this post was submitted on 24 Apr 2026
302 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

84299 readers
3311 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] EvergreenGuru@lemmy.world 86 points 1 week ago (2 children)

All they had to do was improve their facial recognition to scan all photos. Scammers would use fake photos and put their real photo (ai edited slightly) as the their last photo. This allowed them to get verified, but still scam. They don’t need more biometrics. Other apps are doing fine without your iris scans.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 week ago

Yeah but then they wouldn't get to collect people's biometric data to sell to the highest bidder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] D1re_W0lf@piefed.social 58 points 1 week ago

“Let’s partner with a bot maker to prevents bots. This is not about collecting and selling user data. No, not at all” 🙄😑

[–] Tetsuo@jlai.lu 52 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

The Match Group-owned platform is partnering with World, the identity verification project by OpenAI CEO Sam Altman, to introduce a system that uses iris scans to confirm a person is human.

🤮

[–] atrielienz@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You want some fuk? Give us you biometric data!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trackball_fetish@lemmy.wtf 7 points 1 week ago

Well that was a quick decision to delete my account

[–] Danitos@reddthat.com 5 points 1 week ago

They give you the poison to sell you the cure.

[–] FireRetardant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As soon as it mentioned eye scanning I assumed Sam Altman was involved. Didn't he have that world coin thing where he scanned a bunch of eyes in impoverished countries?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] harrys_balzac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I didn't realize there were still real people that use Tinder. I thought it was all bots by this point.

[–] hayvan@piefed.world 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It was a spam bot swarm a decade ago.

I checked again around 2023, then it was full of human backed fake profiles that pushed cryptocoin scams. It's called pig butchering.

Today I assume it's still pog butchering but backed by LLMs instead of people.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit@lemmy.world 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

pog butchering

Pogs are back? Finally, my investment will pay off!

[–] Mercury@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hadriscus@jlai.lu 28 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
[–] Bahnd@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also in Minority Report, they do the whole eye scanning thing.

[–] inari@piefed.zip 23 points 1 week ago

Sure, let's pretend they care about that issue. It's not about collecting user data to re-sell later, oh no

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 21 points 1 week ago

AI is not doing this all on it's own.

Where there are fake profiles, there are also real human scammers owning them. And they won't have no problem at all with buying enough real human data from somewhere.

So if tinder wanted to do such a thing for serious, they wouldn't choose such a stupid , short-sighted action.

[–] thedeadwalking4242@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (2 children)

What if I train a generative AI on thousands of images of iris's and start generating fake ones?

[–] Alwaysnownevernotme@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Gee I wonder where one might get a database full of iris scans?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 13 points 1 week ago

OpenAI is the one running this "verification". That's exactly what they'll be doing with the data

[–] fubarx@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago
[–] SlippiHUD@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 week ago (7 children)

Why are they so insistant of iris scans? What are they getting out of it?

[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 20 points 1 week ago

Data to sell

[–] leoj@piefed.zip 16 points 1 week ago

make the AIs better by scanning thousands of human eyes lol

[–] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because it's "futuristic" and fascists are obsessed with that image

[–] frostysauce@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No, it is because it is a unique identifier for them to collect and sell.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] you_are_dust@lemmy.world 16 points 1 week ago

Haven't used Tinder in a few years, but I guess I won't be using it in the future. I'm not scanning my eye to use what is arguably the worst dating app.

[–] sad_detective_man@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 week ago

Bro they made most of the profiles. It's profitable.

for the love of god don't fall for this

[–] IratePirate@feddit.org 15 points 1 week ago

If this truly were about keeping bots off the platform, I'd predict a great improvement in how genAI renders human eyes. Either way: supposed problem not solved, but more sensitive data collected in the process. Task failed successfully.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Oh, people didn't like the idea of giving their ID to third parties? Let's move up to irreplaceable body parts. Next step: your fucking blood. Good luck declaring that one stolen when the database inevitably leaks.

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago

That reminds me of my ex, she was willing to give her physical address and phone number to anyone who asked, but not her email address, because of security concerns.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What stops a human running Tinder bot profiles from scanning their eyeball, getting the badge, and continuing on their merry way of running the bot?

[–] BygoneNeutrino@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

If you can limit things to one bot per person, it will solve the problem. One bot per person is equivalent to traditional cat fishing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

hey, you can't make bot profiles! that's our thing!

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So what's the dating scene like for bots anyway? What do they do on a first date? Do they show eachother their prompt?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PerfectDark@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Maybe it is finally time for open-source(ish) dating to make an impact!

(It won't. I tried it a couple years back and it is a ghost town!)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Dogiedog64@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

No thanks, I'm out

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

This stuff is gonna fail hard

[–] LavaPlanet@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Oh I just watched a video on this the other day, apparently scammers (like the types who do romance scams, pretending to be a gorgeous guy, then taking all your money) are getting around this security function.

They upload all stolen pics of a gorgeous guy (probably exists for women versions too) then there's one picture of them, because they have to have one pic of themselves to get the verification tick. But that one pic is obscured, like a face on a billboard or add on a poster on a street. And then tinder verifies the whole account, regardless of the other pics. I forget, it's either bumble or hinge, I think it was bumble, deletes all the pics that don't look like you, after verification, so those were sites that block that scam.

That's an aside from ai profiles. There does need to be something to protect users from scammers. I couldn't ever speak for what the best verification option is, myself.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Not a fucking chance.

Next in AI: realistic eyes!

The writing on the wall says this will be required to access anything on the internet. I'll go a step farther and say, DNA will be required to access the internet. Only once life would be impossible to live without access. Getting closer and closer.

load more comments
view more: next ›