acab

977 readers
39 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
1
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/23279

This is a developing story… Please check back for updates…

Authorities in Arizona confirmed that an unidentified person is in critical condition after a Tuesday morning shooting that involved US Border Patrol—which is facing mounting scrutiny for its involvement in President Donald Trump's mass deportation operations.

At around 7:30 am local time, the Santa Rita Fire District responded to the shooting near milepost 15 of West Arivaca Road in Pima County, just miles from the Border Patrol checkpoint in Amado and the US-Mexico border.

"Patient care was transferred to a local medical helicopter for rapid transport to a regional trauma center," the fire department said in a statement. "The incident remains under active investigation by law enforcement agencies."

The Associated Press reported that "the area is a common path for drug smugglers and migrants who illegally cross the border, so agents regularly patrol there."

A Pima County Sheriff's Department (PCSD) spokesperson told the Arizona Daily Star that the shooting involved a Border Patrol agent and a "suspect."

PCSD said on social media that it is "working in coordination" with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) and US Customs and Border Protection (CBP), which oversees Border Patrol.

At the FBI's request, PCSD is leading an investigation into the agent's use of force. The department said in a statement that "such requests are standard practice when a federal agency is involved in a shooting incident within Pima County and consistent with long-standing relationships built through time to promote transparency."

"We ask the community to remain patient and understanding as this investigation moves forward," the department also said. "PCSD will thoroughly examine all aspects of the incident, however, these investigations are complex and require time."

News 4 Tucson reported that Pima County Sheriff Chris Nanos plans to hold a news conference at 4:00 pm.

A spokesperson for the FBI's Phoenix office confirmed to the Daily Star that it is investigating "an alleged assault on a federal officer."

"The subject was taken into custody," the FBI told Fox News. "This remains an ongoing investigation. No further information will be provided."

No More Deaths, a humanitarian aid group in the region, said that the incident "reflects a long history of violence from federal immigration enforcement. Since 2010, there have been 364 documented deadly encounters with Border Patrol. The number of deaths and disappearance due to Border Patrol enforcement is estimated to reach over 10,000."

"In the present moment, excessive use of force from federal agents has become especially visible. This past week, Border Patrol agents shot and killed a second legal observer in Minneapolis," the group noted. The killings of Alex Pretti and Renee Good have ramped up protests against Trump's "Operation Metro Surge" in Minnesota and demands for accountability across the country.

"As a humanitarian organization founded on the belief that all people deserve dignity, we condemn all acts of violence from Border Patrol; call for a thorough investigation; and demand that the victim receive continued access to medical attention," said No More Deaths, which also called for the abolition of Border Patrol and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE).

CBP and ICE are both part of the US Department of Homeland Security. The various shootings and other violence by DHS agents in recent months have fueled calls for the resignation or impeachment of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Trump.

Although the Trump administration has responded to the outrage in Minnesota by relocating a key official—the Atlantic reported Monday that "Gregory Bovino has been removed from his role as Border Patrol 'commander at large' and will return to his former job in El Centro, California, where he is expected to retire soon"—the president said Tuesday that Noem won't resign.

DHS violence has also complicated a congressional effort to prevent a federal government shutdown before the end of the month, given the growing number of lawmakers and people across the country demanding "no funds for ICE and Border Patrol."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

2
 
 

this has been posted before but it is very relevant today

tl,dw: cheap hardware store over-ear protection works pretty well; a plexiglass riot shield plus ear protection works great; a curved riot shield can be used inverted to direct the sound pressure back at the operator.

3
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/23001

It has been more than 55 hours since an immigration officer's fatal shooting of Alex Pretti on the streets of Minneapolis on Saturday, and still the US government has refused to provide the public with answers about the identity of the agent, or agents, who shot him.

Just as in the case of Renee Good, who was shot by an agent earlier this month, the Trump administration has circled the wagons around the narrative that Pretti, a 37-year-old intensive care unit nurse, was a "terrorist" planning to “massacre law enforcement” a claim they have provided no evidence for aside from the fact that he was carrying a handgun, which local police have said he owned legally.

Video of Pretti's killing, recorded from multiple angles, directly contradicts the claims of Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem, who alleged that Pretti was "brandishing a weapon" and that agents fired "defensive shots" after Pretti "violently resisted" arrest.

The Department of Homeland Security has not released any identifying information about the people who shot Pretti. Video evidence appears to show two agents firing at least ten shots at Pretti as he lay on the ground. One of the agents appeared to fire shots using an identical handgun to the one federal law enforcement later said Pretti was carrying.

Pretti had been shoved to the ground after attempting to film officers with a cellphone. Video shows him being shoved and later pepper-sprayed by officers, even after holding up his hands in an apparent attempt to signal that he was not a threat.

In what was described as a stunning break from the usual protocol for a law enforcement-involved shooting, Border Patrol Commander-at-Large Greg Bovino said during a press conference on Sunday that all of the agents involved are "still working," though they had been moved out of Minneapolis. Bovino himself is reportedly expected to leave Minneapolis soon, along with other top agents.

David J. Bier, the director of immigration studies at the Cato Institute, described the fact that the agents were still on duty one day after a shooting as "unreal."

"Bovino spirited the murderer out of Minnesota's jurisdiction, yet they are still 'working,'" he said. "I've never heard of that in any real police department. Never heard of that in the federal government either."

He added that "cops shot at people in seven different jurisdictions this year," and that, "in every case, the jurisdiction put the officers on admin leave as part of standard protocol."

During the same press conference, told reporters that the agents had been moved out of Minneapolis "for their safety." He then explained: "There's this thing called doxxing."

Legally speaking, the term "doxxing" refers to the public disclosure of private information like addresses, phone numbers, and other sensitive information with the intent to harm the subject.

However in an effort to justify keeping the identities of US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) and other federal officers a secret, including through the wearing of masks to hide their identities, the Trump administration and Republican members of Congress have adopted a much broader definition of the term that considers any attempt to identify an agent, even one involved in a shooting, as doxxing.

Last week, Noem harangued a CBS News anchor for even speaking the name of Jonathan Ross, the man who reporters identified as the shooter of Renee Good, live on the air, saying "we shouldn't have people continue to dox law enforcement."

She has previously pledged to prosecute those who reveal the identities of federal agents to the "fullest extent of the law," though so far no charges have been filed.

According to the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE), publishing the name of a law enforcement officer is generally considered First Amendment-protected speech under Supreme Court rulings that protect the publishing of truthful information.

S.V. Date, a White House correspondent at HuffPost, said that the federal government's refusal to identify the agent who shot Pretti essentially "means we have an unaccountable secret police force that answers only to Trump."

"This person has still not been identified," he said, referring to the agent who shot Pretti while wearing a mask to obscure his identity. "In a real police force, that piece of information is released in the very first incident report."

Members of Congress have called for a transparent investigation into the shooting, including some Republicans who are otherwise supportive of ICE.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC), who is not running for reelection in this year's cycle, called for a "thorough and impartial investigation" and said "any administration official who rushes to judgment and tries to shut down an investigation before it begins is doing an incredible disservice to the nation and to President Trump's legacy."

Of course, the Trump administration itself has already shut down an investigation into the shooting of Good, stating repeatedly that it would not pursue a probe into wrongdoing by Ross, while freezing out state-level investigators from information.

Sen. Tina Smith (D-Minn.) said that the Trump administration has ignored a court order that would allow state investigators to access evidence in Pretti's killing.

"Our state investigators had to get a warrant to have access to the evidence of the shooting of Alex Pretti," Smith said. "And even then, the federal agents refused to give them access to the evidence. So this looks very much like another cover-up."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

4
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/22855

In yet another display of the Trump administration's disregard for the US Constitution, there have been at least 2,300 cases in which federal judges have ruled that immigration officials illegally detained people without bond or due process since just July, according to one journalist.

Politico reporter Kyle Cheney shared some of the cases he's tracked in a thread on the social media platform X late Saturday. "This is one that stands out," he said of Sonik Manaserian, an Iranian woman of Armenian ethnicity who is a member of the Baha'i faith.

According to an order out of the Central District of California in Manaserian's case, US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) "arrested a chronically ill, 70-year-old woman, who came to this country to avoid religious persecution and applied for asylum, who has lived here peacefully for 26 years and complied with all check-in requirements and other conditions of release, who has no known criminal record and poses no threat to anyone, without notice or the process required by their own regulations and without any plan for removing her from this country, then kept her in detention for months without sufficient medical care—and they do not have any argument to offer to even try to justify these actions."

Cheney's thread came just hours after Customs and Border Protection (CBP) fatally shot legal observer and nurse Alex Pretti in Minneapolis, less than three weeks after ICE officer Jonathan Ross similarly killed Renee Good in Minnesota's largest city.

"Minnesota courts have been inundated with these cases since the beginning of Operation Metro Surge last month," said the journalist, noting a Friday order in which a judge freed Audberto J., a Mexican man residing in the state, "where he and his wife have lived and raised three children together over the last 20 years."

While the Trump administration has repeatedly claimed that its immigration enforcement operations are targeting "the worst of the worst," like the vast majority of immigrants actually seized by agents with the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in recent months, Audberto J. has no criminal history, according to the order.

— (@)

"Yet another ruling from Friday, freeing a man detained by ICE in Minnesota who suffered severe head injuries during his arrest and has been hospitalized since. The man claims ICE has required him to be shackled in the hospital, against the wishes of doctors," Cheney noted. "Here's another Minnesota ruling that just came in tonight: A federal judge is threatening DHS with contempt for transferring a petitioner out of the state despite a court order enjoining the administration from doing so."

The journalist added to the thread on Sunday, as judges in Minnesota continued issue to rulings. In one of those cases, "Judge [Katherine] Menendez—who issued last week's injunction against ICE's retaliatory use of pepper spray—just ordered the release of a Kenyan woman arrested while picking up seizure medication at CVS."

Sharing the thread, American Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick stressed "this is what 'mass deportations' looks like. Neither due process nor basic humanity. Don't look away."

Immigrant Defenders Law Center co-founder and CEO Lindsay Toczylowski said that "as you read this excellent thread, let it sink in that one of the most pervasive issues for people in ICE detention is lack of access to counsel which means in most cases people have no shot at filing these challenges to their illegal detentions in federal court."

— (@)

The Fifth Amendment to the US Constitution states in part that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," and protects various rights in legal proceedings. The Trump administration has also faced intense criticism recently for its disregard of rights protected by the First, Second, and Fourth amendments.

Cheney was praised by other journalists for "such good shoe-leather reporting," as "PBS NewsHour" correspondent Lisa Desjardins put it. Lawfare senior editor Roger Parloff suggested that he "should get a Pulitzer for this thread."

John Yarmuth, a former newspaper editor and Democratic congressman from Kentucky, said that "this is a great example of a journalist doing his very critical job. Now it's up to government officials to act to correct these injustices. AND be shamed and replaced if they don't."

Last Thursday, seven Democrats in the US House of Representatives voted with nearly all Republicans to pass a multibillion-dollar DHS funding bill. Pretti's killing has increased pressure on all senators to reject it. While immigration agents' deadly and illegal actions have fueled calls to "abolish ICE," some lawmakers are demanding reforms at the agency and across the department.

Pointing to Cheney's findings, anti-monopoly lawyer Basel Musharbash said: "This is fucking insane. What reforms are supposed to fix an agency that commits 2,300 adjudicated constitutional violations in just six months? And those are just the ones that made it to court!"


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

5
 
 
6
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/21744

"Even the name" chosen for the Trump administration's ramp-up of immigration enforcement in Maine was denounced as "racist and degrading" by one state politician on Wednesday as reports mounted about federal agents arresting dozens of people in the Portland and Lewiston areas.

"Nothing about this is normal or okay," said Hannah Pingree, a Democratic former state lawmaker who is running for governor of the state. Referring to US Immigration and Customs Enforcement, she added, "ICE OUT OF MAINE."

