A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
FYI, The Straits Times is basically a step down from a state mouthpiece. If you don't believe me, just read the article:
The cannabis seized from Omar is sufficient to feed the addiction of about 144 abusers for a week.
Here's a Human Rights Watch article from five days ago not flagrantly trying to justify the state-sanctioned murder of a man convicted of an entirely harmless crime. Fuck TST for this journalistic swill.
144 abusers for a week
By my calculations, that's about 18 ounces (144/8, assuming an eighth per person per week).
That's not that much, as far as international smuggling goes.
Still, it's a bullshit reason to execute someone over.
If you wanna smoke weed, Singapore isn't the place for you...
Yeah, I saw that and was like, holy fuck, that's fucked up. What a fucked up country.
Imagine killing a human being for possession of a harmless plant. It's wildly unjust.
Singapore is such a fucked up place, yet righties love to act like it's some utopia.
William Gibson (author of Neuromancer among other things, not all of them good) published an article about Singapore 30 years ago. It's titled Disneyland with the Death Penalty.
33 years later and much of this is still very relevant. It has dated somewhat, but accurately reflects what I experienced in Singapore during work travel over the past few years.
At the least, if you're interested in what dystopian science fiction writers think about Singapore it certainly dropped some puzzles pieces into place for me.
Two pounds of weed btw. A man's life because he wanted to get high with friends at a party or something. It's illegal to import so it's not unlikely that he wanted to get a bunch and use it over the course of a year. Fucking insane. Also fuck this articles's loaded language and framing.
Also very likely he was going to sell it.
I'm for legalising weed, but trying to import it to a country that is notorious for executing people for even small amounts is fucking moronic.
144 people for about a week, per the article.
That's like 1500 dollars of weed. Hardly worth attempting to smuggle it unless it's for personal use for a good long while.
Are you sure it's that cheap in Singapore if it's illegal there? A kilo is about 20 grand here in Estonia, has been for ages. When buying by the gram anyway, I don't know anyone who buys it by the kilo. Assume it would be a bit cheaper them. And we don't execute smugglers, it's just illegal.
I'd assume if they kill smugglers it'll be way more expensive in Singapore
"Oh that? That's my personal consumption kilo. Reason for visit? Business."
Singapore makes it extremely clear this is the punishment for smuggling any drugs.
This is what the paper disimberkment form used to look like before they switched to an electronic version. I think the electronic version says something similar.
That's really fucked up.
It probably is fucked up. But if you know the consequences of getting caught, why would you risk it? If freedom to do drugs is important either be in a jurisdiction that is lenient.
I mean you can try to change the laws and try to protest and get political change, but that wouldn't leave you much off in Singapore's authoritarian air.
So the question is, was the hit of recreational drug that important to take the risk?
I'm not saying what or what shouldn't be, I'm just saying knowing you know what IS, why would you? It's like you know lava is hot, but you step in it anyway because it should be a morally a volcanic rock.
The guy was an idiot. Doesn't change the fact that Singaporean authoritarianism is fucked up. Being an idiot shouldn't be a death sentence.
The cannabis seized from Omar is sufficient to feed the addiction of about 144 abusers for a week.
What the hell is up with this bizarre line in the article? "Addiction"? "Abusers"? Is the the article writer fucking serious with this Reefer Madness shit? What a god damn clown.
It's an Asian outlet. They never really had much sympathy for them.
Those hopeless addicts are consuming a bit over 3 grams of weed per week. Definite threat to society there.
And of course the guy being executed is not from the Chinese elite, he's a Singaporean Malay.
Singapore loves to pretend it's a modern country with it's gardens and fancy buildings.
But beneath the surface is an overworked population ruled by a family dictatorship.
It's china with a better passport. There is no freedom of press there.
No matter how you spin it thats barbaric
I'm not in any way, shape or form defending the policy of Singapore, but... given that they do have a death penalty for this, why the hell did he carry 1 kg into the country? I've been to Singapore and I was afraid to even let go of my bags for a second, for fear that someone would plant something on me.
People must sign a paper on the plane acknowledging that import drugs carries the death penalty, even before landing.
The result shouldn't be surprising for anyone.
well I'm sure he won't ever do that again!
surely he learned his lesson.