this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
231 points (91.7% liked)

Privacy

9448 readers
556 users here now

A community for Lemmy users interested in privacy

Rules:

  1. Be civil
  2. No spam posting
  3. Keep posts on-topic
  4. No trolling

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kamayatu24@lemmy.world 3 points 48 minutes ago

I don't know, I have an extension that refuses cookies.

This makes life safer and easier.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 hours ago

Which generation is that lol?

[–] AAA@feddit.org 15 points 3 hours ago

I'd rather say the same people who rejected cookies are also rejecting AI, no?

[–] anyhow2503@lemmy.world 66 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

There's no need to turn everything into a genration war. Computer literacy and a sense for maintaining privacy comes and goes with different groups of people depending on their upbringing. The ones who cared about their privacy to the point that they would refuse cookies on every site are definitely not the ones who roll over and let the AI agents access all of their data. A lack of good education and deliberate influence of the advertisement and tech industry has led us to this point and snarky flamebait on twitter isn't getting us anywhere.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago

I agree. Op reasoning is flawed in many ways: both the relation to generations, and the assumption that people who do x are destined to do y.

The most infuriating part of this statement is the supposed relation to generations. It is yet another discriminatory behaviour which usually goes under the radar. Just like it happens within sexism, op has needlessly correlated things to age.

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

But it makes it easy to understand through the lense of our existing prejudices!

[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world -2 points 5 hours ago

What this person said

[–] anamethatisnt@sopuli.xyz 77 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (7 children)

Which generation refused cookies?
I feel like most look at me like I'm crazy, regardless of age, when I deny/only accept the functional cookies on sites every single visit.

[–] tordenflesk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

There's UBO filter-lists for that.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

I just have my browser set up to delete all cookies whenever I close it. You want to set a cookie, knock yourself out, website.

(I do also have various things that block some, but if more people just had "delete cookies at browser close" as default, that'd be a big deal.)

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 31 points 5 hours ago

Yeah, I don't think the two groups of people named in this post have much overlap. They seem pretty distinct to me as well

[–] nul42@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 hours ago

When the Financial Times published the article, "This Bug in Your PC is a Smart Cookie" on 12 February 1996 I remember quite a lot of people getting upset about it. At the time most were on dialup so you had a different IP assigned every time you connected so the idea you were being tracked in any way was a shock.

[–] 13igTyme@piefed.social 5 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

Should be denying all. I refuse to use websites that say there are "functional" or "required" cookies. That's bullshit. Also use extension that block and/or scrub cookies.

[–] teyrnon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 17 minutes ago

What about "persistent" cookies? I spent hours and was unable to find them, let alone remove them.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 24 points 5 hours ago

Some cookies are useful, like the ones keeping you logged in. Not all cookies are created with the sole purpose of tracking you.

[–] Opisek@piefed.blahaj.zone 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Apart from keeping you logged in, like the other commenter mentioned, cookies can for example be used to save the theme you are using (light/dark) or the language you picked. It would be annoying to have to reselect that every time you move to a different subpage.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 1 points 24 minutes ago

Your browser passes theme and language recommendations to every site you visit. So outside of passwords, there are fewer reasons for cookies than you may presume.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 3 points 5 hours ago

uBlock origin has a filter available for these cookie popups

[–] Rothe@piefed.social 13 points 4 hours ago

Please stop with the generational strife nonsense. It only serves as an attempt to distract from class war. We are all in this together against the rich bastards, regardless of our age.

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

KIDS THESE DAYS, AMIRITE?

[–] Ghostie@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 hours ago

Bold words from someone on X

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

What generation is that???

[–] zerobot@lemmy.wtf 1 points 3 hours ago

just remember we live in a society

[–] CodenameDarlen@lemmy.world 6 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Is it that bad? I see there are people giving full access to AI but I always thought it wasn't so much to refer to it as "a generation".

[–] otacon239@lemmy.world 18 points 5 hours ago

Remember, the only real separation in society is generated by the upper class!

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 4 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

It's very much not a generational thing. More gen alpha might use AI because they're young and keep up with trends more, but there's still plenty that denounce it and plenty of boomers who accept it.

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

More gen alpha might use AI because they're young and keep up with trends more

That's not entirely true. There are cases where gen alpha students revolted against AI usage. One of the incidents was about the usage of Chromebooks which forced students to use AI - bottom line is, people where upset.

[–] mushroommunk@lemmy.today 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Literally didn't read the rest of my sentence.

there's still plenty that denounce it

You're arguing my point for me that it's not a generational thing

[–] Virtvirt588@lemmy.world 1 points 59 minutes ago

Treat it as an accompanying argument rather than arguing a point for your sake. Its just a different perspective exceplifying the point by focusing on the impacted group.

[–] CubitOom@infosec.pub 1 points 3 hours ago

Its because we thought r2d2 was cool and we all secretly want a robot friend.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

It has been interesting to me to hear tech professionals talk about giving AI Agents access to their desktops, and I suppose it's just the next step after people gave everything over to voice assistants.

I've just heard way too many stories of GenAI and LLM products screwing things up in a major way to ever be comfortable with that and never really got into smart home technology on the assumption (now proven correct) that the devices snoop on their users. I have a smart phone but generally keep it in a faraday bag.