this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2026
63 points (98.5% liked)

news

24729 readers
876 users here now

Welcome to c/news! We aim to foster a book-club type environment for discussion and critical analysis of the news. Our policy objectives are:

We ask community members to appreciate the uncertainty inherent in critical analysis of current events, the need to constantly learn, and take part in the community with humility. None of us are the One True Leftist, not even you, the reader.

Newcomm and Newsmega Rules:

The Hexbear Code of Conduct and Terms of Service apply here.

  1. Link titles: Please use informative link titles. Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed.

  2. Content warnings: Posts on the newscomm and top-level replies on the newsmega should use content warnings appropriately. Please be thoughtful about wording and triggers when describing awful things in post titles.

  3. Fake news: No fake news posts ever, including April 1st. Deliberate fake news posting is a bannable offense. If you mistakenly post fake news the mod team may ask you to delete/modify the post or we may delete it ourselves.

  4. Link sources: All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. If you are citing a Twitter post as news, please include the Xcancel.com (or another Nitter instance) or at least strip out identifier information from the twitter link. There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance, such as Libredirect or archive them as you would any other reactionary source.

  5. Archive sites: We highly encourage use of non-paywalled archive sites (i.e. archive.is, web.archive.org, ghostarchive.org) so that links are widely accessible to the community and so that reactionary sources don’t derive data/ad revenue from Hexbear users. If you see a link without an archive link, please archive it yourself and add it to the thread, ask the OP to fix it, or report to mods. Including text of articles in threads is welcome.

  6. Low effort material: Avoid memes/jokes/shitposts in newscomm posts and top-level replies to the newsmega. This kind of content is OK in post replies and in newsmega sub-threads. We encourage the community to balance their contribution of low effort material with effort posts, links to real news/analysis, and meaningful engagement with material posted in the community.

  7. American politics: Discussion and effort posts on the (potential) material impacts of American electoral politics is welcome, but the never-ending circus of American Politics© Brought to You by Mountain Dew™ is not welcome. This refers to polling, pundit reactions, electoral horse races, rumors of who might run, etc.

  8. Electoralism: Please try to avoid struggle sessions about the value of voting/taking part in the electoral system in the West. c/electoralism is right over there.

  9. AI Slop: Don't post AI generated content. Posts about AI race/chip wars/data centers are fine.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago (2 children)

The second half of the article is about how all the gulf countries are likely to partner with Israel for security instead, to which I have to say: lol, lmao

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Any security guaranteed by Israel is really backed by the United States, so we're on the hook. Again.

And our politicians will be glad to agree, just so they can say we can't afford health care like every other fucking nation on the planet.

[–] chgxvjh@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

There is no effectual US backed security guarantee in the Persian gulf anymore, it's over.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

Honestly I think that's a genius idea; I remember native Americans also had hundreds of treaties with us and I imagine Gulf countries will get to enjoy the same benefits

[–] fox@hexbear.net 15 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"Those bases were not a deterrent against Iranian attacks. Instead, they became the target of those attacks. They became magnets for those attacks, and as a result, reliance on the American security umbrella really seems to be in shatters," Parsi explained.

Big glowing targets that say "hit us here to cripple our ability to kill your people"

One outcome of this may be the Gulf turning towards Israel to make up for their inability to "find some sort of an arrangement with Iran", he said.

Lmao

[–] huf@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

inability

weird way to phrase "complete unwillingness to even try, and shooting themselves in the dick instead"

[–] SkingradGuard@hexbear.net 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If this is true, this seems pretty significant

[–] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 8 points 4 days ago

You mean: Big if True.

[–] red_giant@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

How many days / weeks into a war with China before Guam stops?

[–] miz@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago
[–] fannin@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Having actually been there several years back I find this hard to believe, that base is pretty big. Can't really see how or why Iran would have dumped enough on it to render it completely uninhabitable or unusable. I'd love to be wrong.

[–] supafuzz@hexbear.net 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

It was really easy to hit, especially once the radars were down, so they hit it a lot

And I can see why the navy wouldn't want to use the base again, turns out that location is utterly defenseless

[–] cornishon@lemmygrad.ml 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

All those far-out bases are indefensible, the only defense they rely on is "no one would dare to attack them".

[–] TommyCatkins@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

Which goes right out the window when you attack the most heavily armed country within 500km of your base.

[–] fannin@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That's true, all those bases are. It's just the US has fought nothing but dirt farmers with AKs in years and years.

Edit: BBC is corroborating.

[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I find this hard to believe, that base is pretty big

I'm currently working in Qatar, and the first couple of days of those barrages we were hearing interceptors working almost as often as there were hours in the day; now take that, and know that Bahrain got it worse, MUCH worse. Unless it's primarily built as a well protected underground system, I'd be genuinely surprised if it was still viable.

[–] nfreak@lemmy.ml 6 points 4 days ago
[–] Evilsandwichman@hexbear.net 4 points 4 days ago

What a coincidence, the worthless thugs they housed were also useless