What do you mean "could be"? It's pretty clear cut and we've been spending the past 4 years condemning russia for terrorizing and attacking civilian infrastructure like that
this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
192 points (99.0% liked)
politics
29429 readers
3360 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Yes! Is war crime! No “could be”
Targeting civilian infrastructure like Russia does is a war crime. Just threatening to do that is not as clear. I think that nobody will doubt that to actually follow through with the threat would be a war crime.
Plenty of propaganda outlets would cast doubt on it. AP is preemptively doing it right now. If you read the article it is not talking about the threats, it is specifically discussing whether bombing power plants would be a war crime. Shameful
The article above seems to be on the side that to indiscriminately target civilian infrastructure is a war crime. The wording of the article can be confusing for sure.
It is still presenting it as a point of discussion rather than a foregone conclusion, which it should be.
"So-called world leaders around the world stated Monday that they would vigorously wag their fingers and sternly say "No! Bad Trump!" If he were to carry out war crimes (again). The administration was in tears laughing when journalists asked if they were concerned about the repercussions for committing war crimes. Steven Miller crawled out from beneath the carpet to say "what are you fucking losers going to do about it?" before leaping across the room to catch a mouse and eat it live."
Wish i had more than one ⬆️ for you.
If I was the next president I'd immediately join ICC agreements. Then I'd demand the past living presidents all be reviewed for war crimes and crimes against humanity. Obama included. We need to clean house to show the world we're done being the evil empire. Trump sucks but every president since FDR has been a worse president.
We need to clean house to show the world we're done being the evil empire.
Except the US is clearly not done being the evil empire. On either side of the aisle.
Join the ICC, let international inspectors take a look at US military bases, re-join the climate accords and all the other international treaties Trump backed out of, and pass a constitutional amendment to ratify all that and another one to reform your election system.
Maybe this will be enough to eventually re-gain the trust of other nations, eventually.
We have to reform the electoral system so that people vote instead of land or we’ll just end up right back where we are.
Much more accurate headline. 
trump Threatens to Commit Even More War Crimes If Iran Maintains Sovereignty
FTFY
And now he's threatening to destroy the entire Iranian civilization.
https://www.cnbc.com/2026/04/07/iran-war-trump-deadline.html
US President announcing genocide on Social Media .... What a fucked up Timeline
He really is horribly, frighteningly dangerous. First term he had to limit his behaviour to get a 2nd term. This time he's got nothing to lose
So, do americans think this administration (or literally any of the previous ones) will be called to account at the Hauge? Do they know about this? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Service-Members%27_Protection_Act
Do people tell themselves it's okay because these bad people will be punished? So it's okay for the "good guys" to do nothing to interfere?
Yikes.
Oh no, a law!
Welp, pack it up guys. Our hands are tied by a law, nothing the future President and Congress can do about that.
It's been 20+ years but sure
*is a
COULD???????
I saw this. It's terrifying. I am, for the first time in my life, afraid that someone could actually use a nuke.
The rollercoaster of seeing that tweet, and this image back-to-back: https://images-assets.nasa.gov/image/art002e009288/art002e009288~large.jpg
☠️
God, imagine being one of those astronauts watching it all go down. You’re definitely dead too, just on a separate timeline from the rest of us, whether you for some reason try to get back or not.
Half the people I know, plus several books I've read lately, think that a small nuclear incident is required to get us back on track. We need to see devastation and horror to appreciate peace. Well, shit. Am I rooting for it? Kind of.
I will be burning things down.
Great! We got him!
Now that experts said he's a war criminal he will be impeached and gone before summer. I'm so glad it's over.
/s
I'm not an expert yet I KNOW it's a war crime.
WHEN are we gonna stop him? I vote NOW.
What is this “War Crime” thing I keep seeing mentioned. I see so many articles talking about people committing these “crimes,” but I never even see anyone being tried, let alone convicted, of any such thing.
It's reddit talk for jerk me off
We got em!!! We got em on war crimes this time! It's over, woohoo!
Every fucking day