I kinda feel like every doctor since whittaker has been announced as a "soft reboot"
this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2026
12 points (100.0% liked)
Doctor Who Social Club
409 readers
13 users here now
A community for discussing all things Doctor Who.
Rules
1 Be constructive
All posts/comments must be thoughtful and balanced.
2 Be welcoming
It is important that everyone from newbies to longtime fans feel welcome, no matter their gender, sexual orientation, religion or race.
3 Be truthful
All posts/comments must be factually accurate and verifiable. We are not a place for gossip, rumors, or manipulative or misleading content.
4 Be nice
If a polite way cannot be found to phrase what it is you want to say, don't say anything at all. Insulting or disparaging remarks about any human being are expressly not allowed.
5 Spoilers
Utilize the spoiler system for any and all spoilers relating to the most recently-aired episode. Spoiler protection will not be granted to information that is out in the mainstream media.
6 Keep on-topic
All submissions must be directly about the DW franchise (the shows, movies, books, etc.). Off-topic discussions are welcome at c/Quarks.
7 Meta
Questions and concerns about moderator actions should be brought forward via DM.
Upcoming Episodes
| Date | Episode | Title |
|---|---|---|
| 12-07 | TWB 1x01 | "Homo Aqua" |
| 12-07 | TWB 1x02 | "Plastic Apocalypse" |
| 12-14 | TWB 1x03 | "The Deep" |
| 12-14 | TWB 1x04 | "The Witch of the Waterfall" |
| 12-21 | TWB 1x05 | "The End of the War" |
---___
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I guess we'll see fairly soon whether BBC/AMC/Sony confirm or debunk this, and I'm not going to speculate on its veracity. At face value, though, I would welcome this as a promise of the show's survival.
The draft(?) hits a lot of positive notes that give cause for optimism: a three season deal, partners with pretty deep pockets, and what amounts to a thorough spring cleaning behind the scenes and on screen.
We pretty much knew the next season would need a new cast. The Doctor regenerated, but into who and what is unsure. And the writing on the wall seems to be that Russell T Davies is leaving, too, so it's not a huge reveal that the show will be "rebooted" in that sense.
From a glass half full perspective, a soft reboot like in 2005 could probably serve the show well. Heck, an even softer one as we have seen with transitions to new showrunners would suffice. Of course, those are best case scenarios, and the leaked text doesn't detail what sort of new starting point this will be.
It remains to be seen what is meant by "a significant evolution for the series", "newly imagined narrative [...] and expanded storytelling scope". But until there is an announcement of a new showrunner and writers — again, depending on the document's authenticity — and their creative visions, I'd say that is likely just promotional bluster.
To some degree it signals that "yeah, the show was occasionally pretty meh the last couple of years, but no more of that!" All parts of the production would want to distance themselves from the less stellar performances of the previous run. As long as we're not getting some sort of reset that wipes anything from canon... such as that is.
reboot? dr who only goes foward as far as the story goes. there still so much content from 1 off arcs/villians that needs to be addressed.
I'm at a point where I don't really care what they do with Dr Who, it won't be like the Eccleston-Tennant-Smith run ever again. I realise Russel T. Davies was a big part of that, but they brought Davies back on as a writer, Whittaker was basically like a Fem-Tennant, and she's good, I liked her on Broadchurch (with Tennant, but on her own she was brilliant, regardless), but I did not like her as a Doctor. The other two were also mediocre, and/or suffered from mediocre writing.
Call me crazy, but I think they need to do something different. They've had a Black Doctor, a female Doctor... I don't think diversity in the role is the key. It's absolutely welcome, don't get me wrong. I loved seeing all the various iterations of the character. Maybe if they have different writers each episode, and bring in some international talent? What would a Quentin Tarantino Dr Who episode look like? I mean obviously it would be PG, but I think Tarantino can work with PG, he just doesn't because no one asks him to. (And would a mature Dr Who be all that bad? Torchwood was kind of awesome.) Or what about Jordan Peele? Let's get some creepy stuff back in Dr Who. "Are you my mummy?" And anything related to the Weeping Angels but especially "Blink." They've done horror before and it worked out well. Does it really have to be someone from the United Kingdom? Maybe that's holding the show back.
ncuti was the weakest doctor as far as acting goes, and terrible writing, the only highlights were the villians who were better written than he was. Her terrible run as a doctor is due to showrunner, she definitely have some things to become one but she was horribly written, whittaker complained about this before the pandemic. they tried to have spinoffs but that failed, outside of SJA whom the actor died and then the series. well dr who is a british show, naturally you would use british/.indian/Eu actors actors over an AMERICAN one whom they dont use often. the rani, missy, and various indians ones. NPH was decent as the toymaker, maybe meastro.
capaldi had a so-so series.
Capaldi was a better Doctor than his writers allowed. Man was just dripping with cool, but we only really saw it a couple times (like when he picked up a guitar). My initial sense was that he was too old for the role, but that thought was banished after a couple episodes with him. I liked Capaldi as a Doctor, but he was held back. I feel like while Whittaker was channeling Tennant, Capaldi was like an older Smith.
it won't be like the Eccleston-Tennant-Smith run ever again.
While I 100% agree, I felt the same way when the Pertwee - Baker - Davidson arc ended. (Under Terrance Dicks and company).
Colin Baker was brilliant, but the new formula wasn't going to capture the previous magic.
But then Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy were each something new and weird and special. And McGann was a wild one-shot and then decades of competent audio.
And then Eccleston-Tennant-Smith happened.
I guess my point is that if the Terrance Dicks era had never ended, I never would have gotten to experience the Davies era.
Also shoutout to Chibnall for knowing how to do a weird pallette cleansing season between more traditional stuff.
I blame the writing with the female doctor. I felt like they felt like they needed to prop her up with a boat load of companions. I think they could go back to a female doctor but make it more of the loaner who gets softened by a companion like eccleston.
I think they could go back to a female doctor but make it more of the loaner who gets softened by a companion like eccleston.
Yes! And they already have a great actress having prwviewed the role, and established as a loner version of the Doctor.
If I recall, like many great Doctor Who ideas, they're already proceeding with this over at Big Finish.
But i would love to see a live action mini series.
I think them having a female doctor for the sake of having a female lead, rather than a real story of why suddenly the doctor would manifest as the opposite sex, just made it feel forced.
It wasn't that sudden given how they just parted with Missy.
same thing with the rani too.
they couldve had jo martin apparently, which wouldve fit in somewhere.
My hotest take is that Dr Who was killed by the era that people love, Tennant era Who became too powerful, it made writing stories involving him fun, but it also made it so future writers had to level down his power (upsetting fans), break lore (upsetting fans) or write even more powerful big bads (also upsetting fans)
Just do the Valeyard already ffs
Heck yeah!
It's honestly pretty wild, that RTD introduced bi-generation and then didn't do the Valeyard
or dint incorporate sarah jane villians into the mix like the trickster.
There's still... Time.
Reboot? So we’re committing to a multiverse then?
I think the word gets thrown around so often, it doesn't really mean anything. You could pick just about any of the various new eras and call it a "reboot" without being entirely wrong.
True. Each and every destruction and revival of Gallifrey is essentially a reboot pattern in itself 😄