Pingree was one of several officials in Maine who condemned "Operation Catch of the Day" as the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announced it had officially surged federal agents to the state.

Assistant Homeland Security Secretary Tricia McLaughlin said in a statement that those arrested included people who had been convicted of "aggravated assault, false imprisonment, and endangering the welfare of a child," but DHS records have shown that just 5% of people booked into ICE detention in recent months have had violent criminal convictions and nearly three-quarters have had no convictions at all.

The agency did not mention that one of the people detained on Wednesday was Micheline Ntumba, a mother of four who was followed home by ICE agents after she dropped her child off at school. Ntumba has a pending asylum application and no criminal record, according to her daughter and a background check system checked by the Maine Monitor.

View this post on InstagramA post shared by Project Relief (@projectreliefme)

DHS also did not include in its statement the reported arrest of a pregnant woman in Westbrook or the fact that school attendance in Portland Public Schools—the state's most diverse school district, with more than 30% of students being English language learners—was down by 5% on Tuesday, with families evidently keeping their children home for fear of immigration enforcement.

Westbrook Mayor David Morse told WMTW, an ABC News affiliate, that a housing rights advocate had witnessed the arrest of the pregnant woman, an immigrant from Ecuador. The ICE agents later returned to the area and "yelled at her saying they knew her name and where she lived," reported WMTW.

The woman was "targeted for intimidation by a masked federal law enforcement officer," Morse said. "This is outrageous behavior from a federal authority, and I stand by our citizens’ rights to peacefully observe and/or protest."

Portland Mayor Mark Dion joined other city leaders Wednesday afternoon at a press conference where he said immigrants in the community were "anxious and fearful" over ICE's arrival.

“We believe in their right to be safe and we’ve tried to direct resources their way to support their capacity to stay here in Portland," said Dion, noting that schools are offering hybrid learning options.

City Council Member April Fournier noted that families across the Portland area are likely to face social as well as economic impacts in the coming weeks as ICE continues operations.

"Immigrants are what make Portland just such an incredible place to be," said Fournier. "And what we're all going to see is not only the social impact and what we all feel... we're also going to see an economic impact. These are now families that will have potentially the primary breadwinner in their household has been disappeared, so how are they going to make rent? So we're going to have a potential increase in evictions."

Schools and businesses may also see a growing number of staff members disappeared by ICE, said Fournier.

"If we saw that this immigration enforcement was consistent and was following the law with this administration, I don't think any of us would have the level of anxiety as I know we have today," she added.

The Maine People's Alliance (MPA) urged community members to testify in writing, virtually, or in person at an upcoming hearing by the Maine Legislature's Judiciary Committee regarding an emergency bill to ensure ICE can't enter private spaces in hospitals, schools, and childcare centers. The hearing is being held January 29.

"We want to be very clear: ICE is not welcome in Maine. Masked militia do not belong in our communities, let alone armed and willing to commit murder. Mainers won’t fall for divisive rhetoric from the Trump regime," said MPA co-director Amy Halsted. "We will protect ourselves, our family members, and our communities from the violence, chaos, and fear ICE agents bring with them. Because in Maine, we look out for one another."

"While ICE is sending masked agents in unmarked cars to disappear our neighbors, hanging around while our kids board the school bus, and kidnapping parents as they pick up their kids after school, Mainers will not be bullied," she added.

Community members have volunteered in recent days to deliver groceries to families who are housebound out of fear of ICE arrests, and the Maine Immigrant Rights Coalition has trained people to verify reports of ICE sightings to help organize efforts to protect neighbors.

The Trump administration's surge of federal agents in Maine comes after President Donald Trump claimed members of the state's Somali community, which has grown in recent years and is largely centered in Lewiston and Portland, are involved in "scams." Similar allegations preceded the ongoing deployment of immigration agents in the Minnesota, where a tiny fraction of the state's nearly 80,000 people of Somali descent were involved in a fraud scandal involving the social services system.

The mayor of Lewiston, Carl Sheline, also made clear his outrage over the Trump administration's nationwide mass deportation and detention operation, in which ICE agents have fatally shot at least nine people since September. At least 32 people died in ICE custody last year, and reports of torture and inhumane conditions in the facilities have mounted.

“These masked men with no regard for the rule of law are causing long-term damage to our state and to our country,” said Sheline. “Lewiston stands for the dignity of all people who call Maine home."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

7
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/21781

"The United States government is looking for ways around that pesky Fourth Amendment," an investigative journalist said of Wednesday reporting by the Associated Press on an internal US Immigration and Customs Enforcement memo claiming that ICE agents can forcibly enter a private residence without a judicial warrant, consent, or an emergency.

The Fourth Amendment to the US Constitution states, "The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

ICE's May 12 memo, part of a whistleblower disclosure obtained by the AP, says that "although the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has not historically relied on administrative warrants alone to arrest aliens subject to final orders of removal in their place of residence, the DHS Office of the General Counsel has recently determined that the US Constitution, the Immigration and Nationality Act, and the immigration regulations do not prohibit relying on administrative warrants for this purpose."

The January 7 disclosure was sent to the US Senate by the group Whistleblower Aid, which is "keeping the whistleblowers' identities anonymous even from oversight investigators," according to the document. It notes that despite being addressed to "All ICE Personnel," the seemingly unconstitutional memo "has not been formally distributed to all personnel."

Instead, it "has been provided to select DHS officials who are then directed to verbally brief the new policy for action. Those supervisors then show the memo to some employees, like our clients, and direct them to read the memo and return it to the supervisor," the disclosure details. "Newly hired ICE agents—many of whom do not have a law enforcement background—are now being directed to rely solely on" an administrative warrant drafted and signed by an ICE official to enter homes and make arrests.

Yeah, why could anyone think that ICE fits the description of the Gestapo?apnews.com/article/ice-...

[image or embed]
— Dan Sohege (@danielsohege.bsky.social) January 21, 2026 at 4:48 PM

Asked about the May 12 memo, signed by acting ICE Director Todd Lyons, Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin told the AP that everyone DHS serves with an administrative warrant has already had "full due process and a final order of removal," and the US Supreme Court and Congress have "recognized the propriety of administrative warrants in cases of immigration enforcement."

However, as Whistleblower Aid senior vice president and special counsel David Kligerman stressed in a Wednesday statement, "no court has ever found that ICE agents have such legal authority to enter homes without a judicial warrant."

"This administration's secretive policy advocates conduct that the Supreme Court has described as 'the chief evil against which the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed'—that is the warrantless physical entry of a home," he noted. "This is precisely what the Fourth Amendment was created to prevent."

"If ICE believes that this policy is consistent with the law, why not publicize it?" he asked. "Perhaps they've hidden it precisely because it cannot withstand legal scrutiny. Policies which impact fundamental constitutional rights, particularly one which the Supreme Court has called the greatest of equals among the Bill of Rights, should be discussed openly with the American people. It cannot be undone by hidden policy memos."

They just make up bullshit, bad-faith legal theories, do what they want until a court stops them, then lather, rinse, and repeat. In the meantime, they get to terrorize people. And nothing will happen to any of those responsible.Our courts are not equipped to deal with this.

[image or embed]
— Radley Balko (@radleybalko.bsky.social) January 21, 2026 at 5:14 PM

Other lawyers, journalists, and critics responded similarly to the AP's reporting on social media. Alejandra Caraballo of the Harvard Law Cyberlaw Clinic declared that "the Fourth Amendment literally exists to prevent this."

Bradley P. Moss, an attorney specializing in litigation related to national security, federal employment, and security clearance law, said, "Remember when the Fourth Amendment was still a thing?"

American Immigration Council senior fellow Aaron Reichlin-Melnick wrote: "It has been accepted for generations that the only thing which can authorize agents to break into your home is a warrant signed by a judge. No wonder ICE hid this memo!"

"This is the Trump administration trashing the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution in pursuit of its mass deportation agenda," he continued, highlighting a footnote that suggests "they won't even rule out authorizing home invasions with no judicial warrant for people not even ordered removed!"

"In short, this secret memo explains SO MUCH of what we've been seeing over the last months, including this raid of a home in Minneapolis where ICE officers presented no judicial warrant before breaking in the door," he said. "Turns out they were secretly told they don't need one!"

While Reichlin-Melnick shared photos of a scene in which armed immigration agents used a battering ram to enter a Minneapolis home and arrest a Liberian man, federal agents also recently broke down the door of a residence in neighboring Saint Paul, Minnesota, and arrested ChongLy "Scott" Thao, a US citizen who was later freed.

— (@)

The AP reporting and responses to the leaked memo came as the Trump administration on Wednesday surged immigration agents to Maine for what it dubbed "Operation Catch of the Day," mirroring the federal deployment to not only Minnesota—where ICE officer Jonathan Ross fatally shot Renee Good, a US citizen, in her vehicle earlier this month—but also Illinois and California.

US Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.), ranking member of the Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, opened an inquiry into reports of unconstitutional detentions of US citizens by immigration agents in October and on Wednesday demanded answers about the new whistleblower disclosure.

Blumenthal sent lists of questions and requests for records to Lyons and US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem as well as Benjamin C. Huffman, director of the Federal Law Enforcement Training Centers. The senator also wrote to Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Chair Rand Paul (R-Ky.) and Judiciary Committee Chair Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), urging them to call the ICE and DHS leaders to testify before their panels.

"Every American should be terrified by this secret ICE policy authorizing its agents to kick down your door and storm into your home," Blumenthal said in a statement. "It is a legally and morally abhorrent policy that exemplifies the kinds of dangerous, disgraceful abuses America is seeing in real time."

"In our democracy, with vanishingly rare exceptions, the government is barred from breaking into your home without a judge giving a green light," he continued. "Government agents have no right to ransack your bedroom or terrorize your kids on a whim or personal desire. I am deeply grateful to brave whistleblowers who have come forward and put the rights of their fellow Americans first."

"My Republican colleagues who claim to value personal rights against government overreach now have an opportunity and obligation to prove that rhetoric is real," the senator added. "They must hold hearings and join me in demanding the Trump administration answer for this lawless policy."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

8
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/21445

The city government of Miami Beach is under fire from civil rights groups after police visited the home of a woman about posts she made on social media critical of the mayor.

In a video posted online last week, two detectives with the Miami Beach Police Department were filmed questioning Raquel Pacheco, a former candidate for statewide office and longtime resident of the seaside resort city, over a post she made criticizing what she said was Mayor Steven Meiner’s hypocrisy around Israel and Palestine.

“This Facebook post was protected speech, and it’s not a close question — not remotely,” said Daniel Tilley, legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida. “In context, the actions and statements by government officials here are likely to have a chilling effect on those who would otherwise voice their critique of the government.”

Pacheco, a frequent critic of the Miami Beach mayor, said she didn’t think much of a Facebook comment she wrote on January 7, in which she pointed out the mayor’s hypocrisy over calling the city a safe haven for all.

“The guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians, tried to shut down a theater for showing a movie that hurt his feelings, and REFUSES to stand up for the LGBTQ community in any way (even leaves the room when they vote on related matters) wants you to know that you’re all welcome here,” she wrote, following up with three clown emojis.

Pacheco’s comment came in response to a post by Meiner in which he called out New York City for alleged antisemitism after Mayor Zohran Mamdani rescinded his predecessor’s controversial executive orders on Israel. Meiner post echoed the Israeli government’s response to Mamdani.

“Our city is consistently ranked by a broad spectrum of groups as being the most tolerant in the nation,” Meiner wrote on January 6. “By contrast, certain places like New York City are intentionally removing protections against select groups, including promoting boycotts of Israeli/Jewish businesses.”

“He claims Miami Beach is a safe haven for everyone, but the post itself is addressed to a specific group of people.”

Pacheco said she was irritated by the insinuation by Meiner that New York City was rife with antisemitism, or that Miami Beach was free of bias. So she fired back.

“I was pointing to the hypocrisy of his statement,” Pacheco told The Intercept. “He claims Miami Beach is a safe haven for everyone, but the post itself is addressed to a specific group of people and makes false allegations against NYC.”

