this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2026
152 points (100.0% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

653 readers
303 users here now

Militaria shitposting central! Post memes, tasteless jokes, and sexual cravings for military equipment and/or nuclear self-destruction!

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by Piefed.social terms and conditions
  2. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  3. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:
!forgottenweapons@lemmy.world

For the other, slightly less political NCD, !noncredibledefense@sh.itjust.works

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wouldn’t feel comfortable attacking people, because there’s no telling if they’re viscous killers or involuntary, reluctant draftees. Sign me up to attack a grounded plane, though. Especially if it’s a rare, expensive one!

[–] Damage@feddit.it 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Viscosity is a range anyways

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 4 points 1 week ago

They're more viscous than water. More vicious, too.

[–] real_squids@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 week ago

You can try drone interceptors then. There's new tech that allows pilots to control them hundreds of kilometers away

[–] notabot@piefed.social 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You jest, but a Texan company created an internet controlled rifle turret over 20 years ago. There was talk of using it for hunting, but I don't know if that went anywhere. The jump from that to hunting humans with flying drones is more one of morality than technology.

[–] nelly_man@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Also, in a similar vein, there are reports about wealthy people going to Bosnia in the '90s during the war on safaris to kill people. So the concept of allowing random civilians to participate is not without precedent either.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c3epygq5272o

[–] ReverendIrreverence@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago

A horrible hint of the Sarajevo Safaris

[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I could so see them chopping up a person, spreading their entrails in the hope to grow into a tree.

Oh wait you mean the controlling the simulation thing, my bad

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That only works after the war is over and you have time to reflect on your role in genocide.

Man that series went off the rails fast

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago

Yeah such a strong start then just crazy. Still I really enjoyed the books but it certainly felt unrelated.

Kinda reminds me of the Alastair Reynolds books. Very interesting but only vaguely connected

[–] Dasus@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

An HR manager paying 15k to kill people remotely seems fitting.

Ofc it's fucking Sara from HR. She always had that look in her eye.

[–] Godric@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

puts away credit card

Ah yes, satire, haha yes....

[–] Etterra@discuss.online 10 points 1 week ago

You round up the right gamers and you can grief Russia into rage quitting the war.

[–] Cypher@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] Damage@feddit.it 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

That's seriously fucked up

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That doesn't even hold a candle to the mobile crematoriums that were deployed early in the war.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's not a competition, but the people who "buy" this "service" are not involved in the war in any way, they have zero reason aside from mental illness to participate in it. It's seriously fucked.

Killing people is not a sport, even in war it shouldn't be done lightly, no matter who's the taeget. Check yourselves.

[–] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

checks self

Wow! After some self-examination I was surprised to discover that I actually have zero problem with anyone killing fascists, for any reason, and in any manner! I was also surprised to discover that I have a negative opinion toward anyone who thinks that's a problem!

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yeah sure, let's keep on exterminating poor people, while also giving rich fucks a chance to hunt them for sport, that's absolutely fine.

There's a difference between fighting an invader because you have to, and paying just to kill someone, putting yourself willingly in a situation you had no need to be in.

Luckily it's just a meme.

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean if this were real those people were going to die anyway so it's not exactly a blood spot.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's so completely beside the point I wouldn't even know where to start, but let's ignore that, would it be ok for you to pay for the privilege of killing a death row inmate?

[–] echodot@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Isn't that the whole point though? They're going to die anyways so the method by which they die is irrelevant. It certainly has nothing to do with any decision that I may make.

From a moral point of view nothing has changed, death has occurred but it was always going to occur.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago

From a moral point of view nothing has changed, death has occurred but it was always going to occur.

It has. Something unpleasant that could arguably be a necessary evil, became a source of pleasure for disturbed individuals.

[–] HikingVet@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Lol.

Completely wiffing the point of how fucked this invasion by Russia is that paying to kill an infantry soldier with a drone is orders of magnitude less of a war crime than the top of the list.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 3 points 1 week ago

As I wrote, I don't think it's a competition in fucked-up-ness.

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Don't worry, it's not real.

[–] Damage@feddit.it 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know, or there would have been several expletives

[–] PugJesus@piefed.social 2 points 1 week ago

At the least!

[–] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

There is plenty of military imfrastructure to destroy, it doesn't have to be people.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Much of the Ukraine war is already crowdfunded. Crowdsourcing the fighting is a logical next step. The future will be great!

[–] MutantTailThing@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago
[–] Evil_Shrubbery@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 week ago

If GTA6 VR sells well wealthy ppl will be able to do that in USA by charting one of them fancy robots.

[–] angband@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Wolverines!

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 2 points 1 week ago

Manhack Arcade from the Half-Life 2 Beytah

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Petro Oleksiiovych Poroshenko (born 26 September 1965) is a Ukrainian politician and oligarch who served as the fifth president of Ukraine from 2014 to 2019.

Dude wants to play a game for the weekend, where can he buy the tickets?

Oh wait he's probably already playing the beta-test lmao

[–] Landless2029@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Getting closer and closer to slaughter bots...