this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
173 points (99.4% liked)

Privacy

48525 readers
276 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://discuss.online/post/38803374

I can't. I just can't.

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 55 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

yesterday on a police chase livestream on YouTube the cops tried to shut down a car that was running from them by calling the company. They got a spike strip before they could get it worked out but even hearing that it's an option is absolutely dystopian

here's the vod btw
https://www.youtube.com/live/-d9lHib8FJM

[–] FineCoatMummy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

is absolutely dystopian

Esp because they could already use, you know... a spike strip!

It feels kinda like targeted v dragnet surviilance debate. Targeted feels OK if you get a warrant from a judge, use the legal procedures. But dragnet makes for a dystopia. Similar here. I don't want a global ability for some centralized db to flip a bit and stop any body's car across the world. Or, worst case, hacked and stops EVERYBODYs car at once.

[–] WoodScientist@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

Or, worst case, hacked and stops EVERYBODYs car at once.

I've always envisioned this scenario a little more absurd. I always imagined a hacker hacking a city full of autonomous vehicles and commanding them all to drive to a single tiny cul-de-sac. Imagine the traffic jam when a million cars all try to drive to the same tiny suburban side street all at once.

[–] Jentu@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Hasn’t GM OnStar vehicles had this tech since 2009?

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

i wouldn't know, I was 2 years old in 2019 lol

[–] JustEnoughDucks@slrpnk.net 5 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Best typo! Hello fellow 7 year old!

[–] QuinnyCoded@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 weeks ago

damn it, my habit of typing while walking strikes again!

[–] a_gee_dizzle@lemmy.ca 49 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] IAmYouButYouDontKnowYet@reddthat.com 8 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It was game over for humanity decades ago.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Obviously, people should keep having babies.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

More babies means more victims of water wars, climate Holocaust, and obedient serfs.

I personally got my tubes tied. I didn't get asked to live in a dystopia.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm so glad to hear from at least one reasonable person today. Thanks for that. Everyone lack of awareness is driving me nuts.

[–] eugenevdebs@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

It sucks being the only one in your group being aware of situations, and being ignored until shit hits the fan.

And you can't really go "I was right the entire time, and you were wrong the entire time" because it doesn't solve anything. You just gotta deal with the fact people could be doing better if they paid attention when you brought it up.

I've lost count how many times it's happened. It feels like Cassandra from greek legends, or a reverse boy who cried wolf.

[–] ScoffingLizard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago

Same here. I said Facebook was just to spy on people for the government in 2008. Everyone thought I was nuts. Now it's common knowledge. It might have started off one way, but it ended that way.

The privacy issue is what is driving me nuts now. I have done everything to convince friends to get off google, amazon, etc, suggested alternatives, talked to them about consequences, but it's like talking to brick walls. Been saying it for years.

All day I just tell people to stop doing bad shit and they just do it anyway. By the time they realize it, it's too late.

[–] Steve@communick.news 31 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

The federal government promises this surveillance saves 9,000-10,000 lives annually.

What happens when it doesn't. Is their a provision to end the program if it doesnt make certain targeted goals? No? Of course not! That would be data driven legislation.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 11 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

That's also a pathetically low number given the size of the population.

In the US alone, over 3 million people die every year. That means even by their most wildly optimistic, straight-from-the-ass estimates, it will only reduce deaths by 0.3%.

Does that sound worth it to you to give up your freedom?

[–] fuzzzerd@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

That's not how many car deaths per year, in the us it is in the 40,000 range for the last several years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_fatality_rate_in_U.S._by_year

Not sure where three million came from.

[–] GMac@feddit.org 22 points 2 weeks ago

"If the AI determines you’re impaired (blood alcohol ≥0.08% or showing fatigue), it can prevent ignition startup or limit vehicle speed"

So if I the driver is injured, or distraught over an injured passenger, the car will limit how fast they can get to a hospital?

Reckon this needs a little more time in the thinking through phase of the process.

[–] turbowafflz@lemmy.world 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the reasons i want to get a motorcycle just keep adding up. everything about cars keeps getting ruined

[–] blindbunny@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 weeks ago

Dooo it! DRZ DRZ!

[–] Comrade_cat@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Modern are having our right of repair taken away to not just spyware.

1998 Toyota Carola for the win, easy to fix, and no spyware, and just works.

[–] octobob@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago

I live in Pittsburgh. They don't call it the rust belt for no reason. If you go to a junkyard you'll see tons of perfectly working old Toyotas and Hondas as far as the engine and things go, but they're all rusted out to the point of not being worth the repairs. This part of the country sucks for owning any car. Tons of potholes, snow, ice, salt, etc. A lot of roads are just fucked in this state. Can't even avoid the potholes when your whole car's suspension rumbles down the road the whole time. Highways are a little better but not much. There's plenty of uneven roads on them too.

Sucks tryin to stick to older cars considering all this. Unless you get something out of state I guess

[–] BrickEater@lemmy.world 9 points 2 weeks ago

Even more of a reason to keep my cars from the 80s

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world 7 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Already exist in Australia and these systems are total garbage that keep warning non stop.

[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Not exactly true.

They do not monitor the face of the driver and they are only mandatory for coaches and long distance freight.

https://www.nsw.gov.au/driving-boating-and-transport/roads-safety-and-rules/heavy-vehicles/vehicle-monitors

[–] ThomasWilliams@lemmy.world -1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

No.

They monitor the face of the driver and they are mandatory for all vehicles

[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 weeks ago

Which state? It doesn't seem to be the case in NSW according to that web page.

[–] betanumerus@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 weeks ago

So the car company takes ALL the responsibility for any accident. Let's see how that works out.