this post was submitted on 08 Apr 2026
262 points (99.2% liked)

politics

29315 readers
2103 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

FCC boss Brendan Carr said CNN must face ‘accountability’ for a report he claims is inaccurate without providing evidence

Donald Trump fired off a seething threat against CNN Tuesday night in response to its reporting Iran had claimed a "great victory" over the U.S. following the president's announcement to delay his ceasefire deadline by two weeks.

Trump had originally given Iran until 8 p.m. ET Tuesday to reopen the Strait of Hormuz, warning a refusal would mean a "whole civilization will die."

Around 90 minutes before that deadline, Trump and the White House released statements saying the U.S. and Iran had agreed to negotiate an end to hostilities that would include the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and the suspension of fighting for two weeks.

Following the announcement, CNN published a post to its online live blog detailing the Iranian response.

top 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] homes@piefed.world 92 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

Trump basically caved, and accepted a variation of Iran’s 10 point plan. The US gained basically nothing while Iran gained complete and total control over the Stait of Hormuz, which they did not have before. and now they’re going to monetize it, when it used to be free to pass through.

Oh, and Israel gets to keep bombing Lebanon.

So, yeah, by any measure, Iran really did get to claim victory here.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 20 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Why is Israel still invading Lebanon?

[–] homes@piefed.world 65 points 1 day ago

Because Benjamin Netanyahu is a psychopathic genocidal piece of shit

[–] grue@lemmy.world 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 day ago
[–] SpaceNoodle@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago

*Lebanonsraum

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He doesn't need a reason. He's an evil person who just wants to kill other people.

[–] homes@piefed.world 7 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

A very specific group of other people, though. People who like to praise Allah, to be precise.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 1 points 15 hours ago

Like Trump you mean?

[–] YoureHotCupCake@lemmy.world 5 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Nah he will kill anyone that is on the land he claims is part of the greater Israel.

[–] homes@piefed.world 2 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

Convenient that only happens to be land with Muslims on it.

[–] bingbong@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 22 hours ago

They’re killing Christians too

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 20 hours ago

Justin Amash's family was targeted in their Eastern Orthodox church in the gaza thing, a former US Congressman, one that came out for impeachment against dear leader.

Not an oulier either. Israel does not just kill muslims.

[–] visch@quokk.au 1 points 15 hours ago

They claim they’re targeting Hezbollah who are firing rockets from Lebanon into Israel. Seems like they’re happy killing a bunch of civilians too.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

Epstein was an Israeli intelligence operation to compromise ivy league types, the ruling class, with video of them fucking children. A group that includes the president.

Blackmail.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 0 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

Hey look it's my CK2 Beta Israel to Israel game. That is not fucking good.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Why do people downvote this image? Epstein had one printed out in his house. This is what Israel obviously wants

[–] Gaja0@lemmy.zip 2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Because it's obviously AI?

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 2 points 17 hours ago

I just need to download crop and blow up the Epstein map then

[–] Goodeye8@piefed.social 11 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Oh, and Israel gets to keep bombing Lebanon.

About that. Iran and Pakistan have said, contrarily to what Israel claims, that the ceasefire includes Lebanon and applies to the US and all US allies. Soo, I guess we're about to see whether Trump will put the ceasefire talks in jeopardy to continue being Israels bitch or is he desperate enough to throw Israel under the bus just to get out of this massive fuckup he himself created.

[–] redsand@infosec.pub 5 points 21 hours ago

Israel doesn't care and has tapes of Trump, other world leaders and billionaires. Lebanon is screwed

[–] homes@piefed.world 5 points 22 hours ago

I think we all know which way that’s gonna go. But, hey, maybe we could all be surprised?

[–] Peekashoe@lemmy.wtf 2 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

The US gained basically nothing

You're forgetting, though, that Trump changed the Epstein news cycle. So since Trump doesn't understand the difference between him and the "US," I'm sure he'd disagree with you.

[–] homes@piefed.world 4 points 21 hours ago

He may have shifted the new cycle a little bit, but people are still talking about it enough that it isn’t totally dead, and it’s about to come back and rear. It’s ugly head again. And thanks to Jimmy Kimmel repeating it nonstop, people are now starting to refer to it as the Trump-Epstein files, lol.