Meiner, who is Jewish, is a staunch supporter of Israel’s war on Gaza. He has used his office to clamp down on pro-Palestine speech. In March of last year, Meiner sought to evict an independent cinema from its city-owned space over plans to air “No Other Land,” a documentary on attempts by Israeli forces to demolish a Palestinian town in the occupied West Bank. Meiner called the Oscar-winning film “hateful propaganda.”

Pacheco acknowledged that Meiner may not have verbatim called for the death of all Palestinians, but said she was taking aim at his “blind support for Israel” and the connotations of that support in light of the genocide in Gaza.

“He may not have said it in those words, but that was my interpretation,” she said.

Pacheco said she thought little of the post until days later, on January 12, when a pair of plainclothes detectives with the Miami Beach Police Department knocked on her door wishing to discuss the post.

In the video of the interaction filmed by Pacheco and provided to The Intercept, Pacheco answers the door to a pair of officers, one of whom is holding a cellphone with a screenshot of Pacheco’s Facebook post on the screen. One of the officers asks several times if Pacheco was the author of the post, but she declines to confirm.

[

Related

Man Jailed for Facebook Meme Is Freed in Tennessee](https://theintercept.com/2025/10/30/larry-bushart-tennessee-free-speech-charlie-kirk-meme/)

“What we’re just trying to prevent is someone getting agitated or agreeing with the statement,” the officer says, before reading aloud from the post in which Pacheco accused Meiner of “consistently calling for the death of all Palestinians. “

“That can probably incite someone to do something radical. That’s what we’re here to talk about,” he says. “I would think to refrain from posting things like that, because that could get something incited,” he continues.

“I appreciate your concern,” Pacheco responds, while still declining to confirm that she was the author of the post and saying she would only answer questions with a lawyer. A few seconds later, the officers depart.

Shortly after the incident at her home, and after consulting with a lawyer, Pacheco decided to post the video of the police visit online, kicking off a local controversy in Miami Beach.

[

Read our complete coverage

Chilling Dissent ----------------](https://theintercept.com/collections/chilling-dissent/)

In response to criticisms from the ACLU of Florida and other groups, Miami Beach Police Chief Wayne A. Jones took responsibility for sending the detectives to Pacheco’s home.

“Given the real, ongoing national and international concerns surrounding antisemitic attacks and recent rhetoric that has led to violence against political figures,” Jones said in a statement on January 16, “I directed two of my detectives to initiate a brief, voluntary conversation regarding certain inflammatory, potentially inciteful false remarks made by a resident to ensure there was no immediate threat to the elected official or the broader community that might emerge as a result of the post.”

Representatives for Meiner and Jones did not respond to requests for comment from The Intercept.

Pacheco, for her part, said she hopes the controversy might make city government think twice before pulling a similar move with other critics.

She said, “This stops at my door.”

The post She Criticized the Mayor’s Support for Israel on Facebook. Then the Cops Showed Up at Her Door. appeared first on The Intercept.


From The Intercept via This RSS Feed.

9
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/21149

Officials in both Texas and Minnesota are calling for accountability and a full investigation into conditions at Camp East Montana, the sprawling detention complex at Fort Bliss in El Paso, Texas, following the third reported death at the facility in less than two months.

Victor Manuel Diaz, 36, was detained by US Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers in Minneapolis, where ICE has been carrying out violent immigration arrests, cracking down on dissent, and where one officer fatally shot a legal observer earlier this month.

He was one of roughly 2,903 detainees being held at Camp East Montana at Fort Bliss US Army base, one of the largest ICE detention centers in the country, on January 14 when contract security workers found him “unconscious and unresponsive” in his cell.

He was later pronounced dead and ICE released a statement saying he had died of "presumed suicide," but officials arre still investigating his cause of death.

Diaz's death comes days after it was reported that a medical examiner in Texas was planning to classify another death reported at Camp East Montana—that of Geraldo Lunas Campos—as a homicide.

A doctor said Lunas Campos' preliminary cause of death in early January was "asphyxia due to neck and chest compression." An eyewitness said he had seen several guards in a struggle with the 55-year-old Cuban immigrant and then saw guards choking Lunas Campos.

A month prior of Lunas Campos' death, 49-year-old Guatemalan immigrant Francisco Gaspar-Andres died at a nearby hospital; he was a detainee at Camp East Montana. ICE said medical staff attributed his death to "natural liver and kidney failure.”

Minnesota Lt. Gov. Peggy Flanagan called for a "complete and transparent investigation" into what happened to Diaz after his death was announced Sunday.

"We deserve answers," said Flanagan.

US Rep. Veronica Escobar (D-Texas), who last year expressed concern about the US government's deal with a small private business, Acquisition Logistics LLC, to run Camp East Montana, said the detention center "must be shut down immediately," warning that "two deaths in one month means conditions are worsening."

— (@)

After the administration awarded a $1.2 billion contract to Acquisition Logistics to build and operate the camp, lawmakers and legal experts raised questions about the decision, considering the small company had no listed experience running detention centers, its headquarters was listed as a Virginia residential address, and the president and CEO of the company did not respond to media inquiries.

"It's far too easy for standards to slip," Escobar told PBS Newshour after touring the facility. "Private facilities far too frequently operate with a profit margin in mind as opposed to a governmental facility."

In September, ICE's own inspectors found at least 60 violations of federal standards, with employees failing to treat and monitor detainees' medical conditions and the center lacking safety procedures and methods for detainees to contact their lawyers.

Across all of ICE's detention facilities, 2025 was the deadliest year for immigrant detainees in more than two decades, with 32 people dying in the agency's centers.

After Diaz's death was reported Sunday, former National Nurses United communications adviser Charles Idelson said that "ICE detention centers are functioning like death camps."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

10
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/21151

*When Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents brought a detainee to a California hospital in 2025, they didn’t know they would leave empty-handed. Using capacity they built over months of organizing, Healthcare workers intervened quickly to protect and ultimately free their patient from the clutches of federal secret police.

Based on an interview with local healthcare worker, organizer, and Black Rose/Rosa Negra member Morgan****,*** this article breaks down how hospital staff launched campaigns and won victories that pushed ICE out of their workplace. Although steps are listed numerically, in reality they feed off and into one another at any given time.

by Juan Verala Luz

  1. Build the Culture

A big hurdle to pushing law enforcement out of healthcare settings is the normalized culture of collaboration. “We have all different kinds of cops in the hospital all the time,” Morgan explained. Like many similar settings, management forces staff to cooperate with police mandates often “beyond what is necessary in the law.” For example, workplace policies prevent workers from helping patients in custody to contact their families. Those kinds of requirements are often taken-for-granted.

Trump’s barbarous attacks on immigrant communities created openings to challenge that. In a “sanctuary city” that serves many immigrants, management quickly put out basic know-your-rights information about warrantless entries and other gross violations of the law. Without clear procedures for responding to real-world scenarios, staff across the health center felt this inadequate response left them unprepared and confused about what to do if ICE came to the hospital.

A core of organizers seized the opportunity to reshape the culture. They passed out informational flyers about interacting with ICE and partnered with local legal clinics to host healthcare-specific “Know Your Rights” training. They also adapted for their workplace “What to Do if ICE Comes” badge buddies–a small card outlining common procedures, codes, and other need-to-know parts of the job that people could wear everyday under their hospital IDs.1

Questioning ICE’s presence with everyday parts of the job not only increased awareness about workplace rights, but it also permitted coworkers to imagine a different way of interacting with them. It showed one another that they could have the workplace they want–one that protects themselves and their patients.

  1. Grow Networks and Strengthen Relationships

The core of organizers didn’t materialize out of thin air. The group, which drew in “a mix of people with different jobs like medical residents, nurses, dieticians, physical therapists,” and more, met in no small measure thanks to years of organizing against the genocide of the Palestinian people. A local Healthcare Workers for Palestine chapter deepened their connections with each other, other healthcare workers in the region, and allies outside their industry.

Following Trump’s reelection, they began planning how they could keep ICE out of their workplace. This small group couldn’t stop ICE on their own, but they knew that their committee’s diverse membership could activate coworkers across their institution.

To do that, they began adding all their coworkers to a WhatsApp chat. Here, they invited one another to upcoming “Know Your Rights” training and planned to alert each other if ICE is in the building. This chat is generally open for any coworker to join with a focus on spreading the word instead of tight security. There is one exception: they keep out management because, however well-meaning individuals are, “they have different pressures on them than we do, and some of those pressures come from above that are going to be reactionary forces.”

Relationships didn’t stop at the hospital doors though. Healthcare workers developed ties with a neighborhood rapid-response network. They also learned from colleagues at nearby facilities frequented by ICE about how they created a powerful policy to protect patients in ICE custody. And connections with lawyers who trained staff about their rights would later provide pro bono legal support for a patient’s release from ICE.

  1. Set Goals and Make Demands

Growing arrests at courthouses and brutal conditions in ICE detention centers put more detainees in medical emergencies. In 2025, the deadliest year to date, 32 people died in ICE custody. Although Morgan’s coworkers hadn’t treated patients in ICE custody during this uptick, they didn’t want to panic when they inevitably arrived at the hospital’s doorsteps. With a wider reach and a growing culture of resisting ICE, coworkers began setting goals, formulating demands for management, and committing themselves to defending one another and their patients.

“Our real demand is that we should not even allow ICE in our hospital at all,” Morgan emphasized. But because that was “going to be a harder one to win,” hospital workers began formulating interim demands. In the medium term, healthcare organizers drafted a workplace policy that would restrict the agency’s reach within their hospital. Modeled after another California hospital’s policy shared with them through organizing networks, their version demanded protections to help detained patients exercise basic, constitutional rights, like access to legal counsel, and allow them to contact families about medical concerns.

Even if management wouldn’t accept the policy wholecloth, healthcare workers promised one another they would act as if it was in place. They readied a petition that would urge management to provide the protections they wanted for their patients.

Demands gave shape to the growing anti-ICE sentiments among hospital workers, showing one another that they weren’t alone and, together, they could envision the workplace they wanted.

  1. Act Courageously, Ethically, and Innovatively to Win

The first time ICE brought in a sick patient, on-duty personnel pinged the WhatsApp chat about agents’ presence. Attending staff and coworkers “immediately started putting pressure on management,” gathering hundreds of signatures in a few short hours on the prepared petition. Despite the healthcare workers’ best efforts, administrators failed to act and the patient was eventually discharged back to ICE.

Bolstered by their powerful but ultimately unsuccessful efforts, organizers pushed even harder for a clear, strong anti-ICE policy. To turn up the pressure, they scheduled a public forum about the dangers of ICE in the hospital where they invited management to answer for the facility’s inadequate protections. This proved a turning point in their struggle.

Shortly before the forum began, management quietly posted to the hospital’s intranet the demanded “ICE interactions” policy. Emboldened, healthcare workers and community organizers grilled management about further strengthening the protections. They had no better proof-positive of their needs than when ICE hauled in another patient that same day.

Upon the patient’s arrival, hospital staff moved quickly. They sought support from lawyers they got to know from the healthcare worker legal trainings who, with little hesitation, agreed to take on the patient’s case. Meanwhile, attending physicians provided maximum care to the patient, ordering numerous tests that slowed their discharge. Those delays allowed lawyers to petition the court that the patient was unlawfully detained – an injunction the judge upheld. Beaming with pride, Morgan concluded “the ICE officer who had been accompanying them had to walk out of the hospital and leave and this person was able to be discharged back to their home.”

On their own, demands weren’t enough to change hospital policy and secure their patient’s freedom. Collective action grounded in cunning, courage, and a commitment to control over their workplace–and, in a small measure, society writ large–carried hospital workers to victory.

