I have no doubt that South Carolina would try to keep as many weapons as we manufacture. It's a fun hypothetical to think about. The level of chaos that would ensue. It's fascinating, really.

[–] newton@feddit.online 8 points 2 days ago

And still have triple AAA rating 🤔

[–] decended_being@midwest.social 6 points 2 days ago

This seems like a very big deal, but I'm no financialologist

[–] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The project Squeezing America Dry (formerly Draining the Swamp) is complete.

[–] evenglow@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

The Great American Fire Sale isn't over yet.

[–] amniote@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

On federal level the deficit is actually the sum of wealth the US gov injects/ed into its economy. There is no such thing as 'my taxdollar' on fed level. The gov proposes policy, congress ok's it and FedRes pays the bills. Through creation of new money from the 12 magic computers Elon discovered during his doge tenure.

Not so on state level: states have no monopoly over a currency and have to hold up their own pants or go bankrupt. 'My taxdollar' absolutely applies on state level.

Source: MMT/Sectoral Balances

[–] Trilogy3452@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Maybe we shouldn't spend so much on the military then

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

The United States casino.

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 5 points 2 days ago
[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

Israel has the US to fund their economy. The US will need a similar sponsor to turn up or fail in the worst possible manner (if it isn't already too late).

[–] me_myself_and_I@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Land of the free! Just not free of debt though nobody is I suppose.