this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2026
401 points (98.5% liked)

Technology

84274 readers
3202 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FosterMolasses@leminal.space 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lmaooooooooooo

Everytime I check the news these days, it's always just two headlines.

  • Trump Unveils Second Plan To "Steal The Moon"
  • Microsoft Now Petitioning Jus-in-rea To All Outlook Account Users' First Born Son

I increasingly feel that this is all just some simulation and reality's being autogenerated lol

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

So the ai has already won?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 24 points 3 days ago (5 children)

Windows 11 on my media PC every time I boot now asks me if I want to enable backups. So I say no. Ok whatever, corporate cunts are gonna keep trying to sell me stuff.

But then it gives me another screen ramping up the hard sell and telling me how important it is I enable sending all my data to them. There's only one button on the screen that's styled like a button, to refuse you have to click a text link. And I've already said no to them dozens of times already, including once three seconds ago.

It's like they're actively campaigning to get me to switch to Linux.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago

I, by coincidence, am also actively campaigning for Linux.

You should try it. It has a lot of issues and problems - but far less than you think, more importantly far fewer of it's problems come from enshitification (software forking helps resist that), and most importantly, since many projects are community-driven the more people use it the better it's likely to get.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Put Linux in a VM and start playing with it. Use it for browsing etc. you may find it’s not that bad.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 136 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Yeah, it's fucking ridiculous that a corporate account has a user-upsell ad/button one MUST hit to access the basic settings for the program.

[–] blargbluuk@piefed.ca 75 points 3 days ago (1 children)

One that admins can't even disable, it's bizarre.

[–] Dhs92@piefed.social 23 points 3 days ago

You can actually. You have to disable self service licensing for that specific license

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 25 points 3 days ago

That’s ~~numberwang~~ Microslop!

[–] codexarcanum@lemmy.dbzer0.com 115 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Most of my career is built on MS's stack (I fell into .NET development and got good at it. Now I'm in the same boat as COBOL, Java, and Ruby-on-Rails devs: I'm basically a software doula.)

Every job I go into now I'm reccomending they get a migration plan for self-hosting and self-owning. The American tech system is collapsing. AI is causing massive ruptures in knowledge: it obscures searches, it deskills devs, it's castrated the junior-senior-principle ladder such that we're not training enough developers to even pass along all of the knowledge of how current systems work. SaaS is reaching the enshittification threshold and all those businesses that moved everything into the cloud are about to discover that they're hostages and the sinking empire will drag down a lot of collateral damage with it.

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 29 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Not that my tiny customers have enough of an IT budget to buy their own servers with the recent price hike on memory and ssds.

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago (16 children)

Self hosting doesn't necessarily imply you need your own hardware.

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 22 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

I have also found that self-hosting, even with your own hardware, is significantly cheaper than the premium cloud hosting (AWS, etc). We priced out a VM server at my company and we found we could rebuy the hardware for it every FIVE months, just from the cloud hosting costs. And that is if we were decently disciplined about turning VMs on and off every day (which we all knew was a fantasy).

That caused us to strike out the premium providers. Leaving us with the non-premium ones (think Digital Ocean), co-locating, or in-house hosting.

[–] rollerbang@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago (4 children)

I hear you. Personally I never understood the appeal of costly hosting at AWS and such. It just always seemed so expensive. The only benefit it provided, imho, is when you legitimately need to scale very quickly or if you've got a really huge variance in load.

Everything else? My own servers please, and thank you for reading 😁

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 days ago

Yep.

Its... pretty much apocalyptic.

C Suite finally 'won'; they decided they could do the job of engineers.

They can't, of course, but their hubris will burn down the world before they admit they don't know something.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] uservoid1@lemmy.world 75 points 3 days ago

"Microsoft Teams users are extremely angry" is the standard feeling when using that product.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 78 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (4 children)

It’s fucking wild to me that anyone ever convinced anyone in enterprise to shift to cloud and SaaS offerings in the first place.

You really thought it would be cheaper forever to give all your IT to someone else? You didn’t think you were getting captured?

You thought it was a good idea to store all your data on someone else’s servers, who have control over access to your information and, in most cases, can probably read it? And that if they raised prices or did something you didn’t like such as analysis or AI training on it, you weren’t completely held hostage by this?

It didn’t set off alarm bells that all the SaaS stuff seemed less featureful and more buggy?

That every workstation was now a recurring subscription?

That you now have to pay extra to get different software to interact with each other?

You thought there would never be any downtime? You thought if there was that you would make up the cost by contractual discounts?

It’s a good goddamn thing that I didn’t know how fucking stupid adults were when I was a kid or I’d have been scared for my fucking life for so many more years.

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 3 days ago

They wanted somebody else to be ultimately liable for problems, not themselves.

They wanted less headcount, especially amongst employees that are more intelligent than they are.

They wanted to handle things via gladhandling and 'business negotiations', not actual strategy snd design.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And it doesn't help that actually running your own working mail server in 2026 is a fucking ball-ache. Especially if you don't want every big provider to mark all your mail as spam. Email has been captured by big tech.

Even people who self host a lot of stuff usually don't bother with it.

[–] null@lemmy.org 10 points 3 days ago

For me it's the security side of self-hosting anything connected to the internet. Keeping on top of all the security updates is a chore.

[–] LordCrom@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (4 children)

No one ever gets fired for buying IBM or Microsoft. I remember years ago I put together a plan for all opensourced, mature software on Linux hosts for my company. Would have saved us 6 figures in coats. They went with microsoft's crappy solution instead because it was Microsoft.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kepix@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

anyone using teams besides work deserves any kind of banner

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 days ago

Free services mean that you're the product and now you are still the product but with added charges. We are each, individually keeping MicroSlop in rude health.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 15 points 3 days ago

microslop: speedrunning their demise.

[–] silver_wings_of_morning@feddit.dk 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I reported this to our IT department a few weeks ago, asking if there was something wrong with my configuration, since surely we have an enterprise version.

Disgusting.

[–] DokPsy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

As the it department, I agree. Along with being unable to add local user accounts without using a backdoor process

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 22 points 3 days ago (4 children)

It keeps getting funnier as a spectator. Thanks Microslop for all the laughs. I use Arch btw.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] muhyb@programming.dev 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] razen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

How come Microslop is fucking up at every front?

[–] JiveTurkey@lemmy.world 27 points 3 days ago (10 children)

Only way to fix this is for people and corps to stop giving them money for anything.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] qaz@lemmy.world 20 points 3 days ago (12 children)

I think most Teams users would only pay not to use it

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] DeathsEmbrace@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Stop using American spyware. Theyre basically asking you to pay them to spy on you as well as use their products. Edward Snowden proved his point that we should blacklist the garbage software and hardware that comes from that fascist country.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Auth@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago

This has been there for years. I forgot exactly what the reason was but the banner is part of the self service feature that lets users purchase software on their own instead of billing the org. For some reason the setting to disable this was put in the teams admin center instead of the 365 one causing it to popup for users who'd previously disabled this. Its such an old issue im not sure why this is being written about now. Also majority of the people complaining arent teams customers, they're teams users and the enterprise is the customer.

[–] TheRealKuni@piefed.social 14 points 3 days ago

Weird. I’ve not yet seen this on my Teams. It would piss me off if I did, but then again Teams pisses me off all the time anyway.

[–] rossman@lemmy.zip 7 points 3 days ago

gotta ask copilot to make a perpetual crack

load more comments
view more: next ›