  1. Keep Fighting

Morgan—and an increasing share of coworkers—won’t isolate ICE from other police agencies. “I think the goal should be to make our policies for anyone incarcerated to have these protections.” Federal agents and municipal police alike, they proclaim, should be kept out of their hospital. Hospital workers have issued another deadline for management to update all their policies on interactions with law enforcement, and are ready to act if they don’t respond.
To be certain, these gains build on nearly a decade of organizing. Without rank-and-file union reformers challenging stodgy leadership with a successful strike that secured a stronger contract years ago, many of today’s organizers would not have gotten to know one another. Without prior workplace organizing and struggle against genocide in Gaza, many healthcare workers would not have come to know they can reshape the culture and policies at their institutions.

Even though you and coworkers may not have been building for years, it doesn’t mean that you can’t still win nor that you shouldn’t start fighting today. ICE is not slowing its fascistic spread–and neither should our defense of each other, patients. As Morgan reminds us:

You’re not always going to win things. When you don’t, you’re making relationships and learning skills that you can use next time to win things. It feels impossible right now, but you definitely will not win anything unless you fight.

Notes

  1. Although not used in this campaign, we have collected some examples of the kinds of flyers, know-your-rights information, training, and badge buddies described above. ↩︎

If you enjoyed this piece, we also recommend Organizing to Keep ICE Out of Your Workplace and How Everyday Organizing Stopped Trump’s Bay Area ICE Surge.

The post Healthcare Workers Freed a Patient From ICE – You Can Do the Same appeared first on Black Rose/Rosa Negra Anarchist Federation.


From Black Rose/Rosa Negra Anarchist Federation via This RSS Feed.

11
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/20442

A Texas medical examiner is reportedly planning to classify the recent death of Geraldo Lunas Campos, who was detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement last summer, as a homicide, marking the latest apparent abuse at the hands of an agency that has been rampaging lawlessly through US communities at the behest of President Donald Trump.

As the Washington Post reported Friday, "An employee of El Paso County’s Office of the Medical Examiner told Lunas Campos’ daughter this week that, subject to results of a toxicology report, the office is likely to classify the death as a homicide, according to a recording of the conversation."

"The employee said a doctor there 'is listing the preliminary cause of death as asphyxia due to neck and chest compression,' which means Lunas Campos did not get enough oxygen because of pressure on his neck and chest," the newspaper added.

In an interview with the Post, one detainee at the sprawling El Paso detention center known as Camp East Montana said he witnessed "at least five guards struggling with Lunas Campos after he refused to enter the segregation unit, complaining that he didn’t have his medications."

The eyewitness, according to the Post, "said he saw guards choking Lunas Campos and heard Lunas Campos repeatedly saying, 'No puedo respirar'—Spanish for 'I can't breathe.' Medical staff tried to resuscitate him for an hour, after which they took his body away."

Jeanette Pagan Lopez, the mother of two of Lunas Campos' children, told the Post that she was contacted by agents from the FBI who said they were investigating Lunas Campos' death.

“I know it’s a homicide,” Lopez told the newspaper. “The people that physically harmed him should be held accountable.”

US Rep. Nanette Barragán (D-Calif.), co-chair of the Congressional Hispanic Caucus, wrote in response to the Post's reporting that "Geraldo Lunas Campos may have been murdered."

"So disturbing," Barragán added. "Republicans’ excessive funding of ICE and DHS, along with Trump’s pardons and claims of absolute immunity, are literally killing people. Republicans remain silent or are openly OK with this."

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security, which has lied relentlessly about recent killings and other incidents involving ICE, claimed in a statement that Lunas Campos died after trying to take his own life.

“Campos violently resisted the security staff and continued to attempt to take his life,” said DHS Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin. “During the ensuing struggle, Campos stopped breathing and lost consciousness. Medical staff was immediately called and responded. After repeated attempts to resuscitate him, EMTs declared him deceased on the scene.”

Lunas Campos, a 55-year-old Cuban immigrant, was detained last summer and died on January 3. Citing court records, the Post noted that "Lunas Campos was convicted of several crimes, including for aggravated assault with a weapon and, in 2003, first-degree sexual abuse involving a child under 11 years old."

"Be ready for the Trump admin to highlight this guy's lengthy criminal record to eliminate any sympathy for him, even though none of that justifies being choked to death by guards at a detention center," said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council.

Lunas Campos is one of four people to die in ICE custody so far in 2026.

“ICE kills—full stop," said Setareh Ghandehari, advocacy director at Detention Watch Network. "Whether ICE is targeting people in the streets, where they work or live or behind closed doors in one of its nearly 200 abuse-ridden detention centers across the country—ICE is an inherently violent agency jeopardizing families and community safety."

Camp East Montana, where Lunas Campos was reportedly killed, is a huge makeshift tent camp at the Fort Bliss military base in El Paso, Texas.

Last month, the ACLU and other human rights groups demanded the immediate closure of the facility for immigrant detention, citing "accounts of horrific conditions, including beatings and sexual abuse by officers against detained immigrants, beatings and coercive threats to compel deportation to third countries, medical neglect, hunger and insufficient food, and denial of meaningful access to counsel, among other rights violations."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

12
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/20472

What happens when you do minimal screening before hiring agents, arming them, and sending them into the streets? We’re all finding out.


The plan was never to become an ICE agent.

The plan, when I went to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement Career Expo in Texas last August, was to learn what it was like to apply to be an ICE agent. Who wouldn't be curious? The event promised on-the-spot hiring for would-be deportation officers: Walk in unemployed, walk out with a sweet $50k signing bonus, a retirement account, and a license to brutalize the country's most vulnerable residents without consequence---all while wrapped in the warm glow of patriotism.

At first glance, my résumé has enough to tantalize a recruiter for America's Gestapo-in-waiting: I enlisted in the Army straight out of high school and deployed to Afghanistan twice with the 82^nd^ Airborne Division. After I got out, I spent a few years doing civilian analyst work. With a carefully arranged, skills-based résumé---one which omitted my current occupation---I figured I could maybe get through an initial interview.

The catch, however, is that there's only one "Laura Jedeed" with an internet presence, and it takes about five seconds of Googling to figure out how I feel about ICE, the Trump administration, and the country's general right-wing project. My social media pops up immediately, usually with a preview of my latest posts condemning Trump's unconstitutional, authoritarian power grab. Scroll down and you'll find articles with titles like "What I Saw in LA Wasn't an Insurrection; It Was a Police Riot" and "Inside Mike Johnson's Ties to a Far-Right Movement to Gut the Constitution." Keep going for long enough and you might even find my dossier on AntifaWatch, a right-wing website that lists alleged members of the supposed domestic terror organization. I am, to put it mildly, a less-than-ideal recruit.

In short, I figured---at least back then---that my military background would be enough to get me in the door for a good look around ICE's application process, and then even the most cursory background check would get me shown that same door with great haste.

The ICE expo in the Dallas area, where my application journey began, required attendees to register for a specific time slot, presumably to prevent throngs of eager patriots from flooding the event and overwhelming the recruiters. But when I showed up at 9 a.m., the flood was notably absent: there was no line to check in and no line to go through security. I walked down nearly empty hallways, past a nearly empty drug testing station, and into the event proper, where a man directed me to a line to wait in for an interview. I took my spot at the end; there were only six people ahead of me.

While I waited, I looked around the ESports Stadium Arlington---an enormous blacked-out event space optimized for video game tournaments that has a capacity of 2,500. During my visit, there couldn't have been more than 150 people there.

Hopeful hires stood in tiny groups or found seats in the endless rows of cheap folding chairs that faced a stage ripped straight from Tron. Everything was bright-blue and lit-up and sci-fi-future angular. Above the monolithic platform hung three large monitors. The side monitors displayed static propaganda posters that urged the viewer to DEFEND THE HOMELAND and JOIN ICE TODAY, while the large central monitor played two short videos on loop: about 10 minutes of propaganda footage, again and again and again.

After about 15 minutes of waiting, an extraordinarily normal-looking middle-aged woman waved me forward. I sat across the black folding table from her on one of the uncomfortable black chairs. She asked for my name and date of birth, then whether I am over 40 (I am 38). Did I have law enforcement experience? No. Military experience? Yes. Did I retire from the military at 20+ years, or leave once my enlistment was up? The latter, I told her, then repeated my carefully rehearsed, completely true explanation for why the résumé I'd submitted had a large gap. "I had a little bit of a quarter-life crisis. Ended up going to college for part of that time, and since then I've been kind of---gig economy stuff."

She was spectacularly uninterested: "OK. And what location is your preference?"

After some dithering, I settled on my home state of New York. That was the last question; the entire process took less than six minutes. The woman took my résumé and placed the form she'd been filling out on top. "They are prioritizing current law enforcement first. They're going to adjudicate your résumé," she told me. If my application passed muster, I'd receive an email about next steps, which could arrive in the next few hours but would likely take a few days. I left, thanked her for her time, and prepared to hear back never.

The expo event was part of ICE's massive recruitment campaign for the foot soldiers it needs to execute the administration's dream of a deportation campaign large enough to shift America's demographic balance back whiteward. You've probably seen evidence of it yourself: ICE's "Defend the homeland" propaganda is ubiquitous enough to be the Uncle Sam "I Want You" poster of our day, though somewhere in there our nation lost the plot about the correct posture toward Nazis.

When Donald Trump took office, ICE numbered approximately 10,000. Despite this event's lackluster attendance, their recruitment push is reportedly going well; the agency reported 12,000 new recruits in 2025, which means the agency has more new recruits than old hands. That's the kind of growth that changes the culture of an agency.

Many of ICE's critics worry that the agency is hoovering up pro-Trump thugs---Jan. 6 insurrectionists, white nationalists, etc.---for a domestic security force loyal to the president. The truth, my experience suggests, is perhaps even scarier: ICE's recruitment push is so sloppy that the administration effectively has no idea who's joining the agency's ranks. We're all, collectively, in the dark about whom the state is arming, tasking with the most sensitive of law enforcement work, and then sending into America's streets.

And we are all, collectively, discovering just how deadly of an arrangement that really is.

At the end of my brief interview, the recruiter mentioned I could talk to a current deportation officer about what the job would be like. There was no line to talk to a deportation officer (did I mention how empty the place was?) and so I walked up, introduced myself to one of them, and asked about day-to-day duties.

I shouldn't expect to hit the streets right away, the agent told me. Odds were good I'd get a support position first---something like the Criminal Alien Program office. "Let's say a local police officer arrests someone out in the field for a DUI. Extremely common. Or beating their wife or whatever---all the typical crimes they commit," he said. (The "they" here being "undocumented immigrants," and while it's extremely difficult to measure, evidence suggests that "they" actually commit crimes at a lower rate than U.S.-born citizens.)

If the cops suspect they're dealing with an immigrant who doesn't have permanent legal status, they alert ICE, whose agents conduct interviews and run record checks.
If this preliminary investigation suggests that status, the person ends up in the Criminal Alien Program office for processing---which is where I would come in. "What you see on TV, with us arresting people and doing all kinds of crazy things, that's maybe 10 percent. The other 90 percent is essentially doing a bunch of paperwork," the agent said. "It takes a lot to remove somebody from the United States. Some people are subject to due process."

The officer ran down other departments I might end up in: Prosecutions, Removal Coordination Unit, or Detention. The point being that I should not expect to be a badass street officer on Day 1. "I have so many guys that come over to me, they're like, 'I'm gonna put cuffs on somebody. I'm gonna arrest somebody.' Well, you need to master this first and then we'll see about getting you on the field."

I told him that I was fine with office work---with my analyst background, it seemed like a better fit for my skill set anyway. His attitude shift was subtle, but instant and unmistakable; this was the wrong attitude and the wrong answer. "Just to be upfront, the goal is to put as many guns and badges out in the field as possible," he said.

The agent then told me a bit about his own background. Like me, he enlisted straight out of high school, then got out and vowed to get as far away from the violence of the military as possible. Like a lot of veterans, he had trouble assimilating into the civilian world. "After about six months, I was like, 'These people aren't like me. I want to be around like-minded people.' " He found his way into law enforcement. That was well over a decade ago---he's on his way to a very comfortable retirement, and he enjoys the work. "I like that instant gratification of Hey, that guy committed this crime, these X, Y, and Z, he's not even supposed to be here," he said.

