this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2026
27 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

11135 readers
854 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul called for eliminating the European Union's unanimous vote principle in the areas of foreign and security policy and replacing it with the majority vote principle seen in democracies.

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like a bad idea. Maybe something like 90% instead of 100%? That still prevents solo vetoes like hungary but doesnt make it so easy to completely destroy the EU from the inside.

[–] Koenig2005@feddit.org 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

As far as I understand it, an idea proposed by many is qualified majority voting where a decision can be made by 55% of member states with 65% of EU population. Didn't read the article yet so I don't know if there was something else mentioned.

Found this source for further information on how qualified majority voting works: https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/how-does-the-council-vote/qualified-majority/

[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

unanimous

This means complete agreement by all members of a vote. So if they werent actually talking about 100% then they just misused the word unanimous.

A quick search of the query "EU unanimous" gave me this. There are a lot of EU bodies that work in various ways so it can get confusing.

https://www.consilium.europa.eu/en/council-eu/how-does-the-council-vote/unanimity/

[–] phneutral@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

You are right. They want to get rid off unanimous voting. It would be replaced by qualified majority voting (QMV) which the other post refers to.

Oh i think i misunderstood the previous comment...

[–] Goldholz@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 weeks ago

Even a broken clock...

[–] HuudaHarkiten@piefed.social 3 points 2 weeks ago

Do we have any examples where one nation vetoed something and it was good?

Like the opposite of Hungary using a veto to block Ukraine aid. Like Finland using the veto to prevent Sweden from exporting surströmming or some such thing

[–] username_1@programming.dev 3 points 2 weeks ago

But to apply this approach you need an unanimous agreement :)

[–] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I can see good arguments on both sides. On one hand, the current mechanic hands every member state a veto on everything. On the other, if too many members get dragged into domestically unpopular adventures by a foreign majority, other countries will withdraw, either formally or by simply refusing to participate in Brussels.

Then again, given that one of the ~~Heritage Foundation’s~~ (ahem) “Trump Administration’s” stated goals is to dismantle the EU, perhaps Merz’s government are simply useful idiots

[–] phneutral@feddit.org 2 points 2 weeks ago

As a European federalist I can assure you that we need to get rid off the veto. The USA became the United States in the one moment they dropped the veto.

After Brexit no European nation that wants to keep their sovereignty will leave the union. I can highly recommend reading Timothy Snyders „The Road to Unfreedom“ on that topic: The EU is a group of failed empires (FR, ES, IT, PT, DE etc.) and nation states that are too small to exist without being absorbed or controlled by larger empires (especially eastern Europe) if they don’t stay together.

Thus even if the EU becomes more integrated it will the lesser evil.