
Star Trek
/c/StarTrek: Your safe harbored Spacedock in these Stellar Seas!
Fire up the inertial dampeners, retract all moorings and clear space dock. It's time to boldy go where no one has gone before!
~ 1. Be Civil. This is a Star Trek community and lets keep that energy. Be kind, respectful and polite to one another.
~ 2. Be Courteous. Please use the spoiler tags for any new Trek content that's been released in the past month. Check this page for lemmy formatting) for any posts. Also please keep spoilers out of the titles!
~ 3. Be Considerate. We're spread out across a lot of different instances but don't forget to follow your instances rules and the instance rules for Lemmy.world.

captian. I find myself. growing fatigued.
Tap for spoiler

You don't even have to specify why.
Great ep for any number of reasons.
I guess this ep also suggests that Starfleet's war / exploration ships should be more cautious, and let research ships follow up as standard protocol.
I don't know that much about Sikhism, but I thought Sikhs tend towards being very kind, selfless, and brave people. Khan certainly doesn't seem to fit that mold in the usual sense.
This is the first mention of the Eugenics Wars and World War III. Previously, the show had mentioned that Earth was ravaged by war prior to exploring the stars and joining the Federation but didn't go into specifics. But they treat the Eugenics Wars like WWIII, putting WWIII in the 1990s which causes all sorts of continuity problems.
Looking at the dialog, you can read it as Spock saying geneticly engineered humans were a product of a World War, and Bones simply specifying the Eugenics Wars was him correcting Spock, not denoting WWIII's Human designation.
At this point in time, Roddenberry was just making this shit up as he went along, so it's a wonder how few plot holes there are regarding Earth's past.
I don't know that much about Sikhism, but I thought Sikhs tend towards being very kind, selfless, and brave people. Khan certainly doesn't seem to fit that mold in the usual sense.
He came from the Sikhs, or his parents did, but his engineering clearly gave him delusions of grandeur that wouldn't have normally been there, as Spock pointed out.
Good points!
I think Roddenberry typically did so many final script rewrites because he was most-responsible for the series 'bible,' and was legitimately concerned that things were as consistent as possible, in-universe. I'm certainly not his biggest fan, but apart from him routinely stealing others' contribution credits, I tend to think he did pretty well, there.
Btw, yesterday I discovered a ST fan convention program from 1975 next to my old AD&D books. It's pretty cool, and contains an interesting, almost psychedelic short comic strip. I'll have to see if someone scanned it already and has it online, otherwise...
khan was sihk. I guess makes sense given his last name.
They "fridged" Marla for Wrath of Khan as an added knife in the back. You'd think the stranding on and deterioration of the planet would be motivation enough.
Discussion about Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan
Was there ever a version of the script that had Marla in it? Was she removed for simplicity or was she unavailable to reprise her role? Was Khan's son there to make up for her not being there?
Can you imagine if Marla had been the voice of reason for Khan during the whole movie, then she dies and Khan goes insane?
That last bit would have strengthened his resolve and demise nicely.
Per Memory-Alpha:
It was the intent of the filmmakers, and a widely accepted fact in Star Trek apocrypha, that this wife was Marla McGivers from the original "Space Seed" episode; however, while this was in the original script, it was never confirmed on-screen.
What I remember most from this episode was Kirk’s open contempt for not just Marla, but Starfleet historians in general. It was arrogant, obnoxious, but totally in character.