I do not agree with his framing, but have no trouble understanding the appeal. Hell, it's why I enlisted in the first place. Thankfully, Afghanistan beat it out of me. If I believed what he believed, I would surely do the same thing he's doing.

I thanked him for the information and time, shook his hand, and took a seat on one of those uncomfortable folding chairs. I had a few hours before my flight back to New York City, and it made more sense to hang out than to flee the building and get good and airport drunk, regardless of how desperately I would have preferred the latter. Instead, I settled in to do what everyone does at the DMV: check my phone and people-watch. The aspiring officers fall broadly into three categories: thick-necked law enforcement types who look like they do steroids but don't know how to work out, bearded spec-ops wannabes who look like they take steroids and do know how to work out, and dorks. Pencil-necked misfits. I couldn't tell whether there were more white or Hispanic people waiting for their email, but it was close. A few Black applicants rounded out the overwhelmingly male group.

I'd been sitting around for about an hour when the video suddenly stopped and a bearded man in a black suit stepped onto the stage. He did not introduce himself---we were, I gathered, supposed to already know who he was---but it became clear he's a senior agent of some sort. "I figured it would be best if I break up the same video you've been watching for the last four hours," he said, and offered to answer any questions we might have.

One person asked about work/life balance, which the agent said is possible but not the route he's chosen. Someone else wanted to know about travel opportunities and he talked about the many places he's gone as part of the job.

Every other question during the 45 minutes the agent stood onstage pertained to the hiring process or what we could expect in training. Law enforcement types seemed especially concerned about the painful parts: Would they have to get pepper sprayed again? Would they have to get shot with a taser if they'd already qualified? Yes and probably not, respectively. The agent took the opportunity to gush about ICE's new state-of-the-art semi-automatic tasers and brand-new pepper-ball guns. "It's mostly very liberal cities---San Francisco, Los Angeles---where groups will come and try to stop ICE officers from arresting somebody. They're like, 'We're going to form a human wall against you,' " he said. "When they do that, you can just pop 'em up. Let them disperse and cry about it."

When, during a moment of protracted silence, the agent threatened to put the video back on if no one had questions, I asked about harassment and doxing. "We will prosecute people to the fullest extent of the law," he assured me, "and then people like myself will go on TV and publicly talk about how that person is now in prison to dissuade other people from doing it."

As empty as the place had been when I'd arrived, it was even emptier by the time the senior agent ended the Q&A. Somebody vastly overestimated the number of Americans willing to take a job brutalizing and disappearing hard-working men and women---even with a potential $50K bonus, even in this economy.

That may have something to do with what happened to me next.

I completely missed the email when it came. I'd kept an eye on my inbox for the next few days, but I'd grown lax when nothing came through. But then, on Sept. 3, it popped up.

"Please note that this is a TENTATIVE offer only, therefore do not end your current employment," the email instructed me. It then listed a series of steps I'd need to quickly take. I had 48 hours to log onto USAJobs and fill out my Declaration for Federal Employment, then five additional days to return the forms attached to the email. Among these forms: driver's license information, an affidavit that I've never received a domestic violence conviction, and consent for a background check. And it said: "If you are declining the position, it is not necessary to complete the action items listed below."

As I mentioned, I'd missed the email, so I did exactly none of these things.

And that might have been where this all ended---an unread message sinking to the bottom of my inbox---if not for an email LabCorp sent three weeks later. "Thank you for confirming that you wish to continue with the hiring process," it read. (To be clear, I had confirmed no such thing.) "Please complete your required pre-employment drug test**.**"

The timing was unfortunate. Cannabis is legal in the state of New York, and I had partaken six days before my scheduled test. Then again, I hadn't smoked much; perhaps with hydration I could get to the next stage. Worst-case scenario, I'd waste a small piece of ICE's gargantuan budget. I traveled to my local LabCorp, peed in a cup, and waited for a call telling me I'd failed.

Nine days later, impatience got the best of me. For the first time, I logged into USAJobs and checked my application to see if my drug test had come through. What I actually saw was so implausible, so impossible, that at first I did not understand what I was looking at.

Somehow, despite never submitting any of the paperwork they sent me---not the background check or identification info, not the domestic violence affidavit, none of it---ICE had apparently offered me a job.

According to the application portal, my pre-employment activities remained pending. And yet, it also showed that I had accepted a final job offer and that my onboarding status was "EOD"---Entered On Duty, the start of an enlistment period. I moused over the exclamation mark next to "Onboarding" and a helpful pop-up appeared. "Your EOD has occurred. Welcome to ICE!"

I clicked through to my application tracking page. They'd sent my final offer on Sept. 30, it said, and I had allegedly accepted. "Welcome to Ice. ... Your duty location is New York, New York. Your EOD was on Tuesday, September 30th, 2025."

By all appearances, I was a deportation officer. Without a single signature on agency paperwork, ICE had officially hired me.

Perhaps, if I'd accepted, they would have demanded my pre-employment paperwork, done a basic screening, realized their mistake, and fired me immediately. And yet, the pending and upcoming tasks list suggested a very different outcome. My physical fitness test had been initiated on Oct. 6, it said: three days in the future. My medical check had apparently been completed on Oct. 6.

The portal also listed my background check as completed on Oct. 6. Had I preemptively passed? Was ICE seriously going to let me start training without finding out the first thing about me? I reached out to ICE for an explanation, but never heard back.

The only thing left for me to do was press the green "Accept" button on the home page. And maybe I should have. Maybe no one would have ever checked my name and I could have written the story of a lifetime. Or maybe the agency infamous for brutalizing and disappearing people with no regard for the law or basic human rights would have figured out exactly who I am while I was in one of their facilities with no way to escape. I'm not actually a domestic terrorist sent straight from Antifa headquarters, but to a paranoid fascist regime increasingly high on their own supply, I sure look like one on paper. Self-preservation won out.

I hit "Decline," closed my browser, and took a long, deep breath.

What are we to make of all this? To be clear, I barely applied to ICE. I skipped the steps of the application process that would have clued the agency in on my lack of fitness for the position. I made no effort to hide my public loathing of the agency, what it stands for, and the administration that runs it. And they offered me the job anyway.

It's possible that I'm an aberration---perhaps I experienced some kind of computer glitch that affected my application and no one else's. But given all of the above, it seems far more likely that ICE is running an extremely leaky ship when it comes to recruitment.

With no oversight and with ICE concealing its agents' identities, it'll be extremely difficult for us to know.

There's a temptation to take some comfort in ICE's sloppiness. There's a real argument here that an agency so inept in its recruitment will also be inept at training people and carrying out its mission. We're seeing some very sloppy police work from ICE, including an inability to do basic things like throw someone down and cuff them. On some level, all of this is a reminder that their takeover is neither total nor inevitable.

But if they missed the fact that I was an anti-ICE journalist who didn't fill out her paperwork, what else might they be missing? How many convicted domestic abusers are being given guns and sent into other people's homes? How many people with ties to white supremacist organizations are indiscriminately targeting minorities on principle, regardless of immigration status? How manyremoveds and pedophiles are working in ICE detention centers with direct and unsupervised access to a population that will be neither believed nor missed? How are we to trust ICE's allegedly thorough investigations of the people they detain and deport when they can't even keep their HR paperwork straight?

And if they're not going to screen me out, what hope is there of figuring out which recruit might one day turn into a trigger-happy agent who would forget that law enforcement officers are trained not to stand in front of vehicles, get jumpy, and shoot a 37-year-old woman to death on the streets of Minneapolis?

That's exactly what happened last week, and why Renee Good will never have a 38^th^ birthday, and why her children will never again be hugged by their mother.

By all appearances, the only thing ICE is screening for is a desire to work for ICE: a very specific kind of person perfectly suited for the kind of mission creep we are currently seeing. Good's murder is not an isolated incident; the American Civil Liberties Union reports a nationwide trend of ICE pointing guns at, brutalizing, and even detaining citizens who stop to film them. A Minneapolis pastor who protested ICE by chanting "We are not afraid" was detained at gunpoint by an agent who reportedly asked him: "Are you afraid now?"

I am. We all should be.

13
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/20588

Several Democratic lawmakers on Friday convened a hearing in Minnesota to hear testimony from local officials and residents about the impact that the surge of federal immigration agents in the state has had on their lives.

The hearing, which was organized by Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), featured elected leaders such as Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison and Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, as well as testimony from US citizens who had been taken into custody by federal agents.

Patty O'Keefe, a 36-year-old US citizen, told lawmakers that her encounter with US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents began when she and a friend had received a report that legal observers in her neighborhood were being pepper sprayed.

She said they found the agents and began following them in their car while honking their horn and blowing whistles to alert others in the area to their presence.

The ICE agents subsequently stopped their vehicle, surrounded the car, discharged pepper spray into it, then smashed the car's windows and dragged out both O'Keefe and her friend.

O'Keefe said that after being detained by agents, they started taunting her, with one agent telling her, "You guys got to stop obstructing us, that's why this lesbian bitch is dead," an apparent reference to Minneapolis resident Renee Good, who was killed by an ICE agent last week.

O'Keefe said this comment left her feeling "rage and sadness," while also asking why anyone would say something like that about the victim of a horrific killing.

"Then I remembered that cruelty and humiliation were probably the point," she said.

O'Keefe was then taken to the BH Whipple Federal Building in St. Paul, where she was put into leg shackles and placed in a detention area that had been reserved for US citizens.

While in detention for eight hours at the building, she said she saw people being subjected to inhumane conditions.

"I saw holding cells with over a dozen people each, and a large holding cell of between 40 to 50 people," she said. "Most of the people there were Hispanic and East African, both women and men. Some cells had no room for people to sit or lay down. Most people I saw were staring straight ahead, not talking, despondent and grief stricken. I know I'll never forget their faces."

Mubashir, a 20-year-old US citizen of Somali descent, recounted his detention by federal immigration agents in December, when officers tackled him and took him into custody even though he offered to show them his identification proving his citizenship.

"I repeated, 'I'm a citizen, I have an ID,' the agent kept saying, 'That don't matter,'" Mubashir explained.

Like O'Keefe, Mubashir was taken to the St. Paul ICE detention facility, where he was shackled. Unlike O'Keefe, however, he was told that he was going to be deported despite having proof of his legal status.

Eventually, Mubashir was able to show a photo of his passport card to an official at the facility who instructed officers to release him from custody.

"It is difficult to believe this happened to me," he said. "I knew the president had made statements about Somali people and there would be additional ICE officers in the Twin Cities... But I did not think this would happen to me or someone in my family. We are all United States citizens, so we should not be at risk of being jailed or deported by ICE."

Mubashir also emphasized that "my citizenship did not protect me from being physically detained and hurt by ICE agents."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

14
15
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/20276

US Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem on Thursday was called out for making a blatantly false claim about whether federal immigration agents are arbitrarily demanding that Minnesota residents provide evidence of their legal status.

While speaking with reporters outside the White House, Noem was asked about videos that have emerged from Minneapolis showing federal agents asking passersby to give proof of citizenship.

"Is that targeted enforcement and are you advising Americans to carry proof of citizenship?" a reporter asked Noem.

"In every situation we are doing targeted enforcement," Noem said. "If we are on a target and doing an operation, there may be individuals surrounding that criminal that we may be asking who they are and why they're there, and having them validate their identity. That's what we've always done."

In reality, there have been multiple alleged instances of federal agents asking Minneapolis residents for proof of citizenship that were completely unrelated to any "targeted" enforcement operation.

A lawsuit filed by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison on Monday documented numerous such instances, including one where federal agents surrounded and questioned a driver at the Minneapolis-St. Paul airport about his citizenship, and another where US Department of Homeland Security agents approached a team of Minneapolis Public Works employees and questioned them on their citizenship.

A Monday report from the St. Paul Pioneer Press, meanwhile, quoted a St. Paul resident who said federal agents knocked on her door and asked her to help them "identify Hmong and Asian households" in her neighborhood.

Given the extensive evidence of federal agents hounding Minnesotans for proof of their citizenship, many critics were quick to call out Noem for dishonesty.

"This is just a lie," wrote Democratic strategist Matt McDermott in a social media post. "There has been extensive reporting on ICE doing random door-to-door neighborhood patrols looking for anyone who is not white."

NPR reporter Sergio Martínez-Beltrán countered Noem's claims by describing an incident he saw first-hand.

"A few days ago, I witnessed how immigration agents stopped at a parking lot and asked drivers charging their electric cars for proof of citizenship or legal status," he explained.

Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said that Noem's claims were false not just in the context of Minneapolis, but of other US cities as well.

"In Los Angeles, for example, DHS officers outright admitted to doing 'roving patrols,' which are NOT targeted," he explained.

Another first-hand account was given by Dan Mihalopoulos, an investigative reporter at Chicago-based public radio station WBEZ.

"Last month, I saw Border Patrol roll up to random Asians in the parking lot of a Costco in Illinois asking if they are citizens," he said. "They backed off a woman who spoke English without an accent. But a Chinese shopper had to show his green card to agents."

Democrats on the US House Homeland Security Committee accused Noem of supporting racial profiling by law enforcement.

"If you’re Black or brown, Kristi Noem thinks it’s fine to stop you, cuff you, and demand proof you’re American," they wrote. "Republicans support racial profiling. They want it in your neighborhood."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

16
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/20323

A federal appeals court on Thursday threw out a lower court’s June order to release Palestinian activist Mahmoud Khalil from detention, triggering questions among his supporters about whether the government can immediately re-detain Khalil for deportation.

In short, Khalil is safe from further detention — for about a month and a half, his legal team told The Intercept. Khalil is fighting two separate legal battles: one in federal court, and the second in immigration court.

“We understand there’s a lot of concern about whether ICE can go pick him up again right now,” said Brett Max Kaufman, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union and member of Khalil’s legal team. “Before the appeals process is over, that cannot happen.”

Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents detained Khalil, a green card holder, at his New York apartment in March and quickly flew him to a Louisiana detention center. He spent the next three months there while the government sought to deport him, missing the birth of his child.

Khalil was released in June after New Jersey District Judge Michael Farbiarz ruled that the Trump administration’s detention of Khalil was likely illegal and violated his First Amendment rights. As a graduate student at Columbia University, Khalil had been a vocal participant in student activism opposing Israel’s genocide in Gaza — putting a target on his back for the Trump administration, which has sought to crush advocacy for Palestine under the guise of combating antisemitism.

On Thursday, the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which rules on appeals in New Jersey, Delaware, and Pennsylvania, overturned the New Jersey federal court’s release order in a split 2–1 decision. The two majority opinion judges — appointees of Presidents George W. Bush and Donald Trump — stated the lower court didn’t have jurisdiction over the free speech claims case, while the dissenting judge, a Biden appointee, argued it did and Khalil’s release should hold.

Even though the appeals court tossed the order that bailed Khalil out of detention, the decision does not immediately go into effect, according to court rules.

Thursday’s decision goes into effect in 45 days, at which point Khalil would again be exposed to detention. Before that deadline, Khalil can appeal the 3rd Circuit’s recent decision.

That doesn’t mean Thursday’s decision isn’t alarming, Kaufman said — both for Khalil personally and for free speech rights overall.

“If this decision stands, the government might be able to snatch you up for your speech and put you in detention for years.”

The decision essentially endorses the idea that even if someone’s free speech rights were violated, Kaufman added, the government can still detain and seek to deport them for their activism, making them wait in detention as they challenge their case in immigration court.

“That just defeats the entire purpose of the First Amendment,” Kaufman said. “If this decision stands, the government might be able to snatch you up for your speech and put you in detention for years.”

[

Related

Judge Finds Rubio and Noem Intentionally Targeted Pro-Palestine Activists to Chill Speech](https://theintercept.com/2025/09/30/rubio-noem-deport-aaup-ruling-free-speech/)

In a statement released by the ACLU on Thursday, Khalil called the ruling “deeply disappointing” but reaffirmed his commitment to activism for Palestinian rights.

“The door may have been opened for potential re-detainment down the line, but it has not closed our commitment to Palestine and to justice and accountability,” he said. “I will continue to fight, through every legal avenue and with every ounce of determination, until my rights, and the rights of others like me, are fully protected.”

If Khalil pursues another appeal, it would allow all 14 judges — rather than the customary three — on the appeals court to weigh in on the case and possibly reverse Thursday’s decision, potentially reviving Khalil’s release order.

Thursday’s appeals court decision also allows the Trump administration to resume its separate fight to get Khalil deported in immigration court. There, Trump administration attorneys have used an obscure immigration policy to argue Khalil’s activism for Palestine has adverse consequences for U.S. foreign policy. The government has claimed Khalil has ties to the militant Palestinian group Hamas, which attorneys assert is false. Trump attorneys have also accused Khalil of lying on his green card application.

[

Related

Deportation, Inc.](https://theintercept.com/2025/12/19/deportation-abrego-garcia-ice-immigration/)

In April, an immigration judge in Louisiana ruled that the government does have grounds to deport Khalil, but attorneys appealed, and the decision which is now being reviewed by the Board of Immigration appeals. If the board, known as the BIA, sides with Khalil, the Trump administration’s immigration case against him would end.

If the board sides with the government, upholding the immigration removal, Khalil could pursue an additional appeal in the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which governs decisions in Louisiana. Such a process may take months to play out. Appeals courts, in such immigration cases, can also offer a stay, halting the government’s deportation order, even after a BIA decision.

New York City Mayor Zohran Mamdani, a prominent ally of Khalil’s, condemned the court’s ruling in a statement on Thursday.

“Last year’s arrest of Mahmoud Khalil was more than just a chilling act of political repression, it was an attack on all of our constitutional rights,” Mamdani wrote on X. “Now, as the crackdown on pro-Palestinian free speech continues, Mahmoud is being threatened with rearrest. Mahmoud is free—and must remain free.”

Other pro-Palestinian activists detained by the Trump administration, such as former Columbia University student Mohsen Mahdawi, who is also a green card holder, and Tufts University doctoral student Rümeysa Öztürk, are awaiting their appeals. The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals is reviewing similar arguments for Mahdawi and Öztürk, who were both released last year after federal judges also ruled their constitutional rights were violated.

Leqaa Kordia, a Palestinian woman who was arrested in 2024 while protesting outside Columbia University and was detained in March by the Trump administration, remains in immigration detention in Texas. The government continues to allege she also has ties with Hamas, which she continues to refute in court.

The post Despite Court Ruling, ICE Can’t Detain Mahmoud Khalil — For Now appeared first on The Intercept.


From The Intercept via This RSS Feed.

17
14
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by Evilphd666@hexbear.net to c/acab@hexbear.net
 
 

Operations Benchwarmer, Tidal Wave, Abracadabra, Dust Off, Fleur De Lis — these are just a few of the secret programs recently undertaken by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. ICE has become a self appointed bouncer for America under Donald Trump, enlisting tens of thousands of federal, state, and local police and intelligence departments and agencies to not just root out “illegals,” but also exploit them for intelligence, leaked documents show.

A Border Patrol official outraged by ICE’s conduct has leaked to me this and other documents providing an unprecedented glimpse into ICE’s undeclared activities across the country. Many of these operations and their codenames have not been previously reported.

A 15-page long document, marked “LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE,” details 21 different “major” ICE operations resulting, so it says, in 6,852 apprehensions since June. From Operation A, a covert effort to develop informants among immigrants in detention, to Operation Benchwarmer, which alone spans the deployment of 2,000 “intelligence assets” across the country, the document gives a sense of how aggressively ICE is scouring neighborhoods and developing sources to spy on immigrants and Americans alike.

18
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/19977

Amid heated protests in Minneapolis following the killing of Renee Good by Immigration and Customs Enforcement officer Jonathan Ross, federal agents have repeatedly invoked Good’s death to threaten the lives of observers and demonstrators in Minnesota.

In multiple confrontations in the Minneapolis area, agents repeatedly referred to civilians learning their lesson — in an apparent nod to the use of deadly force in Ross’s killing. In a video posted to Reddit, a masked ICE agent can be heard repeatedly admonishing a driver to “go home to your kids.”

“Stop fucking following us,” the ICE agent screams.

Phil Maddox, a local resident, told The Intercept he recorded the video on Sunday morning during a quick drive around his neighborhood to keep tabs on federal agents in the area. After briefly following one unmarked car, he said another car boxed him into an alley, and he found himself surrounded by agents, including at least one with his gun drawn.

As the video continues, Maddox pans his phone camera to reveal another agent standing by the passenger-side door with a handgun drawn. Stomping back past the car, the first agent continues his tirade, telling Maddox that he won’t “like the outcome” if he follows the agents.

“You did not learn from what just happened?” the ICE agent asks. “Go home to your kids.” Maddox said he immediately interpreted the question as a threat.

“They’re saying, ‘Get in our way and we’ll shoot you,’” Maddox said. “‘We have immunity, we can do what we want, and you should fear us.’”

Understanding what “learning your lesson” means as a warning goes beyond Maddox.The phrasing has been widely interpreted as a threat by protesters, activists, and advocates on the ground in Minneapolis.

“That’s a veiled threat, 1,000 percent,” Luis Argueta, a spokesperson for the immigrant rights group Unidos Minnesota, told The Intercept. “They can’t exactly say it, but the way they reference Renee Good — they’re using that to strike fear.”

“That’s a veiled threat, 1,000 percent.”

The threats have come amid broader scenes of violence inflicted against protesters in the Twin Cities by roving bands of ICE and Border Patrol agents. Thousands of agents have been deployed in phases by President Donald Trump as part of a massive immigration crackdown in the Twin Cities. Over the weekend, agents were captured on camera pepper-spraying observers and smashing car windows while followed closely by protesters blowing whistles and yelling at them. (The Department of Homeland Security, the parent agency of ICE and Border Patrol, did not respond to a request for comment.)

“This is a classic situation of overreacting, over-policing, and ultimately use of excessive force,” said Andrew G. Celli Jr., an attorney specializing in police misconduct and constitutional rights. “It’s tragic but predictable that the reaction has been as strong as it has been. And of course, when you have that kind of reaction that gets provoked, then the police, whose job it is to oversee and control crowds and demonstrations — they can sometimes overreact, and so it becomes a vicious cycle.”

On Sunday, Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem announced that hundreds more federal agents would be deploying to the region, adding to the more than 2,000 agents who made up the surge that began on January 6. The violence continued on Monday as federal agents unleashed clouds of tear gas on a residential street, according to footage posted to social media.

Monday’s clashes set the stage for a lawsuit filed by state and local officials in Minnesota seeking to end Trump’s surge of federal agents, which the administration claims is aimed at combating social-services fraud in the state.

In an 80-page complaint filed in Minnesota District Court, the state of Minnesota, joined by the city governments of Saint Paul and Minneapolis, detailed a litany of abuses by federal agents under the aegis of what the Trump Administration has dubbed “Operation Metro Surge,” and the social, political, and economic impact it has had on the state. The suit, led by Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison, demands an end to the operation.

[

Related

We Asked for ICE Bodycam Footage. DHS Claims They Don’t Have It.](https://theintercept.com/2026/01/09/dhs-kristi-noem-ice-bodycam-records-foia/)

“When the federal government itself violates legal rights and civic norms on such a broad scale and public panic is high, state and city governments bear the costs—both tangible and intangible,” the complaint read. “Defendants’ agents’ reckless tactics endanger the public safety, health, and welfare of all Minnesotans. Additionally, Defendants’ agents’ inflammatory and unlawful policing tactics provoke the protests the federal government seeks to suppress.”

