299
top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dugmeup@lemmy.world 125 points 7 months ago

It's not for any 4 star generals. The Republicans still want to hold the senior leadership under their boot for a potential military involvement in the elections.

Before you decide to downvote me, this is openly called for by the orange dictator in training who has put pressure on the military. Gen Milley called him out for this

https://www.vanguardngr.com/2023/09/top-us-military-officer-steps-down-calls-trump-wannabe-dictator/amp/

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Only ten of those. They can get through those

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago

They're going to sell this to the promoted troops as "that promotion that senator noob tube got you" to divide the military so they can kick off a real civil war, and guess who the military industrial complex is going to support in that war?

[-] ForestOrca@kbin.social 48 points 7 months ago

How are the actions of Sen. Tuberville not treasonous?

[-] OldWoodFrame@lemm.ee 38 points 7 months ago

He was using the leverage available to him to make a political point. The problem is that we have a system that leaves military readiness open to the whims of a single politician, giving him the ability to do it.

[-] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 7 months ago

On one hand, the republican nonsensical behavior is exposing a large array of weaknesses in our political system, which can enable proper change to strengthen it against these kinds of malicious exploits.

On the other hand, fat chance anybody actually does anything about that.

[-] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

Who's gonna press charges?

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

His team has more moles in DOJ than the other team does

[-] rbesfe@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

What he did wasn't illegal

[-] wiLD0@lemmy.world 39 points 7 months ago

Wait til you see Republicans take credit for the promotions.

[-] Fapper_McFapper@lemmy.world 36 points 7 months ago

I hope the FBI, the CIA, the DHS, and the DOJ are so far up Tuberville’s ass they can see his molars.

[-] ghostdoggtv@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

From above, nothing less will suffice

[-] Aidinthel@reddthat.com 32 points 7 months ago

I don't care about military promotions but I do like to see regressives lose, so I guess this is good.

[-] Alto@kbin.social 39 points 7 months ago

You should for the same reason you should care he's still holding up the more senior ranks, he's hoping to leave them vacant for Trump to fill with people loyal to him

[-] Hazzia@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 7 months ago

Not advocating for this, but theoretically, couldn't a dem do the exact same thing if worst comes to worse and Trump did get elected?

[-] Machindo@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

Amen ✊😔

[-] Wrench@lemmy.world 27 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Congrats on accomplishing absolutely nothing but pissing off pretty much everyone but our rivals with your childish grand standing.

[-] Mamertine@lemmy.world 38 points 7 months ago

He did accomplish a thing. He single-handedly managed to compromise national security. With all the open positions, work wasn't able to get done and some people legit burnt out trying to do the work of many people.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

Republicans are worthless traitor filth.

[-] TallonMetroid@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

Their backpay should come out of the fucker's pockets.

[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 15 points 7 months ago

You cannot back pay a rank that was never promoted unfortunately. We can simply garnish that senator's wages but he'd still make more money than his entire district from insider trading anyways

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 9 points 7 months ago

They told him that campaign season was coming up and his actions would hurt other GOPs.

[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

his actions would hurt other GOPs.

Did I just read someone use Grand Old Party (GOP) as a pronoun?

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

I take it you're new to politics. GOP as a 'pronoun' has been a thing for decades. Possibly since the phrase 'Grand Old Party' was originated.

[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social -4 points 7 months ago

Please link me one reputable news agency that uses the acronym GOP as a pronoun.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago
[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

Nowhere in that article does it use GOP as a pronoun nor had it claimed it is used as one. I'm just thinking that the GOP are hypocritical enough to adopt it as one.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 2 points 7 months ago

Definition of a Pronoun : The word that is used in place of a noun or a noun phrase is known as pronoun. A pronoun is used in place of a noun to avoid the repetition of the noun.

GOP isn't a 'pronoun,' it's a nickname and has been for decades.

[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 1 points 7 months ago

You literally used it as a pronoun 13 hours ago. However I'm also dumb and likely misunderstood what you wrote.

[-] Dagwood222@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

[sigh] A pronoun is a word you use instead of a proper name. "The Model T was built for decades. It was America's most popular car." In that sentence 'it' is a pronoun.

"The Model T was a common sight in every city and town. Everyone knew someone who drove a Tin Lizzie." Tin Lizzie was another name for the Model T. 'Tin Lizzie' isn't a pronoun, it's a proper name.

GOP isn't a 'pronoun' and never was. It's always been a proper name and that's how I used it. Like the word 'fish' it can mean a single member of the Republican Party, or the Party as a whole.

[-] BaroqueInMind@kbin.social 2 points 7 months ago

Thank you for your patience replying and teaching me something.

[-] Kepabar@startrek.website 4 points 7 months ago

It's been used that way in common parlance for as long as I can remember.

[-] joeyv120@ttrpg.network 6 points 7 months ago

He's a hero /s

[-] mp3@lemmy.ca 5 points 7 months ago
[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 7 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


WASHINGTON (AP) — The Senate in a single stroke Tuesday approved about 425 military promotions after Sen. Tommy Tuberville of Alabama ended a monthslong blockade of nominations over his opposition to a Pentagon abortion policy.

Tuberville was blocking the nominations in opposition to Pentagon rules that allow travel reimbursement when a service member has to go out of state to get an abortion or other reproductive care.

President Joe Biden’s administration instituted the new rules after the Supreme Court overturned the nationwide right to an abortion, and some states have limited or banned the procedure.

The issue came to a head when U.S. Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Eric Smith suffered a heart attack in October, just two days after he’d talked about the stress of the holds at a military conference.

Tuberville emerged from a closed-door luncheon with his GOP colleagues, saying “all of us are against a rule change in the Senate.” He was adamant that “we did the right thing for the unborn and for our military” by fighting back against executive overreach.

Sen. Jack Reed, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, said after the vote that the first thing he wanted to do was to apologize to the hundreds of officers whose promotions were stalled.


The original article contains 844 words, the summary contains 211 words. Saved 75%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
299 points (99.3% liked)

politics

18074 readers
3537 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect!
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS