this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2026
57 points (100.0% liked)

acab

998 readers
20 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Flyberius@hexbear.net 31 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Wow. They invented slavery again

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 21 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (3 children)

meh, i think poor laws is the closest analogue, there is no right of conquest or kids being born into it. debt prisons as well, with debt being non-equity holder in modern world, apparently

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

it's more not to downplay slavery horrors tbh, surely those prisons will be sight of many beatings and so on, yet they still wouldn't approach the depravity of chattel slavery.

[–] JoeByeThen@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago

Sure, but there's clearly a trajectory here.

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

You don't have to have chattel slavery for it to be slavery, the way enslaved people were treated as livestock by Americans was historically uniquely horrific

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago

well, anglobrain associates american slavery in their brain with that word (and haiti weren't americans). roman slavery or tribe war-related slavery were different from chattel slavery, but we have same word for them. while something like peasantry in russia was skirting very close to it

[–] Busgirl@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How exactly would children not be born into it?

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

cause they would be stolen before by adoption/foster care. no, cause they aren't financial assets on the books nor funneled into the system by itself, rather by material position

[–] Busgirl@hexbear.net 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] plinky@hexbear.net 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

on larger and probabilistic outcome scale it would be kinda sorta comparable (if these laws get implemented that is), but still the comparison makes me icky shrug-outta-hecks the class reasoning is also very different

[–] Busgirl@hexbear.net 3 points 3 weeks ago

Makes sense

[–] SorosFootSoldier@hexbear.net 13 points 3 weeks ago

LITERALLY slavery with extra steps stalin-stressed

And also commit them, for what, for losing their home??

[–] FlakesBongler@hexbear.net 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Huh, I wonder why the state with some of the highest poverty rates and lowest amount of home ownership would do this thonk

[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Because it's governed by accelerationists eager to turn America's foreign policy tactics i.e. re: Cuba inward in order to foment desire for rebellion? anakin-padme-2

Right?? anakin-padme-4

[–] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 11 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Waow just like ebil sissypee Chyna soypoint-2

[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Every accusation is a confession.

[–] SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago

Every accusation is a confession.

[–] DragonBallZinn@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

“Not having enough stuff? It’s a crime! We will house you in the most expensive way possible! Why? So I can feel better seeing you suffer for not being as lucky as me!”

[–] plinky@hexbear.net 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

there are some sporadic news that housing inmates costs like 30k a year, and my question is always what the fuck do you with that money and might as well mates just give them a job digging and filling holes with those moneys (the true function is of course working the fields and inhaling smoke for 25 cents an hour, but)

[–] infuziSporg@hexbear.net 7 points 3 weeks ago

anakin-padme-2 So you have a supply of work to do that you can just assign people to!

anakin-padme-4 You're going to let them just apply to do that as a job, aren't you?