More than one agent has been caught on camera in recent days invoking the idea of “learning” a “lesson.” In a video posted to TikTok, one federal agent warns two separate people in separate vehicles that they have not learned the lessons of recent days — an apparent allusion to the killing of Good.

@milaisconfused44♬ original sound – mila❕⸆⸉

“You don’t fucking learn — what’s fuckin’ happened in the last couple of days,” the agent says to someone as two other agents pat down the occupants of a car. Seconds later, the agent approaches a woman filming from a second vehicle and issues a similar warning.

“Listen, have y’all not learned from the past couple of days?” says the agent, who was clad in tactical gear without any insignia identifying his agency. “Have you not learned?”

“Learned what?” the woman responds. “What’s our lesson here? What do you want us to learn?”

In response, the agent appears to swat at the phone in the woman’s hand.

“Following fucking federal agents,” he says, before the video cuts out.

It was unclear what happened after the apparent swat at the phone, but the original poster of the video later said on TikTok that both she and the woman filming were safe.

Numerous other videos have captured agents violently attacking protesters, including one agent who appeared to tackle a man filming an interaction in the street, another chasing down and tackling a man at a gas station, and multiple agents piling onto a Richfield Target employee in the store entryway.

In multiple instances, agents can be heard accusing protesters of impeding their efforts. Filming the police, though, is not a crime. A majority of courts repeatedly and across jurisdictions have held that there is a constitutional right to record police and other law enforcement carrying out their duties in public places, so long as an observer doesn’t interfere with officials and complies with reasonable orders, such as keeping a safe distance.

[

Read our complete coverage

Chilling Dissent ----------------](https://theintercept.com/collections/chilling-dissent/)

“You can follow them around, you can film them, you can say, ‘Hey, fuckhead,’” said Celli, who is a partner at Emery Celli Brinckerhoff Abady Ward & Maazel LLP. “But I will tell you, after 25 years of representing people who do just that: You will likely get arrested. The Constitution is only as good as the people willing to follow it.”

Adding to the chaos, Celli said, is the fact that the agents from ICE and Border Patrol may be out of their depth when it comes to street-level enforcement.

“These guys are not street cops,” Celli said. “They’re not accustomed to this, and they’re not trained for this. This isn’t what they’re supposed to be doing.”

Maddox, who remained calm throughout the recorded interaction on Sunday, said only later did fear set in over what could have happened. He remained angry, however, about the impact that the raids were having on his children and on his neighbors, many of whom are Latino.

“No one feels safer with [ICE] here,” he said. “My kids are scared their friends are going to get nabbed, or that their friends’ parents or relatives or their neighbors will get nabbed.”

The post Federal Agents Keep Invoking Killing of Renee Good to Threaten Protesters in Minnesota appeared first on The Intercept.


From The Intercept via This RSS Feed.

19
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/19544

Since the murder of Renee Nicole Good and the U.S. attack on Venezuela, an emerging movement has taken the streets to oppose Trump’s reactionary and authoritarian agenda.

This weekend saw thousands of people mobilize across the country — including in Detroit — to demand justice for Good, no war on Venezuela, and for ICE to get out of our communities.

Detroit Will Breathe (DWB) brought together a coalition to organize a press conference and rally to bring the voice of the movement to the doorsteps of Detroit City Hall. The organization is hoping to turn up the heat on city officials while uniting different groups across the city.

The press conference and rally is supported by the People’s Assembly/Asamblea Popular, Detroit Justice Center, Black Lives Matter Detroit, the Metro Detroit DSA, We The People Dissent, The Coalition for Police Transparency and Accountability, Moratorium NOW!, and Anti-Fascist Organizing Committee.

The press conference also featured clergy, legal and civil right advocates, and elected officials who want an end to ICE activity in Detroit and across the state.

Throughout the speeches, political activists and elected officials described the fear that many in the immigrant community feel of ICE deporting their families. One notable example was from State Senator Chang, who tearfully described numerous instances of people being detained due not having the proper paperwork, being shuffled to different facilities to a point where families could not locate their family members and even those who have died while under ICE detention.

Labor, Churches, and Major Social Justice Organizations Must Act

A central aspect of the press conference was to call for action by labor, churches, and traditional civil rights groups in Detroit to mobilize to fight Trump. The only time Detroiters have made meaningful gains is when they have mobilized. It was workers fighting in Detroit that helped build the labor movement in the early 20th Century. And it was Black workers and community members mobilizing against police brutality that got the violently racist S.T.R.E.S.S. police squad disbanded in the 1970s.

Today, we need the United Auto Workers (UAW), the Service Employees International Union (SEIU), The Detroit Federation of Teachers (DFT) The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP), and others to mobilize their base to join the movement against Trump. As Left Voice member and SEIU member Julia Wallace from Los Angeles explains, we need the combativeness of BLM, the internationalism of the pro-Palestine movement, and the workers power of Italy’s “Block Everything” general strike.

Coalition Work Based on Class Independence

DWB believes the current moment calls for broad unity against Trump’s reactionary attacks. The group seeks to amplify anyone prepared to speak out against the president and call on people to mobilize, even progressive elected officials. However, the movement must have space where it can organize itself collectively, democratically, and on a politically independent basis — even when it shares space with politicians ready to speak out. Many have been frustrated by the Democrats’ failure to be a strong and consistent opposition to Trump.

The Democrats who run Detroit City Hall should have banned ICE from operating on city property, stopped sharing information and co-operating with ICE years ago. And it should do it now.

If ICE is kicked out of Detroit, it will be because of our organizing and mobilizing from the bottom up. That is why DWB is part of Detroit People’s Assembly/Asamblea Popular and is promoting mass meetings where organizations and individuals can get together to organize and discuss and debate strategy for the movement.

The next mass meeting is January 17, 3-5pm at Central United Methodist Church on 2026 Woodward Ave. in Detroit. For more information, follow DWB’s on Instagram.

The post Activists Hold Press Conference and Rally to Demand “ICE Out of Detroit” appeared first on Left Voice.


From Left Voice via This RSS Feed.

20
104
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by InevitableSwing@hexbear.net to c/acab@hexbear.net
 
 
21
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/19016

Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem sat for a live interview with CNN's Jake Tapper on Sunday morning about the killing of Renee Nicole Good by a federal immigration agent last week and lied straight through her teeth to the American public about what happened.

Since Good was shot and killed by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent Jonathan Ross on Wednesday, members of the Trump administration have consistently tried to portray the shooting as justified despite indisputable video evidence contradicting their false claims and narratives.

Noem, who released her first statement on the shooting within three hours of Good's killing, has joined Vice President JD Vance as the leading liars and propagandists—with plenty of help from people like Tricia McLaughlin, Assistant Secretary for Public Affairs at the US Department of Homeland Security, and Border Czar Tom Homan—within the Trump administration.

In her exchange with Tapper, who confronted Noem over the blatant chasm between her claims about what happened—she called Good a "domestic terrorist" who "attacked" federal agents—and what anyone with two good eyes who watches the variety of videos made public of the shooting can plainly see for themselves.

Tapper: Why did you not wait for an investigation before making your comments?

Noem: Well, everything that I've said has been proven to be factual, and the truth.

Tapper: With all due respect the first thing you said was not what happened.

Noem: It absolutely is pic.twitter.com/0yGeWSr9aa
— Acyn (@Acyn) January 11, 2026

Various angles of the video, including audio from Good's final moments, have shown that she was not "yelling" at officers or "attacking" them in any way. Video shows several vehicles driving around her car in the minutes prior to the shooting. Good has a visible smile on her face when she says, directly to Ross as he circles her car, "That's fine, dude. I'm not mad at you." Detailed analyses of the footage shows Ross could just as easily have stepped aside—without drawing and firing his weapon—in order to dodge the moving car, which he did—even with firing the fatal shots—without injury or harm to others.

Asked by Tapper why she did not wait for the full facts before speaking out publicly to demonize Good and defend the officer, Noem falsely claimed that "everything that I've said has been proven to be factual, and the truth."

That's a lie.

"With all due respect," Tapper responded, "the first thing you said was not what happened."

"It is absolutely what happened," Noem said, lying once again about her initial comments and their relationship to what factually transpired.

"It should be terrifying to every American how Noem lies," said James Abrenio, a criminal defense attorney, in a social media post on Sunday. "She doesn't sweat or move uncomfortably. She just doesn't care. This is what Trump has created. An environment where you only get in trouble if you don't lie. Even about an officer shooting a woman in the face on video."

Noem, in the interview, goes on to claim that Good's behavior fits the textbook definition of "domestic terrorism," despite scores of law enforcement and civil liberties experts who have reviewed the video saying that Ross' behavior betrayed basic police training about how to deal with a routine traffic stop or de-escalate a situation involving a motor vehicle in a roadway.

When Tapper tries to pin Noem down, asking her to explain what she thinks Good was trying to do when she moved her car, the secretary deflects by saying the real "question" should be why are people—in this case a broadcast journalist—"arguing with the president who is trying to keep people safe?"

— (@)

Noem's overt gaslighting—telling the public something objectively contrary to available facts—has become part and parcel of the Trump administration's Orwellian approach in the president's second term.

"Kristi Noem is a stone-cold liar who has zero credibility," said Rep. Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.), the minority leader in the House, on Friday in reaction to her earlier comments about the case. "There is nothing to suggest the shooting of an unarmed woman in Minneapolis was justified. This heinous killing must be criminally investigated to the full extent of the law."

On Friday, T**he Guardian documented a litany of false claims made Noem, Trump, McLaughlin, and others, comparing them against what is factually known based on video evidence and eye-witness accounts:

The claim

“ … rioters began blocking ICE officers and one of these violent rioters weaponized her vehicle, attempting to run over our law enforcement officers in an attempt to kill them – an act of domestic terrorism” – post on X by the Department of Homeland Security.

The reality

There is simply no evidence that Good was “a violent rioter” or “domestic terrorist”. No riot was taking place before her encounter with the ICE agents, and the department could not yet have been certain of her identity at 12.43pm, the time the message was posted. There is no evidence that Good – a poet and mother – was a terrorist.

The claim

“ … the woman driving the car was very disorderly, obstructing and resisting, who then violently, willfully, and viciously ran over the ICE Officer” – post on Truth Social by Donald Trump.

The reality

Video of the incident shows that Good was not “disorderly”, and had reversed her car and allowed at least one ICE vehicle to pass before other agents confronted her. A separate video clearly shows that the officer who fired the fatal shots walked up to the front of Good’s car, which was turning away from him as it began to move forward, and he remained on his feet as the vehicle passed him.

The claim

“An ICE officer, fearing for his life, the lives of his fellow law enforcement and the safety of the public, fired defensive shots … The ICE officers who were hurt are expected to make full recoveries” – Tricia McLaughlin, homeland security assistant secretary, in a post on X.

The reality

The officer who killed Good was not in the pathway of her car when he began firing, analysis of the video shows. Two other officers were beside the car, and no members of the public were seen to be in harm’s way. There is no evidence that any ICE officer was injured.

According to The Atlantic's Adam Serwer, such "blatant lies" by the administration in the wake of Good's killing serve various purposes:

They perpetuate the false narrative that federal agents are in constant peril and therefore justified in using lethal force at the slightest hint of danger. They assure federal agents that they can harm or even kill American citizens with impunity, and warn those who might be moved to protest Trump’s immigration policies of the same thing. Perhaps most grim, they communicate to the public that if you happen to be killed by a federal agent, your government will bear false witness to the world that you were a terrorist.

Following the DHS secretary's latest comments on Sunday, Democratic Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker, also speaking on Tapper's show, said Noem "needs to resign or be impeached."


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

22
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/18933

Since Wednesday, Minnesotans have been flooding the streets of South Minneapolis where their neighbor was shot and killed during an ICE raid. They have spent early mornings and late nights at the Whipple Federal Building, where ICE agents deploy each morning and return each night. They have spent their midnight hours protesting outside of the hotels that house the ICE agents terrorizing their communities. As the work week came to a close, protests grew even larger.

