this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
589 points (99.0% liked)

News

37607 readers
2501 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious biased sources will be removed at the mods’ discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted separately but not to the post body. Sources may be checked for reliability using Wikipedia, MBFC, AdFontes, GroundNews, etc.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source. Clickbait titles may be removed.


Posts which titles don’t match the source may be removed. If the site changed their headline, we may ask you to update the post title. Clickbait titles use hyperbolic language and do not accurately describe the article content. When necessary, post titles may be edited, clearly marked with [brackets], but may never be used to editorialize or comment on the content.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials, videos, blogs, press releases, or celebrity gossip will be allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis. Mods may use discretion to pre-approve videos or press releases from highly credible sources that provide unique, newsworthy content not available or possible in another format.


7. No duplicate posts.


If an article has already been posted, it will be removed. Different articles reporting on the same subject are permitted. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners or news aggregators.


All posts must link to original article sources. You may include archival links in the post description. News aggregators such as Yahoo, Google, Hacker News, etc. should be avoided in favor of the original source link. Newswire services such as AP, Reuters, or AFP, are frequently republished and may be shared from other credible sources.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bigfish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 135 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

And pin it to an inflation index maybe?

[–] TheMadCodger@piefed.social 107 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Pin it to congressional compensation.

Pin it to the sum of all campaign contributions and congretional "gifts".

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 17 points 2 weeks ago

Only if that includes what they make from all sources. I could see them being bribed into reducing their pay and framing it as a selfless move for bucket-crab voters. Their new owners will make the investment back as soon as employee pay gets adjusted back down.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They pinned it to median income.

[–] Eric@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 weeks ago

Tying it to the mean would be better. When the top 10% of earners are doing 50% of the spending, the median is useless.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 96 points 2 weeks ago (17 children)

They can't pass it. They don't have majority. Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office? Because it would've been actual policy, and they don't want that. This is political virtue signaling and nothing more.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 29 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Now watch as they win midterms and this gets forgotten completely.

"We can't pass it. We don't have supermajority."

They get supermajority.

"We can't pass it. We don't have the presidency"

They win presidential elections.

"We can't just pass it. It has to be bipartisan or it's bad for the democracy"

They lose midterms.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I mean, why not introduce this bill during any of the 4 years Biden was in office?

bCoS wE dOn'T hAvE tHe mAjOrItY!!

It's the usual and convenient excuse that Dems and their neoliberal fans love to use. As if not having a majority in either houses ever stopped Republicans! If the Dems are really serious as an opposition, which they aren't, then they have to make popular choices-- the kitchen table issues. And not only that, actually impeach and imprison Trump. I think America has to go under a fully fledged dictatorship for Americans to actually know when they see one; kinda like Brazil imprisoning Bolsonaro for trying to overthrow the election, and they are not letting up at all. Because Brazil suffered from decades of dictatorship. Americans did not indict and arrest Trump because they are still arguing whether or not he's a fascist.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@thelemmy.club 37 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

How DARE they Show voters what to Expect if PROGRESSIVES win a Majority!

-People who will DISAPPEAR after the Midterms!

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 29 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It's a great move and these are bills that need to be introduced frequently by dems right now. When people say "Yeah, but what can they do". This. This is what they can do. Introducing these messaging bills for republicans to vote again and then grand standing on how republicans won't do anything to help the working class.

But dems must follow through. Minimum wage is the prefect example of where they should follow through. Attach it to a budget bill and when the parliamentarian says "not allowed" tell them to F off and push it through anyways. Just as the republicans have already done several times since they took control. Or blow up the filibuster. Either is an acceptable act for when dems get power. But they must deliver.

If dems operate like they did in Biden term 1 or Obama term 1, they'll be sunk in 2032.

[–] Tiral@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Pretty much. I'd love to see a party actually have balls. Ever when the Dems are in the majority they just circle jerk each other.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

We are fortunately seeing some of this with the gerrymandering bills. The absolute right messaging came from AOC when asked about the Virginia redistricting "We have a bill on the table to resolve this very problem but Republicans refuse to support it. If they hate this, they can feel free to vote to stop all gerrymandering".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ViceroTempus@lemmy.world 28 points 2 weeks ago (12 children)

I'm far more interested in a wage cap. Top level earner can't earn more than 10x the lowest level earner in the company. And a it doesn't matter the amount the wage is, if it isn't also tied to inflation as we'll be back fighting this fight again in short order if it isn't. That of course is take all of this at face value, and pretending it's not just theater.

Though overall I would still prefer people rejecting the current business structures and making employee-owned businesses the new way. Go Pirate with the whole thing, everybody works for shares. Unions/Min. Wage are just compromises from realizing the true potential and pay of the working class.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Democrats pretend to want to do the right thing when they're not in power.

When they're in power, we get more than enough no votes to sink it and tonedeaf celebration of the girlboss energy of Sinema's thumbs down.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] atoro@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't wait for this to not go anywhere and have several dems finger-wag for the next several years saying there's nothing they can do

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 404found@lemmy.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

This is just for show and will end up going nowhere. If you think this has even a remote chance at changing the minimum wage then I have a bridge to sell you.

We live in a time where democrats do nothing but act appalled, corporations control politics, corporations keep getting bigger, consumer prices increase year after year, healthcare premiums constantly cost more and employee benefits keep getting more expensive every year. What gives you the idea corporations are going to let politicians triple minimum wage? If that happens it will have a ripple effect where higher paying job positions will want a raise because why should someone making an entry level wage be paid the same as a job position with a lot more responsibility?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] silentjohn@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

And it's still too low for anybody to live off of.

https://livingwage.mit.edu/

[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 16 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

It would double my wages. Anything is better than nothing.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

We need a revolution to undo the damage of this administration. Democrats aren’t going to do shit and they’re all owned by the AIPAC Uniparty. This administration has been devastating to our future. Heads need to roll and I haven’t heard any democrats running on real accountability and a hard line against Israel

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 14 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Thanks I guess? Maybe try stopping the fascist movement first... we can talk about empty promises later, but I ain't seen y'all push back worth a fuck. Sure as shit, I don't believe that weak sentiment if ya can't even oust a certified pedo

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Democrats had all the leverage during the government shutdown and demanded nothing.

They had the presidency and did nothing.

But when they have no leverage they start introducing bills which they know will not pass.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When they know it won't pass, they go big. Honestly they should have gone bigger.

I hope they prove me wrong, but you won't see me holding my breath.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

They know it won't pass, but they're positioning themselves to run on "affordability". Of course, if they win, they'll "try" to pass a similar bill, but it'll get watered down to "increase minimum wage to $9.50 per hour by 2035" or similar bullshit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Return_of_Chippy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

This is one of those ask for 100 so you can negotiate down to 50 kind of things isn't it? Or just a pretend attempt to look good when it's obviously rejected.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Doorbook@lemmy.world 12 points 2 weeks ago (13 children)

Trump white house just posted " 2 kings" and these people still trying to pass fake bills?

The people of the US need to woke up before it is too late if they want their democracy back, otherwise they can accept the new kingdom.

I am not sure what he will call it, maybe just Trump

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

More theatre? I would hope not but fuck this timeline...

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›