this post was submitted on 09 Apr 2026
469 points (99.6% liked)

Technology

83672 readers
1997 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world 43 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Meta today began removing ads from attorneys who were seeking clients that claim to have been harmed by social media

. . . Thereby proving the absolute ease and facility with which content can be rapidly identified and removed when that content removal serves the corporation, and thereby actively helping to prove the plaintiffs' cases for them.

Now that's meta.

[–] jivandabeast@lemmy.browntown.dev 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Like I feel your point, but also the ads definitely have a lot more identifiable information (target audience, keywords, sectors, etc.) they can use for detection & removal vs random posts using algospeak and other evasion tactics

[–] seriousslayerguy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Buddy, it's a multi-billion company - they could detect anything if they really wanted. But that coutry is ran by rich pedos and it shows.

[–] SpaceMan9000@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Honestly, when I still used it I saw a ton of obviously malicious and illegal ads. After reporting them I'd get the message that they followed their guidelines.

A lot of leaks have shown that they know their products are incredibly harmful, but that changing it would hurt their bottom line.

Meta is an evil company filled with careless people.

[–] usernameunnecessary@lemmy.zip 105 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

They're ok with their ads harming society, democracy, human rights and civil liberties. But they're removing ads that might give their victims the means to fight for the harm they caused them.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

A couple months ago a story came out of a court case that they would happily keep running ads that were identified as scams; they would just increase the advertising costs for the accounts running those ads. The more reports, the higher the price until they reach a limit to ban them. Basically if their users are getting scammed, they want a bigger cut.

[–] fnrir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Remember the time Signal ran an ad campaign on Facebook that told you what info Facebook gave them on you and got banned?

[–] sp3ctr4l@lemmy.dbzer0.com 47 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The strategy to fuck with a class action lawsuit is to fuck with the lawyers leading the class action lawsuit.

... This is how you get another class action lawsuit, which is comprised entirely of lawyers.

Jesus Fucking Christ, these people are idiots.

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Not that I think anything Facebook does is good, but doesn't this just make sense? They're not required to provide ad space to anyone, so why would they provide it to people who want to harm their business? If I was the evil CEO of an evil corporation, I would do the same.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

Yes, but it also hurts their case when they're demonstrating clearly that they can filter out ads they determine to be harmful.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope it leads to them losing another class action about scams. They claim it's too hard to regulate ads when there are so money, but clearly they can filter if they choose to.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I hope all of this leads to a huge swing in popular opinion that data surveillance has the same potential as home surveillance, meaning that by monitoring the data of the average person across platforms — you can reach the same conclusions as you would by taking tenancy in their home to monitor their livelihoods. Then, I hope we revisit the constitutional amendments and ask ourselves whether a modern interpretation of the 3rd would yield that protection of the house (I.e., “no soldier shall, in time of peace, be quartered in any house without the consent of the owner”) translates to protection of the data. Then I hope that we can interpret Engblom v. Carey to mean “soldier” applies to any executive authority. Finally, I hope we can all start paying a lot more attention to Larry Ellison — the man who is consolidating a whole lot of private healthcare data and top-secret defense contracts right now while the world remains focused on the Iran war.

I know, I am asking for a lot.

[–] 4am@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

They’re already monitoring us in our homes. What do you think Alexa was for? Why do you think every smart appliance connects to the cloud instead of a local hub now?

[–] dwemthy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Kind of related: if you use Gmail and Android check your spam folder! You might have a class action email informing you about the suit against Google. I had one in my spam folder, have seen others saying the same

[–] massacre@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago

Same here. Had it in spam. Tell your friends and maybe we can turn that into another class action. :)

I greedily await my $0.18!

Jfc you weren't kidding.

Taylor v. Google or just search class action

[–] The_Jit@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Woah and there it is. Thanks!

[–] MrShankles@reddthat.com 3 points 1 day ago

Well I'll be damned, I had one in my spam folder too. What petty little dicks, they should catch another suit for that. As if the lawsuit isn't already pocket change to them

[–] JustGottaWhippet@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

How are they farming emails to send invites to.

Huh, sure enough. Isn't that amazing.

[–] homes@piefed.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

I feel especially sorry for the dumb fucks who stuck around on Meta services long enough to notice the change.

But, at the same time, I don’t feel sorry for them, because, 15 years ago, I was screaming for them to get off the service, warning them of all the horrible things that were to come, and they ignored me.

So they got what was coming to them. As a result, the amount of pity I have for them is limited.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

and the same thing will happen to everyone using AI, today.

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

15 years ago was when I stopped using facebook. It had the potential to be a great way to organize and maintain social connections, but instead it was a toxic environment promoting the most annoying shit, particularly when posted by frequent users trying to broadcast their lives to the world. Simultaneously it did a great job of hiding anything I'd actually be interested to know. Fuck knows how bad it has become in the meantime. It was striking how much it seemed to bring out the worst in people, and equally remarkable how so many people just wanted to wallow in that.

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago

I hung on all the way to Covid. And holy shit did the world get to be its most toxic when we were all quarantined, locked in our homes, alone with our nasty thoughts, with only the internet as our outlet…

With only the nastiest and the worst of our internal thoughts to sustain us, that’s when I hopped off the crazy train. Went all that anyone had to offer was the most toxic and acidic of thoughts, that’s when I said “no more“.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

Frog in the pot.

[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Some of us have no choice. If I don't have social media, record labels won't sign my music. I cannot afford to pay someone else to maintain it for me.

[–] osanna@lemmy.vg 2 points 1 day ago

Link to music pls :)

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 22 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

Let's see if it pays out for them, Bolton

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

The fact that what this fucker does is still relevant is beyond me. It means there are people still using his dumpster fire of a website. And that's what's beyond me. Eventually I will not consider them as victims, but accomplices. No I don't care about your excuses and I will not take questions.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Corporate malpractice doesn't seem to register with a certain percentage of the population. Not unless they experience direct harm from it.

Perhaps because those people would do the same if they were in Zucks position.

It reminds me of a study I read a long time ago where students from certain fields had different interpretations of what's construed as lying or cheating. I remember they found that business students have a much lower bar for what's considered right and wrong.

STEM students had a much higher bar. These days I find it hard to believe tech would fit among that group anymore.

[–] voidsignal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Oh but facebook is all but a tech company. It's designed and controlled by "business" idiots. All the Silicon Valley is like that. Just a shadow of what it was, back then these STEM people were running the show.

But it seems these stupid companies start to realize that now it's Product Manager all the way down, they can't produce much, beside stupid planning. Why do you think they're so hell bent in believing their slop machines can replace devs?

[–] piranhaconda@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Yea tech got corrupted with the high software salaries. A friend of a friend is a software engineer, really smart guy, really nice and fun to be around from the few times I met him. But I lost a lot of respect for him once he told me he works for Samsung's ad department. I'm sure he makes a crap load though.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 2 points 1 day ago

They use Facebook marketplace. Apparently it’s better than democracy.

[–] crandlecan@mander.xyz 2 points 1 day ago

Why would they do that!! 😡

😂