this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2026
144 points (99.3% liked)

politics

29271 readers
2245 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The U.S. Marshals Service allowed some members of Musk’s security team to sidestep experience and training requirements, according to emails.

Members of Elon Musk’s private security team were deputized as federal agents last year even though some of the billionaire’s guards lacked the required training and law enforcement experience, according to newly released government emails.

The emails shed new light on how the U.S. Marshals Service responded to Musk’s entourage during his five-month stint in the second Trump administration. The agency in February 2025 approved a request that it said came from the White House to deputize Musk’s bodyguards, a decision that allowed them to carry weapons in some federal buildings and continue protecting him.

The Marshals Service released the emails and related documents in response to a request under the Freedom of Information Act filed by Democracy Forward, a progressive advocacy group that has been investigating Musk's tenure in the Trump administration. The group, which filed a lawsuit last year to get the records, shared them with NBC News.

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 11 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I'm okay with guards for billionaires being rank amateurs unable to tell their asses from elbows.

[–] BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Just take out the body guards first.

[–] TheGoldenV@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Drop an acorn and let them do the hard work for you?

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 30 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

If the billionaires enabling this shit don't rot in cells, it will keep happening.

[–] notwhoyouthink@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 hours ago

100%, this creates precedent and normalizes this type of ‘meh laws’ behavior.

One lucky desk pop is all it takes. I believe in you, P320-carrying mooks.

[–] NutWrench@lemmy.ml 18 points 9 hours ago

Whoa. Are you saying "Big Balls" wasn't carefully vetted to access and share restricted information? This comes as quite a shock.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 10 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Considering between then and now a million other illegal things have been happening, I don’t think this will be a high priority for anyone.

[–] crusa187@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 hours ago

If we want justice, this is why we need to hire many competent federal prosecutors. Undo the gutting of the justice dept that happened with doge/trump2, and then add to their ranks on top of that. Then each of them can have their own handful of high priority cases to ensure none of these bastards flies under the radar. This is precisely the type of enormous task which governmental institutions should be well equipped to handle.

[–] shweddy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

So the people protecting elon musk with their lives aren't even the best of the best? Hmmm interesting to think about

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 5 points 8 hours ago

Rules for thee.