We landed in Minneapolis on Friday night, arriving at the downtown hotel where ICE agents stay. Hundreds of people lined the streets all around the building, carting drum kits, noise makers, trumpets, whistles, and even fireworks to make as much noise as possible. The message was, quite literally, loud and clear: ICE agents terrorize Minneapolis, so Minneapolis will give them no peace. Even as temperatures dipped below freezing and snow started falling, our numbers only grew. Folks in nearby apartment buildings, bars, and restaurants came out to join the march. The noise created was so deafening, protestors passed out earplugs to one another. The fury of the crowd was aimed not only at the ICE agents who kidnap and kill their community members, but at the Trump administration who deployed them. ICE has been in Minneapolis for months, but two thousand additional agents were sent by Trump last week with special instructions to target the large Somali community of the Twin Cities.

Fed up, protestors brought signs reading “Trump is the real terrorist” and “Trump: end the war on immigrants!” One protestor, a school therapist, shared her reason for joining the march: “The children I work with are traumatized. They are traumatized by this administration and they are traumatized by the whole political system. We as school workers have an obligation not to be neutral in this situation. I will do everything in my power to bring about change for the students I work with.”

At 9:30, police ordered protestors to stop and disperse, declaring the protest an unlawful assembly. By 10pm, police had begun making arrests, ultimately detaining thirty protestors.

The next morning, in frigid five-degree weather, protestors rallied once again, trudging through heavy snow and across slick, icy sidewalks to convene at Powderhorn Park, just blocks from where Renee Nicole Good was killed. This same park was the site of countless protests, rallies, and community meetings during the 2020 Black Lives Matter protests—George Floyd was murdered in the very same neighborhood five and a half years earlier. By the time we arrived at 1pm, thousands of people had gathered in the park and filled the surrounding streets. A contingent of teachers from the Minneapolis Federation of Teachers marched together, carrying a banner which read, “Education not deportation.” One elementary school teacher spoke with Left Voice, saying, “I’m tired. I’m mad. I want them gone—I want ICE out of my city. I want my kids to feel safe again. Enough is enough, I have to be out here, I can’t stay silent.”

Another teacher working in a Title 1 school in South Minneapolis expressed that she was furious with the Trump administration, but also with Minneapolis mayor Jacob Frey for his complicity: “I need people to understand that Mayor Frey is not on our side, he’s the reason that our neighbors live on the streets, he destroys encampments and defunds community resources. He has been doing only the bare minimum, there’s so much more he could be doing to protect our communities and protect our schools and he won’t do it.”

Also represented in the crowd were contingents from left groups across the city, including Socialist Alternative, with signs like “Abolish ICE, fund our schools” and “Democrats won’t save us.” The Twin Cities chapter of the Revolutionary Communists of America organized a contingent whose signs read “Minnesota AFL-CIO: Call a general strike!” Also showing out in huge numbers were the Democratic Socialists of America, the Sunrise Movement—a group that fights for climate justice and against authoritarianism, and the People’s Action Coalition Against Trump. Beyond the organizations present, thousands of individuals joined the march, bringing signs like “My parents fought for my rights, now I will fight for theirs,” and “Indigenous people for immigrant rights.” The march, from beginning to end, stretched nearly three miles, covering streets throughout South Minneapolis. City bus drivers, folks in cars driving by, and workers in local business waved and clapped, shouting their support and calling out, “Fuck ICE.”

As we write, protestors continue to fill the Minneapolis streets, both at Powderhorn Park and at the Whipple Federal Building.

The last two days in Minneapolis have seen huge showings of fury against ICE and the Trump administration and solidarity with immigrants in the U.S. As ICE continues to reign terror on cities across the nation, this movement must massify, connecting the struggle against ICE at home with the struggle against imperialist intervention in Venezuela abroad.

Minneapolis has been the eye of the storm before, inspiring one of the largest social movements in history in 2020–we must continue to organize together to create a fighting movement once again, both in the Twin Cities and beyond.

The post No Peace for ICE: Minneapolis Protests Trump’s War on Immigrants and Repression appeared first on Left Voice.


From Left Voice via This RSS Feed.

23
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/18879

Last week, the Trump administration launched a blatant neocolonial offensive in Venezuela, kidnapping its president, Nicolás Maduro, and his wife, Cilia Flores, and declaring that the U.S. will “run” Venezuela in order to plunder its oil resources.

This imperialist aggression abroad has been matched by brutal repression at home. This week, ICE agents shot and killed Renée Nicole Good while she was observing an ICE raid and later driving away from the scene. She is the ninth person ICE has shot since September 2025.

These events are not isolated; they are two faces of the same imperialist beast. The racism and chauvinism that have Trump treating Latin America as a playground for U.S. profits are the same forces militarizing our streets. Trump’s agenda relies on terrorizing immigrant neighbors and criminalizing dissent—whether it targets another country or an activist standing up for their community here at home.

Despite the Trump administration’s attempts to paint immigrants as violent criminals and criminalize those who defend them, the real reign of terror is being carried out by ICE and federal forces that have militarized our cities. Immigrants have not made our cities unsafe; Trump’s racist and xenophobic assault on their rights and existence has.

This weekend, from Minneapolis to New York City to Los Angeles and beyond, over 1,000 actions and demonstrations have been called in major cities against Trump’s attacks—both his aggression toward Venezuela and ICE’s presence in our streets.

Thousands are beginning to recognize that the same imperialist regime attacking working people abroad is attacking us here at home. It is urgent that we unite workers and oppressed people across borders to defeat this offensive.

Since Trump’s attacks last weekend, some unions and locals have already rejected U.S. imperialist interventions and issued calls to mobilize. United Auto Workers Local 4811 (UAW 4811), which represents nearly 50,000 workers at the University of California, released a statement critical of Trump’s attacks on Venezuela. In New York City, unions such as PSC-CUNY, UAW Region 9A, UAW Local 2110 (LAAS), and Laborers’ International Union Local 79, among others, are joining Sunday’s mobilizations. The rest of the labor movement has to follow suit.

Workers and the labor movement have a special role to play in denouncing Trump’s increasing authoritarianism that threatens the working class and oppressed across borders. Trump said only “own morality” and his “own mind” can stop his agenda, but we know that isn’t the case; as we saw with the general strikes in Italy against the genocide in Gaza, even the threat of workers shutting it down against imperialism is powerful enough to check the capitalist powers’ impunity.

Building such a force in the heart of imperialism — with workers, students, and the masses in the United States denouncing the role of their own government at home and abroad, and organizing to fight back — is essential to advancing the struggle against imperialism and the Far Right across the globe and within the United States.

The mobilizations this weekend are a powerful show of solidarity with immigrant communities and strengthen the struggle of people in countries threatened by U.S. imperialism. We must mobilize with all our forces to demand ICE out of our cities and U.S. imperialism out of Venezuela and all of Latin America. As Left Voice, we join these mobilizations independently of both Republicans and Democrats, and hold no illusions in Congress or the institutions of the imperialist state.

At the same time, we act independently of Maduro’s government, which — through authoritarianism and austerity — has undermined the capacity of the Venezuelan working class to resist the current imperialist offensive.

Our perspective is one of class independence and internationalism, grounded in the power of the working class in the United States, Latin America, and beyond — the only force capable of defeating imperialism.

**U.S. out of Venezuela and all of Latin America!****Abolish ICE!****Free Nicolás Maduro and Cilia Flores!**Down with the Donroe Doctrine!

Across the Americas, Mobilize and Strike for Venezuela and Latin America!


If you’re in New York City, join the Left Voice contingent at the No Wars, No Kings, No ICE protest on Sunday, January 11. We will meet at 12:30 p.m. at the intersection of E 60th street & 5th Ave.

The post All Out Against ICE, Trump, and U.S. Imperialism appeared first on Left Voice.


From Left Voice via This RSS Feed.

24
 
 

The date is notable. I didn't know evidence, data, and information could be gathered and comprehensibly analyzed so fast!

January 8, 2026

"FOP Stands with ICE"

Minnesota Fraternal Order of Police Condemns Rhetoric

(Minneapolis, MN) The Minnesota Fraternal Order of Police stands with the men and women of Law Enforcement across the country. Over the past month, while Federal law enforcement has been doing their job in Minnesota, political and community leaders have condemned and vilified them.

The hateful and anti-law enforcement rhetoric by Mayor Frey and other politicians have made their jobs and those of local and state law enforcement more difficult and dangerous. The job of law enforcement is difficult and dangerous enough without the agitation by leaders in our state and communities.

When citizens are accused of a crime, they are given the presumption of innocence as afforded by due process. When there is an incident involving law enforcement, politicians and activists immediately condemn those involved and are scrambling for sound bites. They do not afford them the same due process but rather convict them in a public court of opinion while an investigation is barely beginning.

The Minnesota Fraternal Order of Police condemns these attacks on law enforcement and calls on politicians and leaders to stop the anti-law enforcement rhetoric and to ask for calm while the facts come out. 🇺🇸 #FOPSTRONG National Fraternal Order of Police

https://www.facebook.com/mnfop/posts/january-8-2026for-immediate-releasefop-stands-with-iceminnesota-fraternal-order-/1337523008421118/

25
 
 

cross-posted from: https://news.abolish.capital/post/18266

Federal immigration enforcement agents on Wednesday swarmed a high school in Minneapolis, where footage and photographs showed them handcuffing school staff members and firing chemical irritants at students.

According to a report from KSTP 5 Eyewitness News, the agents descended upon Roosevelt High School on Wednesday afternoon, mere hours after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer fatally shot 37-year-old Minneapolis resident Renee Nicole Good.

A witness who watched the raid described seeing administrators and staff trying to get the agents away from the building to stop them from apprehending students.

The witness also said that the agents began deploying pepper spray after some students started protesting against their presence on school property.

A Roosevelt High School official confirmed to MPR News that agents wearing US Border Patrol uniforms pepper sprayed students, while also firing pepper balls at them.

Video footage taken from the scene shows agents deploying chemical irritants at demonstrators.

An official from Roosevelt High School in Minneapolis told MPR News that armed U.S. Border Patrol officers came onto school property during dismissal Wednesday and began tackling people; they handcuffed two staff members and released chemical weapons on bystanders. pic.twitter.com/171JUUfew8
— CAIN (@XTechPulse) January 8, 2026

The school official also told MPR News that the agents handcuffed two staff members at the school, and they described getting into a physical confrontation with an agent as they were trying to tell them to leave school property.

"The guy, I’m telling him like, ‘Please step off the school grounds,’ and this dude comes up and bumps into me and then tells me that I pushed him, and he’s trying to push me, and he knocked me down,” the official said. "They don’t care. They’re just animals. I’ve never seen people behave like this.”

Meanwhile near where they killed Renee Good ICE was terrorizing a high school — and now Minneapolis has canceled school for the week.

None of this is about safety. A lawless regime with no guardrails. pic.twitter.com/H8l2nXn2FQ
— The Tennessee Holler (@TheTNHoller) January 8, 2026

In the wake of the raid on the high school, Minneapolis Public Schools announced that it would be canceling all classes for the rest of the week "out of an abundance of caution," citing "safety concerns" for faculty and students.

Celia Mejia, a Minneapolis woman whose daughter attends the Green Central Elementary School in the southern part of the city, told KSTP 5 Eyewitness News that she had to pick up her daughter on Wednesday after the school went on lockdown after federal immigration agents were spotted in the area.

"That was way too close to school to feel comfortable," Mejia said.

Julia Haas, another local resident who picked up her child at the elementary school after it went into lockdown, told KSTP 5 Eyewitness News that she was "very" frightened by the ordeal.

"Nobody should have to deal with this ever," Haas emphasized.

The reasons for the raid on the high school were unclear, and the US Department of Homeland Security did not respond to KSTP Eyewitness 5 News' or MPR News' requests for comment.


From Common Dreams via This RSS Feed.

view more: next ›