this post was submitted on 12 Apr 2026
131 points (95.8% liked)

Climate

8535 readers
282 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 20 points 1 day ago

This article is two years old

[–] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 23 points 1 day ago

While cool and all why are we posting 2 year old articles? Would be much more interested in the current numbers.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Albania, Bhutan, Nepal, Paraguay, Iceland, Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of Congo produced more than 99.7 per cent of the electricity they consumed using geothermal, hydro, solar or wind power.

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The exact thing conservatives are trying to tell you is impossible.

[–] David_Eight@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Its even possible in the US. Iowa gets 100% of their energy from renewables and Vermont is over 99%.

The numbers have been circulating that we could take all the cropland dedicated to growing corn for ethanol fuel, throw solar panels on it, and generate enough electricity to cover ALL US energy needs

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

There several different greens on that diagram and no fucking key. It's not in the article either.

Which seven?

[–] inari@piefed.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Seven countries now generate nearly all of their electricity from renewable energy sources, according to newly compiled figures.

Albania, Bhutan, Nepal, Paraguay, Iceland, Ethiopia and the Democratic Republic of Congo produced more than 99.7 per cent of the electricity they consumed using geothermal, hydro, solar or wind power.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Def not Canada. Nuclear isn't renewable.

[–] zwerg@feddit.org 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Nepal is a great example of why this doesn't tell the complete picture: if transport hasn't shifted 100% to electric, you still got a long way to go. In their defence, Nepal is making steps in this direction - people that can afford a car are choosing BYD electric cars. But for now, the vast majority are getting round on mopeds and motorcycles. The pollution in Kathnandu is acrid at times.

I would hope that Iceland is further down the path to electric vehicles.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Electric scooters and motorcycles are even better, there's less weight they have to move. I'm surprised they aren't available.

[–] zwerg@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

They are, and I know at least one person with an electric motorbike. Most people can't afford a new bike, yet alone an electric one.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 2 points 1 day ago

one of the few decent things in my life is my state has a lot of nuclear and wind and is ramping up on solar.