[–] ShadowRam@fedia.io 40 points 1 day ago (2 children)

CNN must face ‘accountability’ for a report he claims is inaccurate without providing evidence

oh.. yes goof ball... open that box...

I'm sure your friends at Fox would love for you to set require that news agencies need to provide evidence for what they report.

[–] shirasho@feddit.online 21 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

Fox claims they arent news, but entertainment. It is how they have avoided lawsuits for decades.

[–] partofthevoice@lemmy.zip 8 points 20 hours ago

It’s not news, it’s infotainment.

It’s not a lottery, it’s sweepstakes.

It’s not a media company, it’s a technology company.

It’s fucking crazy how we write laws to govern entities, but we miraculously ignore any potential for legal criteria to define what constitutes each entity. At minimum, enough so that those entities can reclassify themselves with a wave of the hand to avoid the regulation.

Fucking word games. That’s what our legal system has succumbed to. The same kind of shit your parents used to yell at you for.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 7 points 20 hours ago

They argued at one point in court that no reasonable person would believe them.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 7 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That only applies to specific opinion shows like Tucker Carlson's. They have actual news segments that do have requirements to report factual information

[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 1 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah that was their argument.

"Oh THIS show is entertainment but this other one is news! They just look completely the same and air back to back!"

It was bullshit pedantry then and it still is.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

It's a reasonable distinction in theory but the two should be clearly labeled for what they are. You're absolutely right that they intentionally don't do that.

[–] ltxrtquq@lemmy.ml 5 points 22 hours ago

As far as I know, that only applied to their talk shows, like tucker carlson's old show before he got them sued by the dominion voting machine company.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

They are pointing out that he did not provide any evidence that it's inaccurate.

[–] wampus@lemmy.ca 5 points 17 hours ago

People claiming the US is getting nothing are again ignoring what came out in the Chat leak from last year, involving Hegseth, Gabbard, Vance, and so forth. One of their complaints was that the US was policing the region / ensuring trade routes for EU allies and Gulf states, without getting fully paid for the assets deployed in the region.

If Iran's plan says the US leaves the region, and/or if the result is that Gulf states/EU take a more active role in the region going forward, and/or it results in those parties paying the US more to maintain a security presence in the area, those are all things that align to the objectives of the current administration. The media really needs to update their expectations / get a better read of what the administration's objectives are -- the right-wing is quite explicitly publishing things like Project 2025 / other ideological books that paint their roadmap in brutally plain terms, it really doesn't take that much effort to dig up.

Another fun side thought, though entirely conjecture, is that the last time there was a major iranian conflict, it triggered significant recessions in many western nations. Canada, for example, had three things in the 80s that triggered interest rates to climb to 20%: Iranian energy crisis, US protectionism hammering the Canadian auto industry, and a softened global Canadian dollar/export problems. Almost seems like America's attempting to force a similar issue. If their current gong show in the middle east triggers similar issues globally, it'd potentially even serve to help the states with their stated ambition to annex Canada via economic warfare.

[–] Soulphite@reddthat.com 33 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

They're not wrong. The way everyone but the pedophile and his protectors see it is Iran had the upper hand and US is the struggling cry baby instigator in this war. All the pedophile has been doing is whining the entire time, as Iran holds firm... what a cry baby little bitch this giant pedophile is.

[–] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.world 1 points 22 hours ago
[–] protist@retrofed.com 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Brendan Carr has no jurisdiction over cable, but we all know that's not going to stop him from trying

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago

With this administration, jurisdiction is wherever they think it is, and it's up to Congress and/or the courts to disagree with him.

Or CNN is going to offer a tribute to Trump and this will go away.

We are no longer a country of law. We are a country ruled by fiat.

[–] 2piradians@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Any major news outlet has a duty to report statements from sovereign nations engaged in war. Obviously.

It's important to keep perspective on what is right and what's normal, tiring as it is lately. We have to challenge this moron's tyranny at every little step, lest any of the insanity become normalized.

[–] DoucheBagMcSwag@piefed.social 2 points 18 hours ago

It's okay, Larry Ellison will have Skydance take a buzzsaw to CNN after they fully acquire CNN.

Media fascist messaging consolidation is why they wanted WB so bad